Digital Vacone The Upper Sabina Tiberina Project’s Transition from 2B Pencils to 3D Mesh
Main Article Content
Abstract
Between 2016 and 2018, excavations at the Roman villa of Vacone, carried out by the Upper Sabina Tiberina Project, transitioned to completely digital recording practices. The methodological shift was accompanied by a three-year campaign of backfill removal and cleaning, which allowed most of the villa’s extant architecture and décor uncovered since 2012 to be digitized. Moreover, a new documentation protocol was established that employs photogrammetry in lieu of scale drawing to model the three-dimensional spatial characteristics of every archaeological context. Notable artifacts were also modeled to facilitate off-site study. The excavation’s experiences with this conversion offer valuable lessons for other long-term archaeological projects contemplating a similar shift amid active fieldwork. The project’s digital recording team developed a methodology for layer-by-layer modeling that ensures precise alignment between stratigraphic contexts using fixed markers. From these, standard 2D products (orthomosaic plans and digital elevation models [DEMs]) were produced. A similar technique was used for generating 2D orthomosaics of vertical features (such as walls and stratigraphic sections) without the need to take numerous measurements on the vertical surface (e.g., with a prismless total station). Similarly, the generated data can create 2D sections along any arbitrary line even after the strata have been removed. Beyond simply replicating traditional two-dimensional records, the 3D data have proven essential for visualizing the interrelation of above and below ground spaces, and for analyzing a terraced structure built on several levels. Composite 3D models, hosted online, are also an effective tool for public outreach with stakeholders in the local community, as well as the general public.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
From 18 May 2018, the contents of Studies in Digital Heritage are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Our submitting authors pay no fee and retain the copyright to their own work.
How this works: to submit their work to the journal, authors grant Studies in Digital Heritage a nonexclusive license to distribute the work according to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Once an article is published, anyone is free to share and adapt its contents—provided only that they do so for noncommercial purposes and properly attribute the shared or adapted information. Details of these terms can be found on the Creative Commons website.
Download SDH’s full author agreement here
Studies in Digital Heritage will insert the following note at the end of any work published in the journal:
© [Year] by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
References
Giovanna Alvino. 2009. Vacone, Forma Urbis, n.9, Roma: E.S.S. Editorial Service System.
Archaeology Data Service. 2020. Guides to Good Practice. Retrieved December 3, 2020 from https://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/g2gp/Main
Dylan Bloy, Giulia Masci, Gary Farney, and Matthew Notarian. 2014. The Upper Sabina Tiberina Project: prima campagna di scavo a Vacone (2012). In Elena Calandra, Giuseppina Ghini, and Zaccaria Mari, eds. Lazio e Sabina 10, Atti del Decimo Incontro di Studi sul Lazio e la Sabina (Roma, 4-6 giugno 2013). Roma: Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici del Lazio, 57-62.
Dylan Bloy, Gary Farney, Tyler Franconi, Giulia Masci, Candace Rice, and Matthew Notarian. 2016. The Upper Sabina Tiberina Project. I risultati della seconda campagna di scavo a Vacone (RI), in Giuseppina Ghini, Zaccaria Mari, and Alfonsina Russo Tagliente, eds. Lazio e Sabina 11, Atti dell’Undicesimo Incontro di Studi sul Lazio e la Sabina (Roma, 4-6 giugno 2014). Roma: Quasar.
Michael J. Boyd, Rosie Campbell, Roger C. P. Doonan, Catherine Douglas, Georgios Gavalas, Myrsini Gkouma, Claire Halley, Bruce Hartzler, James A. Herbst, Hallvard R. Indgjerd, Ayla Krijnen, Irini Legaki, Evi Margaritis, Nathan Meyer, Ioanna Moutafi, Nefeli Pirée Iliou, David A. Wylie, and Colin Renfrew. 2021. Open Area, Open Data: Advances in Reflexive Archaeological Practice, Journal of Field Archaeology 46, 2 (2021), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1859780
William Caraher. 2016. Slow Archaeology: Technology, Efficiency, and Archaeological Work, in Erin W. Averett, Derek Counts, and Jody Gordon, eds. Mobilizing the Past: Recent Approaches to Archaeological Fieldwork in a Digital Age. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, 421–441.
