<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11.09.28</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>11.09.28, Terasawa, Old English Metre (Daniel Paul O'Donnell)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>O'Donnell</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>University of Lethbridge</aff>
          <address>
            <email>daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011">
        <year>2011</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Terasawa, Jun</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Old English Metre: An Introduction, Toronto Anglo-Saxon Series</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year>
        <publisher-loc>Toronto</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>University of Toronto Press</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. 154</page-range>
        <price>$19.95</price>
        <isbn>978-1-4426-1129-0</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2011 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>

Jun Terasawa's <italic>Old English Metre: An Introduction</italic> is a textbook
aimed at the beginning student. It introduces students to what is in
essence the approach to scansion and understanding of Old English
metre developed by Eduard Sievers in the nineteenth century and later
improved upon and further developed by A. J. Bliss in the 1960s
(Sievers 1885, 1893; Bliss 1962, 1967).</p>
    <p>

In the preface, Terasawa indicates that his book has a "twofold
purpose": "First, as an introductory book, it attempts to provide
beginners with the basics of Old English metre" (x), and second, it
seeks to provide "an up-to-date view of current work in the field of
Old English metre" (xi), which, in Terasawa's terms, means primarily
"the interaction between Old English metre and other components, such
as word-formation/word-choice and grammar" and "metre-related problems
of dating, authorship, and the distinction between verse and prose."</p>
    <p>

The book delivers on these goals in an uneven fashion. It has
excellent exercises and a superb appendix on how students might
approach the scansion of a line of Old English poetry. The sections on
the interaction of metre with word choice, grammar, and other literary
and historical questions are also very good and present some excellent
questions for advanced students to pursue as they learn to apply their
new knowledge of Old English prosody. On the other hand, the first
part of the book seems to be less successful--and probably more
frustrating to the student--than many already-existing basic
introductions to Old English metre. Given the author's express aim of
bringing the student from an absolute beginner's knowledge up to a
level advanced enough that they can follow "current work" in the field,
moreover, the lack of any significant discussion of alternate theories
and practices to scansion, of which several promising ones have been
developed in the course of the last quarter century, is also
surprising.</p>
    <p>

Evaluating a textbook as a textbook is probably the most subjective
thing a reviewer can be asked to do. Almost inevitably, the answer
will depend on questions of taste and experience: "Do I think that
this textbook would work with my students?" "Do I think this textbook
would have worked with me?" "Do I prefer this treatment of the subject
over the introductory textbooks I already use (and hence am more
familiar with) or that I myself was taught from?"</p>
    <p>

Unfortunately, in my case, the answer to most of these questions is
"no." The author suggests that "recent Old English grammar books and
readers often dispense with metrical matters, or at best content
themselves with a brief introduction to the subject" (x). But in doing
so, he is able to list nearly a half-dozen "exceptions," most
published within the last twenty years, including Pope-Fulk's student
edition <italic>Eight Old English Poems</italic> (2001) and Baker's
<italic>Introduction to Old English</italic> (2007). Terasawa omits recent
editions of Mitchell and Robinson's <italic>Guide</italic> (1992 onwards) from
this list, although this may be because he considers their treatment
of metre to be too brief.</p>
    <p>

In my opinion, many of these books do as good or better a job of
introducing students to the basics of Old English metre, especially
the Sievers-Bliss system Terasawa focusses on. This is especially true
of Pope-Fulk, which introduces almost all the material in chapters 1-4
of Terasawa's book, in a more compact (29 vs. 62 pages), and, to my
mind, more overseeable fashion. While the material is largely the same,
Terasawa's exposition strikes me as more likely to be confusing to the
beginning student. His first chapter begins by diving straight into a
summary of the major points of the rest of the book: a quick account
of details of alliteration and rhythm and then some more advanced
issues of the interaction of word choice and grammatical variation. In
addition to introducing a large number of potentially quite confusing
and foreign concepts to the student all at once, this approach
neglects to provide the kind of contextual orientation that students
often seem to find quite useful: broad, conceptual answers to
questions about the history of Old English metre, how it differs from
the more familiar poetry, or the (quite interesting) story behind how
we know anything about it.</p>
    <p>

Similar issues with organisation and approach appear throughout the
chapters designed to introduce students to major concepts. An
important element in understanding Old English poetry, for example,
involves a knowledge of the relationship between word classes, metre,
and sentence stress. Certain types of words in Old English are more
likely than others to take stress in a line. Nouns, adjectives, non-
finite verbs, some adverbs, and certain types of pronouns, for example,
almost always receive stress in the line; proclitics and other
particles that normally immediately proceed stress-bearing words
usually do not receive stress; and a third category including finite
verbs, some adverbs, demonstrative pronouns, and the like may or may
not take stress depending on position and the other words in the line.</p>
    <p>

