Masters and Commanders: Considering the Tyranny of the Edited Text
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay considers the problematic nature of textual editing in the age of digitized and digital editions. Scholars consistently seek to identify “best” editions and to establish the identities of scribes like Adam Pynkhurst beyond a reasonable doubt, but experience shows how difficult such identifications can be, even when undertaken by qualified scholars with full access to the texts in question. Given the instability of technologies, the need for sustainability in digital platforms, and the difficulties in producing “final” print editions of medieval texts that exist in multiple witnesses, the essay argues that editorial closure may be an impossible goal.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (see:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors warrant that their submission is their own original work, and that they have the right to grant the rights contained in this license. Authors also warrant that their submission does not, to the best of your knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright. If the submission contains material for which an author does not hold the copyright, authors warrant that they have obtained the unrestricted permission of the copyright owner to grant Indiana University the rights required by this license, and that such third-party owned material is clearly identified and acknowledged within the text or content of their submission.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
References
Edward s, A.S.G. 2014. Review of Scribes and the City. The Library 15.1: 79– 81.
Machan, Tim Williiam. 1994. Textual Criticism and Middle English Texts. Charlot-tesville: University of Virginia Press, 1994.
McGann, Jerome. 2011. Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come.Connexions. http://cnx.org/contents/PVdH0-lD@1.3:kfHOuf NB@2/Introduction.
Millet, Bella. 2013. “Whatever Happened to Electronic Editing?” In Probable Truth: Editing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century. Edited by Vincent Gillespie and Anne Hudson, 39–54. Turnhout: Brepols.
Morey, James H. 2012. “Introduction”. The Prik of Conscience. TEAMS Edition. Rochester: TEAMS Middle English Text Series. http://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/text/morey-prik-of-conscience-introduction.
Penn In Hand. Ms. Codex 201 (New Testament in the Translation of John Wycliffe). http://dla.library.upenn.edu/dla/medren/pageturn.html?id=MEDREN_1551783.
Reimer, Stephen. 2004. “Unbinding Lydgate’s Lives of Saints Edmund and Fremund”. In The Book Unbound: Editing and Reading Medieval Manuscripts and Texts, 167–89. Edited by Siân Echard and Stephen Partridge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
Roberts, Jane. 2011. “On Giving Scribe B a Name and a Clutch of London Manu-scripts from c. 1400”. Medium Aevum 80: 247–70.
Turville-Petre, Thorlac. 2013. “Editing Electronic Texts”. In Probable Truth: Edit-ing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century, 55–70. Edited by Vincent Gillespie and Anne Hudson. Turnhout: Brepols.
Warner, Lawrence. 2015. “Scribes, Misattributed: Hoccleve and Pinkhurst”. Stud-ies in the Age of Chaucer 37: 55 –10 0.