Main Article Content
The recent “digital turn” in archaeology has driven methodological advances and opened new research avenues, with wide ranging impacts at multiple scales. The proliferation of methods such as 3D imaging, remote sensing, laser scanning and photogrammetry has led to the datafication of archaeology [Caraher 2016: 467, Mayer-Schönberger et al. 2013: 73]. This process is most evident in research on digital surveying, data visualization, digital archiving, mapping, and image processing, which prioritize the creation and manipulation of large digital datasets. These research avenues often generate more intellectual traffic than “slow archaeology” routes [Caraher 2016], which adopt a reflexive approach to knowledge production, embrace the inherent complexity of digital datasets, emphasize craft modes of archaeological documentation [Perry 2015], and “highlight the value of small and properly contextualized data” [Kansa 2016: 466]. Confronting the growing tension between big data and slow archaeology will be an iterative process. It will evolve as researchers and other stakeholder groups assess the value of digital approaches to preserving, communicating, and interpreting the past as it relates to the present. This special issue of Studies in Digital Heritage is the outcome of a symposium at the 2018 Society for American Archaeology (SAA) conference in Washington, D.C., entitled “Digital Heritage Technologies, Applications, and Impacts.” The articles within contribute to this dialogue by critically assessing the challenges and successes of recent digital heritage projects in museums, teaching and fieldwork contexts.
From 18 May 2018, the contents of Studies in Digital Heritage are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Our submitting authors pay no fee and retain the copyright to their own work.
How this works: to submit their work to the journal, authors grant Studies in Digital Heritage a nonexclusive license to distribute the work according to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Once an article is published, anyone is free to share and adapt its contents—provided only that they do so for noncommercial purposes and properly attribute the shared or adapted information. Details of these terms can be found on the Creative Commons website.
Studies in Digital Heritage will insert the following note at the end of any work published in the journal:
© [Year] by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
William Caraher. 2016. Slow Archaeology: Technology, Efficiency, and Archaeological Work. In Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future, Erin Walcek Averett, Jody Michael Gordon and Derek B Counts, eds. The Digital Press @ The University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, 421–441.
Maria Economou. 2015. Heritage in the Digital Age. A Companion to Herit. Stud. September (2015), 215–228. DOI: 10.1002/9781118486634.ch15
Jeremy Huggett. 2015. Challenging Digital Archaeology. Open Archaeol. 1, 1 (2015), 79–85. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2015-0003
Muhammad Hassan Jamil, Prince Steven Annor, Jonathan Sharfman, Robert Parthesius, Isabelle Garachon, and Mohamad Eid. 2018. The Role of Haptics in Digital Archaeology and Heritage Recording Processes. HAVE 2018 - IEEE Int. Symp. Haptic, Audio-v. Environ. Games, Proc. (2018), 51–56. DOI: 10.1109/HAVE.2018.8547505
Sarah Whitcher Kansa and Eric C. Kansa. 2018. Data beyond the Archive in Digital Archaeology: An Introduction to the Special Section. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 6, 2 (2018), 89–92. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.7
Eric C. Kansa. 2016. Click Here to Save the Past. In Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeo, Erin Walcek Averett, Jody Michael Gordon and Derek B Counts, eds. The Digital Press @ The University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, 443–472.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: a Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
G. Moshenska. 2009. Introduction: public archaeology as practice and scholarship where archaeology meets the world. In Key Concepts in Public Archaeology, Gabriel Moshenska, ed. UCL Press, London, 1–13.
Sara Perry. 2015. Crafting knowledge with (digital) visual media in archaeology. In Material Evidence. Learning from archaeological practice., Robert Chapman and Alison Wylie, eds. Routledge, London, 189–210.
V Petrovic, A Gidding, T Wypych, F Kuester, T DeFanti, and T Levy. 2011. Dealing with Archaeology’s Data Avalanche. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 44, 7 (2011), 56–60. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2011.161
Lorna Richardson. 2013. A Digital Public Archaeology? Pap. from Inst. Archaeol. 23, 1 (2013), 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/pia.431
Lorna-Jane Richardson and Simon Lindgren. 2017. Online Tribes and Digital Authority: What Can Social Theory Bring to Digital Archaeology? Open Archaeol. 3, 1 (2017), 139–148. DOI: 10.1515/opar2017-0008
Christopher H. Roosevelt, Peter Cobb, Emanuel Moss, Brandon R. Olson, and Sinan Ünlüsoy. 2015. Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice. J. F. Archaeol. 40, 3 (2015), 2042458215Y.000. DOI: 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
Jessica M. Smith and Tom Van Ierland. 2018. Framing Controversy on Social Media: #NoDAPL and the Debate about the Dakota Access Pipeline on Twitter. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 61, 3 (2018), 226–241. DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2018.2833753
Dominic Walker. 2014. Antisocial media in archaeology? Archaeol. Dialogues 21, 02 (2014), 217–235. DOI: 10.1017/S1380203814000221