A Feminist and Queer Theory Take on the Legitimization of Hatshepsut as King

Main Article Content

Derian Dalton

Abstract

This paper considers a Western white male bias of ancient Egyptian custom and culture, and more specifically King Hatshepsut, Pharaoh and Co-regent of Eighteenth Dynasty ancient Egypt. Western anthropologists have routinely and incorrectly labeled Hatshepsut as queer because of her masculinized political character. These accusations are rooted in a traditional Western belief in a male-female gender binary system, and these beliefs have been applied to a culture that does not recognize the same understanding of gender, sex, and sexuality. Further, I discuss the myriad ways in which Hatshepsut legitimized her rule, including her political manipulation of masculinity, her proclamation of ancestral and divine lineage, the artistic commissions of herself and of Thutmose III - her co-regent, stepson, and nephew, and her strength as a military leader. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dalton, D. (2024). A Feminist and Queer Theory Take on the Legitimization of Hatshepsut as King. Journal of Student Research at Indiana University East, 5(2). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jsriue/article/view/36200
Section
Social Sciences

References

Callender, Gae. 1988. A Critical Examination of the Reign of Hatshepsut. Ancient Society (Australia), 18(2), 86. https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/critical-examination-reign-hatshepsut/docview/1293395761/se-2.

Carney, Elizabeth. D. 2001. Women and Military Leadership in Pharaonic Egypt. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 42(1), 25-41. https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/women-military-leadership-pharaonic-egypt/docview/229176651/se-2.

Creasman, Pierce Paul. 2014. Hatshepsut and the Politics of Punt. The African Archaeological Review, 31(3), 395-405. https://www-jstor-org.proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/stable/43916715?searchText=Hatshepsut+and+the+Politics+of+Punt&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DHatshepsut%2Band%2Bthe%2BPolitics%2Bof%2BPunt&ab_segments=0%2FSYC-6744_basic_search%2Fcontrol&refreqid=fastly-default%3A6ce1be340459eb2b5be29826b424b5cf.

Davies, Vanessa. 2004. Hatshepsut’s Use of Tuthmosis III in Her Program of Legitimation. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, 41, 55–66.

https://doi.org/10.2307/20297187.

Diamond, Kelly-Anne. 2020. Hatshepsut: Transcending Gender in Ancient Egypt. Gender & History, 32: 168-188. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1468-0424.12462.

Manuelian, Peter Der, and Loeben, Cristian. E. A.1993. From Daughter to Father the Recarved Egyptian Sarcophagus of Queen Hatshepsut and King Thutmose I. Journal of the Museum of Fine Arts, 5, 24–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20519753.

Manuelian, Peter Der, and Loeben, Christian. E. B.1993. New Light on the Recarved Sarcophagus of Hatshepsut and Thutmose I in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 79, 121–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3822161.

Matic, Uros. 2016. (De)queering Hatshepsut: Binary Bind in Archaeology of Egypt and Kingship Beyond the Corporeal. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(3), 810-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9288-9.

Robins, Gay. 1999. The Names of Hatshepsut as King. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, vol. 85, 103-112. https://www-jstor org.proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/stable/3822429?searchText=The+Names+of+Hatshepsut+as+King&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DThe%2BNames%2Bof%2BHatshepsut%2Bas%2BKing&ab_segments=0%2FSYC-6744_basic_search%2Fcontrol&refreqid=fastly-default%3A26300ba77ab8cf35ee424c9834fa17b8.

Teeter, Emily. 2006. Museum Review: Hatshepsut and Her World. American Journal of Archaeology, 110(4), 649–653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40025062.

Uphill, E. P. 1961. A Joint Sed-Festival of Thutmose III and Queen Hatshepsut. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 20(4), 248–251. http://www.jstor.org/stable/543914.