“Hello! Is Anybody Out There?” Amplifying a Social Media Network within a Science Methods Course during COVID-19

Main Article Content

Sumreen Ilyas Asim

Abstract

This article shares an elementary science methods course model design. The theoretical underpinnings of the course design integrated the six strands of learning science in informal science education (NRC, 2009).   The course design included the three types of informal learning environments. The piece of the course design that was especially useful to teacher candidates during COVID-19 was the designed learning environments.  The applicability of the designed learning environments helped teacher candidates to pivot during school building closures.  Fortunately, this model provided teacher candidates a solid foundation for them to utilize prior science methods course experiences to fill a need during these unprecedented times. Teacher candidates 1) shared teacher pedagogical knowledge, 2) built on ideas from the methods course, and 3) asked questions for support using social media. Social media platforms have the capacity to help teacher candidates find resources in real-time if a properly scaffolded experience is provided in methods courses. Overall, the implications of the course design lend themselves to most all teacher education programs. However, this article is specific to the design of an elementary science methods courses.  This science course model adds to the existing literature and attends a gap within the science education literature to support a diverse mix of needs due to the pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

(Author, 2016) Teaching beyond the walls: A mixed-method study of prospective elementary teacher’s beliefs systems about science instruction [PhD Dissertation]. University of North Texas, 212 p.
Bybee, R. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (with LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. New York, NY: Alta Mira Press.
Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2009). Science learning in a leisure setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 194-212. doi: 10.1002/tea.20319
Hsieh, B. (2017). Making and missing connections: Exploring Twitter chats as a learning tool in
a preservice education course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education, 17(4), 549-568.
Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge University Press.
McComas, W.F. (2014). Science Process Skills, p.89. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) The Language
of Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (p 89) DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_79
Melber, L. M., & Cox-Peterson, A. M. (2005). Teacher professional development and informal learning environment: Investigating partnerships and possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 103-120.
Menon, D. & Sadler, T. (2017). Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy for Preservice Elementary Teachers in Science Content Courses, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 835-855.
National Research Council. (2004). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2009). Learning in science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W., Shouse, & M .A. Feder (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2010) Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. M. Fenichel & H.A. Schweingruber (Eds.). A Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teaching Association (2012). NSTA position statement: Learning science in informal environments. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Available online: http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/informal.aspx
Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119.
Palmer, D. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353.
Rahm, J. (2014). Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 395-406.