Terasawa explains this principle quite well at the beginning of his
third chapter, "Rhythm: the Basics." The problem, however, is that the
student may already be confused by this point. In the previous chapter,
he or she had been introduced to a more limited version of the same
concept, under a different name and said (not entirely accurately) to
apply only to nominals and finite verbs, during a discussion of the
"Alliterative Rule of Precedence" (a method for determining which
words in a given line take alliteration). By the time the broader
concept of precedence has been introduced in chapter three, indeed,
the student has already read about and had an exercise on exceptions
to the more limited presentation of the same rule a chapter earlier.</p>
    <p>

Given the author's emphasis on current work in the second half of the
book, an important lacuna in <italic>Old English Metre: An Introduction</italic>
is its failure to present adequate alternatives to the Sievers-Bliss
system. While the Sievers-Bliss method is useful descriptively, it
does not, as Fulk has suggested in his revision of Pope, "constitute a
plausible <italic>theory</italic> of meter" (Pope 2001, 149). Since many of the
alternate approaches that have been proposed over the years have fared
poorly when subjected to serious scrutiny, and since few have been
adopted widely for even brief periods of time, it would be a mistake
to devote much space to teaching their details. But, especially in the
last twenty-five years, some serious and reasonably widely-practiced
alternatives (perhaps especially Russom 1987, 1998) have emerged that
could be usefully introduced to the type of students on whom Terasawa
is focussing after they have mastered the basics of Sievers-Bliss.</p>
    <p>

Although, on the whole, <italic>Old English Metre: An Introduction</italic>
seems to me to be less useful as an introductory textbook than other
readily available works, there are ways in which it is far superior to
anything else on the market. Terasawa's book has simply the best
exercises on Old English metre (and to a certain extent literary
analysis) I have ever seen. The second section of the book, on the
relationship between metre and questions of word-choice, grammar, and
other literary topics, is also superb and likely to prove fascinating
to the advanced student. And finally, it concludes with an appendix
that provides students with an algorithmic approach to scansion that
seems to me likely to be of great help to any student of the subject.</p>
    <p>

What these excellences in the book have in common is their ability to
lead students into asking themselves complex research questions about
their subject in a way they can answer with the skills they have just
learned--Professor Terasawa is clearly a superb teacher! Students have
no sooner learned about alliteration than they are asked to consider
why certain patterns never appear; they learn about rhythm and they
are asked to consider how the demands of rhythm has affected poets'
compositional choices. The examples used in these exercises are
extremely well chosen, and the questions are simple yet very thought-
provoking.</p>
    <p>

So in the end, <italic>Old English Metre: An Introduction</italic> is probably
more useful as a resource for the teacher and advanced student of Old
English poetry than it is as a textbook for a class of beginners.
While better resources exist for teaching the principles of the
Sievers-Bliss system to novices, there are few if any better sources
for excellent exercise questions, topics for discussion, and
interesting advanced problems in the application of metrical
principles to literary problems.</p>
    <p>

--------</p>
    <p>

Works Cited</p>
    <p>

Baker, Peter S. 2007. <italic>An Introduction to Old English</italic>. Second
Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.</p>
    <p>
Bliss, A.J. 1962. <italic>An Introduction to Old English Metre</italic>. Oxford:
Blackwell.</p>
    <p>
---. 1967. <italic>The Metre of Beowulf</italic>. Oxford: Blackwell.</p>
    <p>
Mitchell, Bruce and Fred C. Robinson. 1992. <italic>A Guide to Old
English</italic>. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.</p>
    <p>
Pope, John C. 2001. <italic>Eight Old English Poems</italic>. Third edition,
revised by R.D. Fulk. New York: Norton.</p>
    <p>
Russom, Geoffrey. 1987. <italic>Old English Meter and Linguistic Theory</italic>.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p>
    <p>
---. 1998. <italic>Beowulf and Old Germanic Metre</italic>. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.</p>
    <p>
Sievers, Eduard. 1885. "Zur Rhythmik des germanischen
Alliterationsverses." <italic>Beitrge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache
und Literatur</italic> 10: 209-314, 451-545.</p>
    <p>
--- 1893. <italic>Altgermanische Metrik</italic>. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
</p>
    <p/>
  </body>
</article>
