“Genesis is a great lie, but”

Main Article Content

Dovilė Gervytė

Abstract

It is increasingly accepted in textual studies that to approach the genesis of a literary work is to narrate how its textual versions were produced. In other words, understanding the development of a work encourages a reflection on the strategies used to reveal the reconstruction of its genesis for the reader. Since the main objective of genetic analysis is to trace back the processual aspects of materially recorded changes, the question arises as to how the dynamics of writing are implied by the very narration of reconstruction. In light of this discussion, the present article examines the avant-texte of John Fowles’s novel The Magus, focusing on the work’s closure which has repeatedly been debated by critics yet not addressed from the perspective of genetic analysis. This case problematizes the task of representing the complex genetic links comprehensively and promotes the view that the versions of the novel’s ending ought to be treated as a homogenous structure rather than a set of heterogeneous units.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Essays
Author Biography

Dovilė Gervytė, Vilnius University

Dovilė Gervytė is a PhD candidate at Vilnius University. Her research centers on genetic criticism of modern prose manuscripts produced by British and Lithuanian authors (John Fowles, Muriel Spark; Tomas Vaiseta, Jurgis Kunčinas). She is currently writing her dissertation "The Play of Genesis' Agents in Modern Manuscripts", in which she attempts to conceptualize the production of literary works in their social, historical and material environment. Her scholarly pursuits include textual scholarship, non-fiction editing and publishing, typography, digital humanities. She co-edited the Lithuanian poet Maironis’s The Voices of Spring: A Digital Archive and a Scholarly Edition (http://www.pb.flf.vu.lt/).