AI, Art, and the Work of Narsiso Martinez: A Political Science Case Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
This case study presents the results of an innovative three-part class assignment conducted in an undergraduate political science seminar at Canisius University, a Buffalo-based Catholic university in the Jesuit tradition. Twenty-four students were first asked to critically assess the work of Mexican American artist Narsiso Martinez as part of the class theme of “Race, Law, and Politics.” Students studied Martinez’s canvases, which were available online and at a local gallery at the time. His focus is agricultural labor(ers) in the Western United States using mixed media. The second stage of the assignment had students use Adobe Firefly to understand how artificial intelligence (AI) processes and generates art through specific search terms including “agriculture,” “labor,” and “workers.” A comparative reflection formed the final part of the assignment. Students found the assignment captivating and thought provoking because it exposed race- and gender-based biases within AI. Students saw through Firefly’s understanding of labor-related art a stark contrast to the lived experiences of agricultural workers. I conclude with suggestions for educators who are keen on incorporating AI-focused assessments into their syllabi.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.