Mary Clarke. 2015. The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record, Advances in Archaeological Practice 3, 4 (2015), 313–30. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.313
Derek B. Counts, Erin Walcek Averett, Kevin Garstki, and Michael K. Toumazou. 2020. Visualizing Votive Practice: Exploring Limestone and Terracotta Sculpture from Athienou-Malloura through 3D Models. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota. https://thedigitalpress.org/vvp/
Mario Borrero and Luke Stroth. 2020. A Proposal for the Standardized Reporting of Error and Paradata Regarding Structure from Motion (SfM) 3D Models Used in Recording and Consolidating Archaeological Architecture. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8,4 (2020), 376-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2020.11
Cultural Heritage Imaging. 2020. Photogrammetry. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from http://culturalheritageimaging.org/Technologies/Photogrammetry/
Nicoló Dell’Unto, Anne-Marie Leander Touati, Matteo Dellepiane, Marco Callieri, Daniele Ferdani, and Stefan Lindgren. 2013. Digital reconstruction and visualization in archaeology: Case-study drawn from the work of the Swedish Pompeii Project. In 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage). IEEE, 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743804
Emanuel Demetrescu. 2015. Archaeological Stratigraphy as a Formal Language for Virtual Reconstruction. Theory and Practice. Journal of Archaeological Science 57 (2015), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.004
Emanuel Demetrescu. 2018. Virtual Reconstruction as a Scientific Tool: The Extended Matrix and Source-Based Modelling Approach. In Sander Münster, Kristina Friedrichs, Florian Niebling and Agnieska Seidel-Grzesińska, eds. Digital Research and Education in Archi¬tectural Heritage. Cham: Springer, 102–116.
Jeroen P. De Reu, Philippe De Smedt, Davy Herremans, Marc van Meirvenne, Pieter Laloo, and Wim De Clercq. 2014. On Introducing an Image-based 3D Reconstruction Method in Archaeological Excavation Practice. Journal of Archaeological Science 41 (2014), 251–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.020
Daniele Ferdani Emanuel Demetrescu, Marco Cavalieri, Gloriana Pace, and Sara Lenzi. 2019. 3D Modelling and Visualization in Field Archaeology. From Survey to Interpretation of the Past Using Digital Technologies. Groma 4 (2019), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12977/groma26
Tyler Franconi, Candace Rice, Dylan Bloy, and Gary Farney. 2019. Excavations at the Roman Villa of Vacone (Lazio) by the Upper Sabina Tiberina Project, 2012-2018. In Carla Sfameni and Monica Volpi, eds. Oltre la Villa: Richerche nei siti archeologici del territorio di Cottanello, Montasola, Configni e Vacone. Roma: Arbor Sapientiae, 109-136.
Kevin Garstki. 2020. Digital Innovations in European Archaeology. Elements in the Archaeology of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108881425
Kevin Garstki, Marcus Schulenburg, and Robert A. Cook (2018): Practical Application of Digital Photogrammetry for Fieldwork in the American Midwest: An Example from the Middle Ohio Valley. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology (2018), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01461109.2018.1452364
Marina Gavryushkina. 2018. Layer by (3D) Layer: 3D GIS Stratigraphic Analysis of Chlorakas-Palloures, Cyprus. Master’s thesis. University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Juliet Hardesty, Jennifer Johnson, Jamie Wittenberg, Nathan Hall, Matt Cook, Zack Lischer-Katz, Zhiwu Xie, and Robert McDonald. 2020. 3D Data Repository Features, Best Practices, and Implications for Preservation Models: Findings from a National Forum. College & Research Libraries 81, 5 (2020), 789. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.789
Charles W. Koenig, Mark D. Willis, Stephen L. Black. 2017. Beyond the Square Hole: Application of Structure from Motion Photogrammetry to Archaeological Excavation. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5, 1 (2017), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2016.8
Colleen Morgan and Holly Wright. 2018. Pencils and Pixels: Drawing and Digital Media in Archaeological Field Recording. Journal of Field Archaeology 43, 2 (2018), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488
Matthew Notarian, Dylan Bloy, and Gary Farney. 2016. Forgery and the Antiquarian Tradition: The Identification of Horace’s Sabine Villa at Vacone, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 61 (2016), 41-58.
