<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">baj9928.0811.00908.11.09</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>08.11.09, Walsh, The Cult of St. Katherine (John Kitchen)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kitchen</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>University of Alberta</aff>
          <address>
            <email>john.kitchen@ualberta.ca</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2008">
        <year>2008</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Walsh, Christine</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>The Cult of St. Katherine of Alexandria in Early Medieval Europe, Church, Faith, and Culture in the Medieval West</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year>
        <publisher-loc>Burlington, VT</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Ashgate</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. 222</page-range>
        <price>$99.95</price>
        <isbn>978-0-75465-861-0</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2008 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>A study providing more information than Walsh's about Saint
Katherine's early following is difficult for this reviewer to imagine.
The discussion offers an extensive investigation encompassing the
hagiography, iconography, charters, dedications, figures, geography
and politics surrounding the cult's origins and development. While the
treatment is especially strong in its critical scrutiny of the "varied
and scattered" (2) sources, there is another aspect to the work that
readers might easily lose sight of when faced with such an abundance
of material so meticulously examined. The inquiry's less discernible
but no less important contribution is its delineation of a complex
process, one in which the inchoate expressions of piety slowly
coalesced into a thriving cult. Walsh's book reminds us of how
uncertain saintly afterlife can be: no more than an oral tradition
initially commemorates Katherine; for a long time no relics were on
hand to draw pilgrims; though her story goes back to Roman times, even
as late as the tenth century her cult "is still quite minor" (27); she
could have languished "forever in obscurity" (143). Yet Katherine
would emerge as one of Western Europe's most popular saints. How did
this happen? That is the larger question the book addresses; and it
does so by examining closely the early textual and visual
representations that led to her gradual reception into the mainstream
of medieval religious life.</p>
    <p>Walsh's approach, as the book's title indicates, is to focus primarily
on the cult rather than the saint herself, for in all likelihood there
is no historical Katherine, at least not one we can corroborate. The
anonymous author of her <italic>Passio</italic> draws heavily on the topoi
marking other early accounts of female martyrs. Hence Katherine
represents--indeed, she is "a prime example of"--what hagiographic
specialists call a "constructed saint," a "composite" of stock
literary elements (3). Of course, the idea of a constructed saint is
not new. What has changed--and what Walsh's study seems to reflect--is
the attitude of historians. To recall a phrase from the Bollandist
Hippolyte Delehaye (d. 1941), one of hagiography's most historically-
minded critics, Katherine's "borrowed clothing" (<italic>vêtement
d'emprunt</italic>), the cut-and-paste portrait that leads us to regard her
as a hagiographer's invention, is not as problematic as it once might
have been: "the important fact is that people believed in Katherine's
existence, this sincerely held belief providing impetus to the cult"
(4). Thus in terms of the study's approach, the author turns to the
hagiographic dossier not for its biographical historicity, but for
what it can tell us about the ways Katherine's cult fulfilled specific
needs and aspirations in the geographic regions where devotion to her
was strongest from c. 305 to c. 1200. These regions are: the Eastern
Roman Empire, Italy, Normandy and England. In focusing on the cult's
early formation in these areas, the author is also concentrating on a
period that has not received extensive attention from previous
scholars, most of whom treated the Katherine-cult in the later Middle
Ages.</p>
    <p>After establishing the book's approach, along with its geographic and
temporal scope, the <italic>Passio</italic> itself comes under scrutiny.
Although the second chapter is entitled "The Historical Katherine,"
Walsh is as emphatic here as she is at the very beginning and end of
her study: "the Passio provides no evidence that Katherine ever
existed as a living person" (1, 21, 143). Nonetheless, as the later
chapters show, the account of her martyrdom is of the greatest
importance, for it is largely through the Latin translation of the
<italic>Passio</italic>, originally in Greek, that knowledge of Katherine is
transmitted to the West. The other enabling factors in the cult's
earliest dissemination are the inclusion of Katherine in the liturgy
of the Eastern Church (Chapter 3) and her gradual rise to prominence
in the famous monastery on Sinai named after her (Chapter 4). The
study then considers the various routes and personal means by which
knowledge of the martyr reached Italy, where the story of Katherine's
opposition to a "tyrannical ruler" (58) bolstered the papal reform
movement during the investiture contest (Chapter 5). The sixth and
seventh chapters consist of "case studies" (6), in which the
transmission of the cult to Normandy and England is treated. These
later chapters, considered in light of the book's previous findings,
are most illuminating as they provide an opportunity to compare the
cult's development in different regions. Thus the final sections bring
to fruition the overarching goal of the investigation: to show how the
"the way the cult changed over time...illuminates...broader changes in
society" (3).</p>
    <p>Characterizing Walsh's treatment of the various themes outlined above
is a determined cautiousness in her handling of the evidence and
historiography. The care with which she treats both the sources and
the previous scholarship gives to the whole study an admirable
precision. In sifting through the material, she pinpoints key episodes
leading to Katherine's advancement. As has already been suggested, the
<italic>Passio</italic>, written sometime between the sixth and eighth century
(Walsh favors the latter), is crucial for the cult's establishment.
