Exploring the Role of Generative AI as a Research Assistant in Undergraduate Sociology Research Methods
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has introduced new opportunities and challenges in higher education, particularly in meeting the needs of Generation Z students—digital natives who expect technology to be integrated into their learning experiences. This exploratory study investigates how undergraduate students perceived Microsoft Copilot, a generative AI (GenAI) tool, as a research assistant in completing a multistage research proposal in a sociology research methods course. Drawing on the expectation-confirmation model, the study examined the link between students’ preuse expectations of Copilot and their postuse evaluations across six key research tasks: developing research questions, formulating testable hypotheses, developing literature review outlines, identifying measurement tools, selecting a sampling technique, and completing the research proposal. Students completed pre- and postsurveys measuring expectations, perceived usefulness, overall satisfaction with use, and intentions for future use. Results show that students entered the course with high expectations of Copilot’s usefulness, which were largely confirmed or exceeded after use, especially for research-related tasks. Satisfaction and continuance intention outcomes aligned with this confirmation: 87% rated their experience as good or excellent, and 57% of students stated they would continue use. These findings suggest that GenAI, when integrated into scaffolded research tasks, can have a positive impact on students’ learning experiences. The study contributes to existing research on GenAI in higher education by highlighting how expectation confirmation can shape student satisfaction and inform integration strategies in technology-enhanced instruction.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.