A Methodological Approach for Intra – Site Analysis of Prehistoric Settlements
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the IGEAN (Innovative Geophysical Approaches for the Study of Early Agricultural Villages of Neolithic) project, more than 20 Neolithic-Early Bronze Age (EBA) settlements in the area of Thessaly, Central Greece, were investigated through various geophysical approaches. The prehistoric settlements of Almyros2, Almyriotiki, Perdika1 and Rizomilos2 have been selected to be studied in-depth about their intra-site spatial organization. Here, for sake of conciseness, only the results about Almyros2 and Perdika1 will be presented, assuming these settlements belong both to the Middle Neolithic period. This study aims to propose a combined methodological approach in order to examine if such settlements were conceived following a determined spatial organization. Four different technologies have been implemented, including geophysical prospection, space syntax, 3D modelling and 3D visibility analysis. The promising results obtained from the combination of such technologies, hopefully, will encourage specialists to adopt, compare and develop integrated methodologies more often, especially when excavations are limited.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
From 18 May 2018, the contents of Studies in Digital Heritage are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Our submitting authors pay no fee and retain the copyright to their own work.
How this works: to submit their work to the journal, authors grant Studies in Digital Heritage a nonexclusive license to distribute the work according to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Once an article is published, anyone is free to share and adapt its contents—provided only that they do so for noncommercial purposes and properly attribute the shared or adapted information. Details of these terms can be found on the Creative Commons website.
Download SDH’s full author agreement here
Studies in Digital Heritage will insert the following note at the end of any work published in the journal:
© [Year] by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
References
Alexakis, D., Sarris, A., Astaras, T., Albanakis, K., 2011. Integrated GIS, Remote Sensing and Geomorphologic Approaches for the Reconstruction of the Landscape Habitation of Thessaly during the Neolithic Period. Journal of Archaeological Science 38, 89–100.
Al_Sayed, K., Turner, A., Hillier, B., Iida, S., Penn, A., 2014. Space Syntax Methodology. Barlett School of Architecture,UCL, London.
Andreou, S., 2001. Exploring the patterns of power in the Bronze Age settlements of northern Greece. Urbanism in the Aegean Bronze Age 160–173.
Brown, F., 1990. Comment on Chapman: some cautionary notes on the application of spatial measures to prehistoric settlements, in: The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 93–109.
Chapman, J., 1990. Social inequality on Bulgarian tells and the Varna problem, in: The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 49–92.
Clark, D.L.C., 2007. Viewing the Liturgy: A Space Syntax Study of Changing Visibility and Accessibility in the Development of the Byzantine Church in Jordan. World Archaeology 39, 84–104.
Cutting, M., 2003. The Use of Spatial Analysis to Study Prehistoric Settlement Architecture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00001
Demoule, J.-P., Perlès, C., 1993. The Greek Neolithic: A New Review. Journal of World Prehistory 7, 355–416.
Earl, G., 2005. Wandering the House of the Birds: reconstruction and perception at Roman Italica, in: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology, and Cultural Heritage, Short Papers. Presented at the The 6th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, CNR Pisa, Pisa.
Efstratiou, N., 2017. Social Interaction in the Farming Communities of Neolithic Greece: Archaeological Perceptions, in: Communities, Landscapes, and Interactions in Neolithic Greece: Proceedings of the International Conference, Rethymno 29-30 May, 2015, Archaeological Series. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp. 319–323.
Fisher, K., 2009. Placing Social Interaction: An Integrative Approach to Analyzing Past Built Environments. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28, 439–457.
Fisher, P., Farrelly, C., Maddocks, A., Ruggles, C., 1997. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science 24, 581–592.
Halstead, P., 1999. Neighbours from hell? The household in Neolithic Greece, in: Neolithic Society in Greece. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, pp. 77–95.
Harrison, Laura.K., 2021. Power and ritual practice in the Early Bronze III period at Seyitomer Hoyuk: An Integrative Analysis of Movement, Interaction, and Visual Perception, in: The Early Bronze Age in Western Anatolia Edited by Laura K. Harrison, A. Nejat Bilgen and Asuman Kapuci, The Institute for European and Mediterranean Archaeology Distinguished Monograph Series. SUNY Press, New York, pp. 163–188.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., 1984. The Social Logic of Space by Bill Hillier. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
Homann-Vorgin, A., 2005. Space Syntax in Maya Architecture, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Space Syntax. Delft, pp. 279–292.
