Clusters and Graphs Revealing and Modeling Documentary Indefiniteness

Main Article Content

Michael Fox

Abstract

The documentary record of interrelated, multimedia literary works is riddled with indefiniteness. The order of their materials is often uncertain, as is the medium that should serve as their point of reference. This article argues that such common and related indefiniteness, like ambiguity and genetic lineage, whether revealed through traditional scholarly methods or computational ones, can be modeled using graph technology. Graph technology, moreover, can be used to model much more about these literary works, from their atomic documentary features to their higher-order features. The article uses as its example Jaime de Angulo’s Old Time Stories, a Modernist American masterpiece consisting of voice, text, and image. Graph modeling, or graph editing, the work results in a fine-grained, computationally accessible representation of it as it really is in all its indefinite and networked nature. Such a representation lends itself to typical hermeneutic investigations enhanced by the power of inferential queries, and it can even serve as an actually authentic source for more quantitative investigations. Most important, like all non-digital natural-language based artifacts, it can also be endlessly modified by future editors without ever giving up from its structure the history of its own making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Essays
Author Biography

Michael Fox, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Michael Fox is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the School of Information and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). Previously, he was an Assistant Editor of the William Blake Archive for many years and a Senior Lecturer for the program in Digital Studies of Language, Culture, and History at the University of Chicago. He has a PhD in English from UNC. And currently he is completing his first book, under contract, on subtle yet significant ways in which authors engage with history as both subject and genre, and in which historians, in turn, employ literary techniques. It also offers new approaches to longstanding challenges in the discipline of literary history itself.