Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
Adams, W.K., Paulson, A., & Wieman, C.E. (2008). What levels of guidance promote engaged exploration with interactive simulations? AIP Conf. Proceedings, 1064, 59-62. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3021273
Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S.B., Perkins, K.K., Dubson, M., & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A study of educational dimulations part I – Engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 397-419. http://www.editlib.org/p/24230
Christian, W. (n.d.). Physlets [Software]. Available from http://webphysics.davidson.edu/Applets/Applets.html.
Clark, D., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Learning Science: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education Commissioned Papers. Board on Science Education: Center for Education.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010). What can student-generated diagrams tell us about their understanding of chemical equations? SAARMSTE 2010: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education: Crossing the Boundaries, 51-58. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30025036
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.
Finkelstein, N.D. (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1187-1209. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069491
Finkelstein, N.D., Adams, W.K., Keller, C.J., Kohl, P.B., Perkins, K.K., Podolefsky, N.S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 1(1), 010103. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103
Finkelstein, N.D., Adams, W.K., Keller, C.J., Perkins, K.K., & Wieman, C.E. (2006). High-Tech Tools for Teaching Physics: the Physics Education Technology Project. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 109-121. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no3/finkelstein.pdf
Gizmos! Online simulations that power inquiry and understanding. (2012). Retrieved December 9, 2012 from: http://www.explorelearning.com/.
Hawkins, D. (1974). The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature. New York: Agathon Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kearney, M. (2004). Classroom use of multimedia-supported predict–observe–explain tasks in a social constructivist learning environment. Research In Science Education, 34(4), 427-453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8795-y
Keller, C.J., Finkelstein, N.D., Perkins, K.K., & Pollock, S.J. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of a computer simulation in conjunction with tutorials in introductory Physics in undergraduate Physics recitations. AIP Conf. Proceedings, 818, 109-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2177035
Kohl, P.B., & Finkelstein, N.D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Ed. Res., 4, 010111. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McKagan, S.B., Perkins, K.K., Dubson, M., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., Malley, C., & Wieman, C.E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys., 76(4), 406-417. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1119/1.2885199
Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H., & Novak, J.D. (2005). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. Elsevier Inc.
Moore, E.B., Herzog, T., & Perkins, K.K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3RP20157K
National Research Council. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. Committee on Science Learning: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education, Margaret A. Honey and Margaret L. Hilton, Eds. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Otero, V. (2003). Cognitive processes and the learning of physics part II: Mediated action. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, 156, 447-472. http://www.compadre.org/per/items/detail.cfm?ID=9840
Perkins, K.K., Moore, E.B., Podolefsky, N.S., Lancaster, K., & Denison, C. (2011). Towards research-based strategies for using PhET simulations in middle school physical science classes. AIP Conf. Proceedings, 1413, 295-298. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3680053
PhET: Free online physics, chemistry, biology, earth science and math simulations. (2012a). Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://phet.colorado.edu/
PhET Quantum Tunneling Simulation. (2012b). Retrieved on Dec. 1, 2012 from http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/quantum-tunneling
PhET Build a Molecule Simulation. (2012c). Retrieved on Nov. 11, 2012 from http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/build-a-molecule
Podolefsky, N.S., Perkins, K.K., & Adams, W.K. (2010). Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 6(2), 020117. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020117
Podolefsky, N.S., Rehn, D.A., & Perkins, K.K. (2013). Affordances of play for student agency and student-centered pedagogy. AIP Conf. Proceedings, 1513, 306. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4789713
Redish, E.F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rieber, L.P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 43-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02300540
Roth, W., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sanger, M.J. (2005). Evaluating students' conceptual understanding of balanced equations and stoichiometric ratios using a particulate drawing. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 131-134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1021/ed082p131
Shaffer, P.S., & McDermott, L.C. (1991). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies. Am. J. Phys., 60(11), 1003-1013. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.16979
Singer, S.R., Hilton, M.L., & Schweingruber, H.A. (2005). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school ccience. The National Academies Press.
Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C.E., Knight, J.K., Guild, N., & Su, T.T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1165919
StarLogo TNG [Software]. (2008). MIT Scheller Teacher Education Program. Available from http://education.mit.edu/projects/starlogo-tng.
TEAL – Technology Enabled Active Learning [Software]. (1999). MIT iCampus. Available from http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/teal/.
Vygotsky, L.S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo [Software]. Available from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.