Kalayci, T., Simon, F.-X., Sarris, A., 2017. A Manifold Approach for the Investigation of Early and Middle Neolithic Settlements in Thessaly, Greece. Geosciences 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030079
Kotsakis, K., 1999. What Tells can tell: social space and settlement in the Greek Neolithic. Neolithic Society in greece 66–76.
Krahtopoulou, A., 2019. Current approaches to the Neolithic of Thessaly. Archaeological Reports 65, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0570608419000048
Landeschi, G., Dell’Unto, N., Lundqvist, K., Ferdani, D., Campanaro, D.M., Leander Touati, A.-M., 2016. 3D-GIS as a platform for visual analysis: Investigating a Pompeian house. Journal of Archaeological Science 65, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.002
Loots, L., Nackaerts, K., Waelkens, M., 1999. Fuzzy viewshed analysis of the Hellenistic city defence system at Sagalassos, Turkey. Presented at the Archaeology in the age of the internet - CAA97: computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. 25th anniversary conference, British archaeological reports, Birmingham, p. ?-?
Manzetti, M.C., 2016. 3D visibility analysis as a tool to validate ancient theatre reconstructions: the case of the large Roman theatre of Gortyn. Virtual Archaeology Review 7, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2016.5922
Nanoglou, S., 2008. Building biographies and households. Aspects of community life in Neolithic northern Greece. Journal of Social Archaeology 8, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605307086081
Nanoglou, S., 2001. Social and monumental space in Neolithic Thessaly, Greece. European Journal of Archaeology 4, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.2001.4.3.303
Osborne, J., 2012. Communicating Power in the Bit Hilani Palace. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 29–66.
Paliou, E., 2018. Visual perception in past built environments: theorethical and procedural issues in the archaeological application of three-dimensional visibility analysis, in: Digital Geoarchaeology, Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Cham, pp. 65–80.
Paliou, E., D.W., 2007. Integrating Spatial Analysis and 3D Approaches to the Study of Visual Space: Late Bronze Age Akrotiri, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Conference. Presented at the The world is in your eyes. CAA2005. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology., Tomar, pp. 307–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-2769
Paliou, E., Wheatley, D., Earl, G., 2011. Three-dimensional visibility analysis of architectural spaces: iconography and visibility of the wall paintings of Xeste 3 (Late Bronze Age Akrotiri). Journal of Archaeological Science 38, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.016
Papadopoulos, C., Hamilakis, Y., Kyparissi-Apostolika, N., 2015. Light in a Neolithic dwelling: Building 1 at Koutroulou Magoula (Greece). Antiquity 89, 1034–1050. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2015.53
Parkinson, W., Duffy, P., 2007. Fortifications and enclosures in European prehistory: a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Archaeological Research 15, 97–141.
Ruggles, C.L.N., Medyckyj-Scott, D.J., Gruffydd, A., 1993. Multiple viewshed analysis using GIS and its archaeological applications: a case study in northern Mull, in: Andresen, J., T. Madsen and I. Scollar(Eds.), Computing the Past. Presented at the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp. 125–132.
Sarris, A., 2013. Multi+ or Manifold Geophysical Prospection?, in: Archaeology in the Digital Era, E-Papers. Presented at the 40th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA2012), Southampton, 26-30 March 2012, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 761–770.
Shapiro, J., 2005. A space syntax analysis of Arroyo Hondo Pueblo, New Mexico: community formation in the Northern Rio Grande. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.
Thaler, U., 2005. Narrative and Syntax> new perspectives on the Late Bronze Age palace of Pylos, Greece, in: Space Syntax 5th International Symposium. Presented at the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Techne Press, Amsterdam, pp. 323–339.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., Penn, A., 2001. From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space. Environ Plann B Plann Des 28, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2684
Van Nes, A., 2014. Indicating street vitality in excavated towns: Spatial configurative analyses applied to Pompeii, in: Spatial Analysis and Social Spaces: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Interpretation of Prehistoric and Historic Built Environments, Topoi. Berlin Studies of the Ancient World. De Gruyter, pp. 277–295.
Wace, A.J.B., Thompson, M.S., 1912. Prehistoric Thessaly. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Westgate, R., 2007. House and Society in Classical and Hellenistic Crete: A Case Study in Regional Variation. AJA 111, 423–457. https://doi.org/10.3764/aja.111.3.423
Wheatley, D., 1995. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application, in: Archaeology and GIS: A European Perspective. Routlege, London, pp. 171–186.