“Hello! Is Anybody Out There?” Amplifying a Social Media Network within a Science Methods Course during COVID-19
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article shares an elementary science methods course model design. The theoretical underpinnings of the course design integrated the six strands of learning science in informal science education (NRC, 2009). The course design included the three types of informal learning environments. The piece of the course design that was especially useful to teacher candidates during COVID-19 was the designed learning environments. The applicability of the designed learning environments helped teacher candidates to pivot during school building closures. Fortunately, this model provided teacher candidates a solid foundation for them to utilize prior science methods course experiences to fill a need during these unprecedented times. Teacher candidates 1) shared teacher pedagogical knowledge, 2) built on ideas from the methods course, and 3) asked questions for support using social media. Social media platforms have the capacity to help teacher candidates find resources in real-time if a properly scaffolded experience is provided in methods courses. Overall, the implications of the course design lend themselves to most all teacher education programs. However, this article is specific to the design of an elementary science methods courses. This science course model adds to the existing literature and attends a gap within the science education literature to support a diverse mix of needs due to the pandemic.
Downloads
Article Details
In general, authors retain all rights to works they produce (If your work was written under a grant or you transferred your rights in writing check to be sure you still have copyright over the work). Since you have copyright in your work, The Hoosier Science Teacher (THST) published by The Hoosier Association of Science Teachers, Inc. (HASTI) and IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) needs your permission (also called a license) to publish and archive your work. By signing this form, you give permission as provided below. Essentially, the license allows THST to publish your work, post it online and preserve it for the long term. This may require THST to keep multiple back-up copies or convert your work to new hardware and software formats. This permission is non exclusive, which means you do not give up any copyright rights. You can republish your work elsewhere, put it online, translate it into another language, or make other uses. Like all forms of scholarly publishing, print or digital, some publishers will not want to republish material that has already been published. If you offer your work to another publisher, you should tell them it has been published before in The Hoosier Science Teacher.
By signing below, you agreed as follows:
- You grant to THST a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, world-wide license to publish, distribute, and archive your article in any format, now known or later invented, in any language, anywhere in the world.
- THST may transfer and sublicense this license to third parties.
- You retain copyright and all other rights not mentioned in this agreement.
- If you publish the article in any other format or venue, you will properly cite the journal as the first publisher.
- You agree to following license for THST to post and archive the Article:
- By signing and submitting this license, you (the author(s) or copyright owner) grant to THST the non-exclusive right to reproduce, translate (as defined below), and/or distribute your submission (including the abstract) worldwide in print and electronic format and in any medium, including but not limited to audio or video.
- You agree that THST may, without changing the content, translate the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation.
- You agree that THST may deposit your submission into IUScholarWorks on your behalf.
- You also agree that THST may keep more than one copy of this submission for purposes of security, back-up and preservation.
- You represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights contained in this license. You also represent that your submission does not, to the best of your knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
If the submission contains material for which you do not hold copyright, you represent that you have obtained the unrestricted permission of the copyright owner to grant THST the rights required by this license, and that such third-party owned material is clearly identified and acknowledged within the text or content of the submission.
IF THE SUBMISSION IS BASED UPON WORK THAT HAS BEEN SPONSORED OR SUPPORTED BY AN AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION OTHER THAN THE HOOSIER SCIENCE TEACHER or HASTI Inc, YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE FULFILLED ANY RIGHT OF REVIEW OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY SUCH CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT.
THST will clearly identify your name(s) as the author(s) or owner(s) of the submission, and will not make any alteration, other than as allowed by this license, to your submission.
References
Bybee, R. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (with LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. New York, NY: Alta Mira Press.
Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2009). Science learning in a leisure setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 194-212. doi: 10.1002/tea.20319
Hsieh, B. (2017). Making and missing connections: Exploring Twitter chats as a learning tool in
a preservice education course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education, 17(4), 549-568.
Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge University Press.
McComas, W.F. (2014). Science Process Skills, p.89. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) The Language
of Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (p 89) DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_79
Melber, L. M., & Cox-Peterson, A. M. (2005). Teacher professional development and informal learning environment: Investigating partnerships and possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 103-120.
Menon, D. & Sadler, T. (2017). Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy for Preservice Elementary Teachers in Science Content Courses, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 835-855.
National Research Council. (2004). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2009). Learning in science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W., Shouse, & M .A. Feder (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2010) Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. M. Fenichel & H.A. Schweingruber (Eds.). A Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teaching Association (2012). NSTA position statement: Learning science in informal environments. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Available online: http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/informal.aspx
Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119.
Palmer, D. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353.
Rahm, J. (2014). Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 395-406.