Does contiguous effect matter in PowerPoint presentations for effective instruction?
Main Article Content
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Alkazemi, E. (2003). The effect of the instructional sequence of a computer simulation and a traditional laboratory on middle grade students’ conceptual understanding of an electrochemistry topic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.
Bitter, G., & Legacy, J. (2008). Using technology in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Demirbilek, M. (2004). Effects of interface windowing modes and individual differences on disorientation and cognitive load in a hypermedia learning environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.
Ellis, T.J. (2001). Multimedia enhanced educational products as a tool to promote critical thinking in adult students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 107-123.
Grace-Martin, M. (2001). How to design educational multimedia: A "loaded" question. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10(4), 397-409.
Hack, G. (2004). Effects of a narrative instructional strategy on knowledge acquisition and retention from a nutrition education video. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.
Johnson, C., & Mayer, R.E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191.
Lin, H. Y. (2006). From audio to audiovisual: A discussion of museum planning for mobile multimedia guides. Museology Quarterly, 20(1), 97-114.
Martin-Michiellot, S., & Mendelsohn, P. (2000). Cognitive load while learning with a graphical computer interface. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 284-293.
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning & Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Most, T., & Greenbank, A. (2000). Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perception of emotions by adolescents with and without learning disabilities, and their relationship to social skills. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 171-178.
O’Bannon, B., & Puckett, K. (2010). Preparing to use technology: A practical guide to curriculum integration. Boston: Pearson.
Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Exploring the practice and development of generic skills through web-based learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(3), 207225.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fu¨rstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 159–173.
Schuler, A., Scheiter, K., Rummer, R., & Gerjets, P. (April, 2012). Explaining the modality effect in multimedia learning: Is it due to a lack of temporal contiguity with written text and pictures? Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 92-102.
Shaw, T. (2003, November). Dodging the bullets: The danger of reductionism in the PowerPoint presentations. Multimedia Schools, 10(6), 43-47. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=11355901&db=aph.