The rest of the early evidence is scanty, mostly snippets of
liturgical texts. Hence the <italic>Passio</italic> marks Katherine's most
significant break into the religious imagination, a break due in part
to the one distinctive element Walsh identifies--the saint's public
debate with Alexandria's learned men. With its colorful description of
her outsmarting and converting "fifty philosophers," who had set out
to deter her from Christianity (7), the <italic>Passio</italic> gives Katherine
a definable character. Considered in terms of what the story as a
whole offered, "the <italic>Passio</italic> was a major advance for the cult as
it enabled Katherine to develop a distinct <italic>persona</italic> with which
the faithful could identify--a prerequisite for any cult--that of a
beautiful, intelligent, noble-born virgin, capable of defying an
Emperor, of outwitting the finest minds in the Roman Empire and of
enduring torture and martyrdom for her Christian faith" (143).</p>
    <p>The <italic>Passio</italic> also deserves attention for a notable request.
Similar to the <italic>Life of Antony</italic>, in which the holy man asks that
his body be "buried in an unknown location" (13-14), the story of
Katherine's martyrdom recounts the saint's wish to be hidden after her
death instead of being "divided into relics" (16). In a manner that is
typical of the entire study, Walsh offers an explanation for this
feature of the narrative that ties the early representation of
Katherine to the larger historical situation, in this case Byzantium's
major crisis--the controversy over religious images. She suggests that
the martyr's prayer not to have her body divided "could be seen as
being broadly in keeping with the iconoclast viewpoint" (16). But in
qualifying her position, Walsh resists viewing the account of the
saint's request as the product of heavy-handed iconoclasm. The point
of the story is to attract rather than divide Christians. Given the
theological tensions of the period and region, the <italic>Passio</italic>'s
explanation for the missing remains would have appealed to a diverse
audience generally anxious over the status of holy objects. Thus the
absence of her relics during the first iconoclast period makes
Katherine "acceptable to all shades of religious opinion" (16).</p>
    <p>A particular era's solution, however, can become another one's
problem. As the discussion proceeds to the centuries following the
iconoclast controversy, we see how the missing relics impede the
cult's expansion. After all, medieval devotion is hard to generate
without some portion of the holy body accessible to the faithful. The
"cultural pressure" for saintly remains meant that if no "physical
manifestations" of Katherine were found, her cult could not "grow
beyond minor status" (39). The discovery of relics thus marks another
major episode in the history of Katherine's reception. Again the
<italic>Passio</italic> is the key, for it claims that angels buried the martyr
at a hidden spot on Mount Sinai, thus creating the expectation of
finding relics there. Although the <italic>inventio</italic> of Katherine's body
on the site are "extremely obscure" (39), by the twelfth century the
martyr's remains had been placed in the main monastery on Sinai. Most
significant--and this occurs more than once in the history of the
cult--with the relics as a focal point, Katherine's popularity began
to overshadow the institution's original dedication. Popes in 1217 and
in 1317 had referred in bulls to the "monastery of St. Mary." But in
1328 John XXII calls it "St Catherine's" (42). What is more, the
relics facilitated the spread of the cult; they created what we might
call the saint's transferability, for relics have a metonymical
quality--to have a part of a saint is to have the whole. Not only
could portions of the martyr be "miraculously detached" from her body
(73); pilgrims now had access to the "healing oil" exuding from
Katherine's bones (40, 88-89). By the 1040s, three fragments of her
had reached the Norman monastery of Holy Trinity, Rouen (76). It too
would undergo a change of name reflecting the popularity of Katherine.
Her cult was now on its way to becoming "well entrenched" (150) in
Western Europe, though with one significant departure from its
foundational source: "the later western texts of the <italic>Passio</italic>
omit the prayer not to divide her body" (14).</p>
    <p>In tracing the processes and phases of the cult's development in
different locations, Walsh is also able to establish a basis for
comparison. Normandy, for instance, follows a pattern "typical" of
most saints' cults, with the acquisition of relics being the catalyst
of growth (96). On the other hand, the reception of the Katherine-cult
in England follows a pattern akin to what Walsh identified in the
East, with liturgical commemoration and hagiographic tradition being
the primary means of establishing and sustaining her veneration.
Significantly, there are almost no primary relics of Katherine in
England. These are valuable observations, which bear on larger
questions surrounding the mechanisms at work in the cult of the saints
as a whole.</p>
    <p>There is, then, much to recommend this book, which also includes a
substantial appendix containing critical discussion and translations
of odes, miracle stories, and liturgical texts pertaining to Katherine
(though, unfortunately, there are no illustrations of the visual
representations mentioned throughout the work). It is clear that the
study is primarily addressed to historians; and the historical kernels
it finds are hard won. However, the author's attentiveness to the
rhetorical strategies marking the sources, along with the substantial
textual material appended to the study, will also make the book of
interest to literary critics and hagiographic researchers, especially
those investigating the depictions of female martyrs and saints.
Finally--and perhaps most important of all--the book offers a fine
example of the way scholarship intensely focused on very particular
matters can bring to light broader social and cultural practices that
characterize the interconnectedness of medieval religion and society.</p>
  </body>
</article>
