The Stuff of Fiction: Digital Editing, Multiple Drafts and the Extended Mind

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 5, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/TCv8i1.5048

Main Article Content

Dirk Van Hulle

Abstract

Since genetic criticism regards modern manuscripts as a research object in and of itself, it objects to an editorial practice that treats manuscript studies as a mere tool towards the making of a scholarly edition. Still, an exchange of ideas between genetic criticism and scholarly editing can be mutually beneficial and may work in two directions. This essay therefore starts from digital scholarly editing, more specifically from recent developments in computer-assisted collation of multiple draft versions, to see how it can contribute to the study of modern manuscripts. The argument is that the combination of textual scholarship and genetic criticism can be an effective instrument for literary critics, enabling them to study the material aspect of the writing process as an inherent part of what cognitive philosophy calls “the extended mind”; and that this extensiveness does not only apply to the writer’s mind, but that an awareness of manuscripts as a crucial part of the “stuff of fiction” can also contribute to a better understanding of literary evocations of the fictional mind.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2013)
Section
Editing Options

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (see:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors warrant that their submission is their own original work, and that they have the right to grant the rights contained in this license. Authors also warrant that their submission does not, to the best of your knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright. If the submission contains material for which an author does not hold the copyright, authors warrant that they have obtained the unrestricted permission of the copyright owner to grant Indiana University the rights required by this license, and that such third-party owned material is clearly identified and acknowledged within the text or content of their submission.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

References

Beckett, Samuel. 1984. “Dante . . . Bruno.Vico..Joyce”. In Disjecta, edited by Ruby Cohn. New York: Grove Press. 19–33.

———. 2009. Company, Ill Seen Ill Said, Worstward Ho, Stirrings Still, edited by Dirk Va n H u l l e. London: Faber and Faber.

———. 2011. The Beckett Digital Manuscript Project, Module 1: Stirrings Still / Soubre-sauts and ‘Comment dire’ / ‘what is the word’: An Electronic Genetic Edition, edited by Dirk Va n H u l l e and Vincent Neyt, Brussels: ASP / University Press Antwerp. http://www.beckettarchive.org.

Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Exten-sion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2012. “Embodied, Embedded, and Extended Cognition”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by Keith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, 275–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Andy, and David J. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind”. Analysis 58: 10 –23.

de Biasi, Pierre-Marc. 2000. La génétique des textes, Paris: Nathan.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.

Ferrer, Daniel. 1998. “The Open Space of the Draft Page: James Joyce and Modern Manuscripts”. In The Iconic Page in Manuscript, Print, and Digital Culture, edited by George Bornstein and Theresa Tinkle, 249–67. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Ferrer, Daniel. 2010. “Critique génétique et Philologie: racine de la différence”. Gen-esis 30: 21–3.

Ferrer, Daniel. 2011. Logiques du brouillon: Modèles pour un critique génétique. Paris: Seuil.

Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Hassocks, UK: The Harvester Press.

Harker, James. 2011. “Misperceiving Virginia Woolf”. Journal of Modern Literature34: 1–21.

Jefferson, Thomas. 2003. “The Autobiography of Thomas Jefferson” (fragment). In The Norton Anthology of American Literature, edited by Nina Baym et al., 336–42. New York / London: W.W. Norton.

Kahler, Erich von. 1973. The Inward Turn of Narrative, translated by Richard and Clara Winston. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lauwereyns, Jan. 2010. The Anatomy of Bias: How Neural Circuits Weigh the Options. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Menary, Richard. 2007. “Writing as Thinking”. Language Sciences 5: 621–32.

———. 2010a. “Introduction”. In The Extended Mind, edited by Richard Menary, 1–25. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Menary, Richard, ed. 2010b. The Extended Mind, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Stewart, John, Olivier Gapenne and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, ed. 2011. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.

TEI Special Interest Group. 2013 (accessed). An Encoding Model for Genetic Edi-tions. http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Working/tcw19.html

Van Hulle, Dirk. 2012. “The Extended Mind and Multiple Drafts: Beckett’s Models of the Mind and the Postcognitivist Paradigm”. Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui24: 277–90.

Woolf, Virginia. 1972. “Modern Fiction”. In Collected Essays, vol. 2. London: Hogarth Press. 103 –10.

———. 2000. Selected Short Stories. London: Penguin Modern Classics.