Main Article Content
This paper discusses the progress and potential of spectral geographical research. It evaluates the usefulness of figurative spectrality in work on performance, (non-)representation, visual imagery, urban landscapes, remembrance and commemoration. Acknowledging the use of hauntological devices to speak to absence, liminality, excess, uncertainty and iteration, the paper identifies limitations of spectral metaphors, highlighting their tendency to marginalize historical and cultural specificity and embodied human experience. Subverting academic convention by taking seriously reports of possible ghost sightings at a property in the south of England, the paper further explores the space between the metaphorical and the material. It invites suspension of disbelief in order to consider implications of materially haunted spaces i.e. those indwelled or constituted by entities of a spiritual, otherworldly or otherwise anomalous kind. Speaking to debates within the complementary fields of geography and folklore, it proposes an agenda for new cross-disciplinary paranormal geographical research that would move beyond metaphorical constructions of haunting to cultivate radical openness to the ontological possibilities and intellectual challenges of materially haunted space.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Derivative License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
4. While NDiF adopts the above strategies in line with best practices common to the open access journal community, it urges authors to promote use of this journal (in lieu of subsequent duplicate publication of unaltered papers) and to acknowledge the unpaid investments made during the publication process by peer-reviewers, editors, copy editors, programmers, layout editors and others involved in supporting the work of the journal.