Starting with the Space: Integrating Learning Spaces and Technologies Integrating Learning Spaces and Technologies

Main Article Content

Gina Sanchez Gibau
Francia Kissel
Modupe Labode


Teaching introductory courses to college freshmen requires innovative pedagogies, which are often powered by new advanced technologies. In addition to the potential for increased student engagement promised by new technologies, instructors may also plan and deploy active learning strategies that first consider the physical spaces in which learning will take place. Effective pedagogies acknowledge both the impact that space has on student learning and the utility of both “low” and “high” technologies to facilitate such learning, merging the inherent power of each. The following case study provides the example of a themed learning community (TLC) as a vehicle through which instructors may maximize technologies and spaces to enhance the teaching and learning process. The case study highlights both the use of physical learning spaces (e.g., cutting-edge Mosaic classrooms; traditional classrooms; the off-campus settings of museums) and learning technologies (e.g., high technology tools such as image sharing software versus low tech white boards and paper-based pop-up museum exhibits) to illustrate the ways in which instructional teams collaborate to intentionally design meaningful learning experiences for their students.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gibau, G. S., Kissel, F., & Labode, M. (2019). Starting with the Space: Integrating Learning Spaces and Technologies: Integrating Learning Spaces and Technologies. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 8(1), 17–32.
Case Study


American Alliance of Museums. (2019). About AAM. Retrieved from

Araujo, N., Carlin, D., Clarke, B., Morieson, L., Lukas, K., & Wilson, R. (2014). Belonging in the first year: A creative discipline cohort case study. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 21-31.

Bandy, J. (2018). Created opportunities for students to apply course content outside of the classroom. Retrieved from

Beichner, R. J., Saul, J., Abbott, D., Morse, J., Deardorff, D., Allain, R., Bonham, S. W., Dancy, M. H., & Risley, J. (2007). Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project. In E. Redish & P. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based reform of university physics (pp. 1–42). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.

Bennett, S. (2007). First questions for designing higher education learning spaces. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 14-26.

Bernard, E. (2015). A shared mobility: Community curatorial process and the Philadelphia Public History Truck. Exhibitionist: Journal of National Association for Museum Exhibition, 2015(Spring), 64-68. Retrieved from

Birdwell, T. (2018, August 8). Encouraging group discussion with Verb boards [Blog post]. Retrieved from[university branded ALC]iu/2018/08/08/encouraginggroup-discussion-with-verb-boards/

Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719-726. https://doi:10.1111/j.14678535.2010.01098.x

Burns, A. A. (2013). From storefront to monument: Tracing the public history of the Black Museum Movement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

Ewell, P., & Wellman, J. (2007). Enhancing student success in education: Summary report of the NPEC initiative and national symposium on postsecondary student success. Retrieved from

Eyler, J. (2009). The power of experiential. Liberal Education, 95(4), 24-31. Retrieved from

Falck, E. J. (2014). Technology and the memetic self. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Global issues and ethical considerations in human enhancement technologies (pp. 225-240). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6010-6.ch013

Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4). Retrieved from

Field, K. (2018, June 8). A third of your freshmen disappear. How can you keep them? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from

Garner, B. (2018). A look at heutagogy: New opportunities for self-directed learning. The Toolbox, 17(2), 1-4. Retrieved from

Gierdowski, D. C. (2017). The flexible writing classroom as a site for pedagogical reflection. In M. Kim and R. Carpenter (Ed.), Writing studio pedagogy: Space, place, and rhetoric in collaborative environments (pp. 155-174). Ranham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Graetz, K. A. (2006). The psychology of learning environments. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces [EDUCAUSE e-book]. Retrieved from

Grant, N. (2015). Pop up museums: Participant-created ephemeral exhibitions. Exhibitionist: Journal of National Association for Museum Exhibition, 2015(Spring), 14-18. Retrieved from

Harvey, E. J., & Kenyon, M. C. (2013). Classroom seating configurations for 21st century students and faculty. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(1). Retrieved from

Herzog, S. (2007). The ecology of learning: The impact of classroom features and utilization on student academic success. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(135), 81-106.

James, P., & Hudspeth, C. (2017). How do you take learning beyond the classroom in an interdisciplinary first-year seminar? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(151), 79-95.

Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Kuh, G. D. (2016). Student success in college: Creating the conditions that matter [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from

Lardner, L., & Malnarich, G. (2008). A new era in learning-community work: Why the pedagogy of intentional integration matters. Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 40(4), 30-37.

Latham, K. F. (2017). The laboratory of museum studies: Museality in the making. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 58(4), 219-235. doi:10.12783/issn.23282967/58/4/3

Lubar, S. (2017). Inside the lost museum: Curating, past and present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

MacIsaac, D. (n.d.). Whiteboarding in the classroom. Retrieved from

Mills, S. A., & Mehaffy, G. L. (2016). Challenging the first year of college: Old models and new imperatives. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2016(145), 57-65.

Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. Retrieved from

Morieson, L., Murray, G., Wilson, R., Clarke, B., & Lukas, K. (2018). Belonging in space: Informal learning spaces and the student experience. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7(2), 12-22. Retrieved from

Morrone, A. S., Flaming, A., Birdwell, T., Russell, J., Roman, T., & Jesse, M. (2017). Creating active learning classrooms is not enough: Lessons from two case studies. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from

Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Space as a change agent. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces [EDUCAUSE e-book]. Retrieved from

Perrin, J. (2014). Features of engaging and empowering experiential learning programs for college students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 1-12. Retrieved from

Phillipson, A., Riel, A., & Leger, A. B. (2018). Between knowing and learning: New instructors' experiences in active learning classrooms. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1-20.

Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26-33. Retrieved from

Stebleton, M., Jensen, M., & Peter, G. (2010). Enhancing student engagement in a multidisciplinary, first-year experience course. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 6(1), 1-6.

Valenti, M. (2015). Beyond active learning: Transformation of the learning space. EDUCAUSE Review, 50(40), 31-38. Retrieved from

Zepke, N. (2013). Student engagement: A complex business supporting the first year experience in tertiary education [keynote presentation]. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 4(2), 1-14.

Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.