Giacomo Landeschi. 2019. Rethinking GIS, three-dimensionality and space perception in archaeology. World Archaeology 51, 1 (2019), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1463171
Rachel Opitz. 2015. Three-Dimensional Field Recording in Archaeology: An Example from Gabii, in Brandon Olson and William Caraher, eds. Visions of Substance: 3D Imaging in Mediterranean Archaeology. Grand Forks: Digital Press, University of North Dakota, 73-86.
Rachel Opitz, Marcello Mogetta, and Nicola Terrenato. 2016. A Mid-Republican House from Gabii. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wojciech Ostrowski, Lukasz Miszk, and Weronika Winiarska. 2018. Three-Dimensional Stratigraphy Reconstruction and GIS - Postprocessing Issues in Archaeological Field 3D Documentation, Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization 22 (2018), 219-40. https://doi.org/10.12797/SAAC.22.2018.22.10
Federica Pollari, Candace Rice, Gary Farney, and Tyler Franconi. 2018. Villa Romana di Vacone (RI): Nuovi mosaici dal settore urbano della villa, in Claudia Angelelli, Daniela Massara, and Andrea Paribeni, eds. Atti del XXII Colloquio dell’Associazione Italiana per lo Studio e la Conservazaione del Mosacio. Narni: Edizioni Scripta Manent di Tipografia Mancini s.a.s., 805-809.
Samantha Porter, Morgan Roussel, and Marie Soressi. 2016. A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field: Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice 4, 1 (2016), 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71
Adam Rabinowitz. 2019. Communicating in Three Dimensions: Questions of Audience and Reuse in 3D Excavation Documentation Practice. SDH 3, 1 (2019), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v3i1.25386
Candace Rice, Federica Pollari, and Gary Farney. 2017. I mosaici imperiali della villa romana di vacone (RI), in Claudia Angelelli, Daniela Massara, and Andrea Paribeni, eds. Atti del XXII Colloquio dell’Associazione Italiana per lo Studio e la Conservazione del Mosaico, Matera 16-19 marzo 2016. Tivoli: Edizioni Scripta Manent di Tipografia Mancini s.a.s., 303-311.
Heather Richards-Rissetto, Jennifer von Schwerin. 2017. A Catch 22 of 3D Data Sustainability: Lessons in 3D Archaeological Data Management & Accessibility. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 6 (2017), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2017.04.005
Christopher H. Roosevelt, Peter Cobb, Emanuel Moss, Brandon R. Olson, and Sinan Ünlüsoy. 2015. Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Field Archaeology 40 (2015), 325–346. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
Philip Sapirstein. 2016. Accurate Measurement with Photogrammetry at Large Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 66 (2016), 137–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.002
Philip Sapirstein. 2020. Hand Drawing versus Computer Vision in Archaeological Recording. SDH 4,2 (2020), 134-159. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v4i2.31520
Philip Sapirstein and Sarah Murray. 2017. Establishing best practices for photogrammetric recording during archaeological fieldwork. Journal of Field Archaeology 42, 4 (2017), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2017.1338513
James Taylor, Justine Issavi, Åsa Berggren, Dominik Lukas, Camilla Mazzucato, Burcu Tung and Nicoló Dell'Unto. 2018. 'The Rise of the Machine': the impact of digital tablet recording in the field at Çatalhöyük, Internet Archaeology 47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.47.1
Mark D. Willis, Charles W. Koenig, Stephen L. Black, and Amanda M. Castañeda. 2016. Archaeological 3D Mapping: The Structure from Motion Revolution. Journal of Texas Archeology and History 3 (2016), 1-36.
