The Language Commons: An Innovative Space Supporting Second Language Acquisition

Main Article Content

Judith Giering
Hope Fitzgerald

Abstract

In 2015, language faculty and administrators at a large public university met to evaluate the needs of the more than 20 language programs offered on campus. A priority emerged for language learning space better equipped to facilitate authentic interaction and communication. The committee conceived of an alternative language learning space that would be motivating, collaborative, and inviting, and offer a variety of technologies in support of innovative teaching and learning.  Now in its second year of operation, the Language Commons facilitates formal and informal learning activities for students and faculty that are aligned with current theory and practice of Second Language Acquisition. Language faculty utilize the space for innovative instructional activities that might otherwise be limited by small, inflexible classroom spaces. This article describes the development of the Language Commons from initial conception through design, and the rich array of activities occurring in the space, featuring examples of faculty uses of Commons spaces and technologies. Preliminary outcomes suggest the Commons is valued for its support of student motivation, lowering of anxiety, opportunities for community engagement, and as a place to disrupt classroom hierarchies and routines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Giering, J., & Fitzgerald, H. (2019). The Language Commons: An Innovative Space Supporting Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 8(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v8i1.26741
Section
Case Study

References

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actflproficiency-guidelines-2012

Erham, M., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313–330.

Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J.. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.

Kronenberg, F. (2017). Conclusion—From language centers to language learning spaces. In F. Kronenberg (Ed.), From language lab to language center and beyond: The past, present, and future of language center design (pp. 161–165). Auburn, AL: International Association for Language Learning Technology.

Modern Language Association. (2011). Learning another language: Goals and challenges [Executive Council statement]. Retrieved from https://www.mla.org/AboutUs/Governance/Executive-Council/Executive-Council-Actions/2011/Learning-AnotherLanguage-Goals-and-Challenges

O’Maggio-Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

SANS Inc. (2019). Why a language lab technology platform today? [Web Page]. Retrieved May 23, 2019, from https://www.sansinc.com/

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London, England: Arnold.

Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? Modern Language Journal, 75, 426–448.