<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>TMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>The Medieval Review</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1096-746X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Indiana University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">baj9928.0811.00308.11.03</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>08.11.03, Beattie, Medieval Single Women (Katharine Geldenhuys)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Geldenhuys</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
          <aff>University of the Witwatersrand</aff>
          <address>
            <email>Katharine.Geldenhuys@wits.ac.za</email>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2008">
        <year>2008</year>
      </pub-date>
      <product product-type="book">
        <person-group>
          <name>
            <surname>Beattie, Cordelia</surname>
            <given-names/>
          </name>
        </person-group>
        <source>Medieval Single Women: The Politics of Social Classification in Late Medieval England.</source>
        <year iso-8601-date="2007">2007</year>
        <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
        <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
        <page-range>Pp. xii, 179</page-range>
        <price>$80</price>
        <isbn>978-0-19-928341-5</isbn>
      </product>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright 2008 Trustees of Indiana University. Indiana University provides the information contained in this file for non-commercial, personal, or research use only. All other use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly reproductions, redistribution, publication or transmission, whether by electronic means or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.</copyright-statement>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>Classification helps us to organise our world psychologically and in
this way is a useful tool for society. However, it is also at the root
of much prejudice and unfair discrimination--the case of
classification carried too far. My own home, South Africa, is of
course a prime example and although <italic>apartheid</italic> has, thankfully,
been abolished, it sadly remains a society strongly based on social
classification. The point of my detour of thousands of miles and years
is that Cordelia Beattie's book should be relevant not only to
scholars of gender and the Middle Ages but to the wider contemporary
community. Harping on the applicability of medieval studies to the
modern world is one of my personal bugbears but perhaps I am preaching
to the converted in this instance. So on with the business at hand...</p>
    <p>Cordelia Beattie states: "Classification is a political act in that it
entails value-laden choices about where divisions should be drawn, and
about what those divisions mean" (144). At the outset, Beattie
identifies two broad schemes of classification, to be used throughout
her text: interpretative schemes (involving the division of society
into subgroups) and the labelling of named individuals.</p>
    <p>The book is divided into five chapters, the first four concentrating
on interpretative schemes of organization and the fifth on the
labelling of individuals. The first chapter investigates
"Classification in Cultural Context" and points out the further
subdivision of distinctions between the classification of women in
terms of Christianity versus their legal categorization.</p>
    <p>Chapter two, taking the religious route (so important to European
medieval society), deals with "The Single Woman in Penitential
Discourse," specifically with regard to lechery and chastity. The
meaning of the term "single woman" as used in such discourse and how
it compares with the use of other groupings such as "widow," "virgin"
or "whore" in such texts is taken into account.</p>
    <p>The next two chapters explore the legal possibilities. In "The Single
Woman in Fiscal Discourse," Beattie uses the nominative tax returns of
1379 (when only unmarried women were taxed) from Bishop's Lynn,
Salisbury, Derby and Howdenshire for what they can reveal about how
these communities perceived unmarried females by considering the use
of the term "single woman" as opposed to other classificatory terms
like "widow" or occupation. Chapter four, "The Single Woman in Guild
Texts," examines 1388-9 guild returns and the register of the Guild of
the Holy Cross, Stratford-upon-Avon (1406-1535). Beattie argues that
the implications of the legal concept <italic>femme sole</italic> (a woman not
under the coverture of a man and consequently economically and legally
independent) are alluded to by the use of terms such as "single woman"
and "single sister" in such texts. In addition, in instances where the
category "maiden" is used in preference to "single woman," differing
attitudes to the sexuality of single men and single women may be
indicated.</p>
    <p>The final chapter focuses on "'Singlewoman' as a Personal Designation"
and contends that the term "singlewoman" was generally (though not
solely) used to refer to the woman who had never married.</p>
    <p>Throughout the text, Beattie highlights the intersections
religious/moral and legal/economic of the "singlewoman" category in
the late medieval documents which she examines. Finally, she
emphasises the importance of context in the consideration of the
implications of any use of the "singlewoman" label, as well as
indicating the importance of not taking any single example as
universal.</p>
    <p><italic>Medieval Single Women</italic> is written and presented with immense
clarity. The text mainly surveys practical documents to demonstrate
uses, and deduce values, of the term "singlewoman" in order to explore
the politics of this classificatory label in the societies of late
medieval England--rather than over-abundant philosophising on the
term. It would certainly serve as a useful resource for medieval
scholars whose work focuses on gender, while also having broader
applicability to other areas of social investigation.</p>
  </body>
</article>
