Student Engagement Across Cultures - Investigating Lecture Software

Main Article Content

Alison J Green
Gail Sammons
Alice Swift


Most instructors are looking for ways to improve student engagement in higher education classrooms across the globe.  With the influx of tablets and laptops as the tool for students in the 21st century, the question arises of how best to integrate technology into the design of a lecture and is there a difference when designing a lecture with technology across cultures?  The purpose of this study was to investigate lecture software in the classroom. Students and instructors from Singapore and the U.S. participated.  The instrument, to collect the perceptions of the lecture software was the Student Engagement Survey, and the results reveal that active learning was a common educational thread across the globe by using the lecture software technology.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Green, A. J., Sammons, G., & Swift, A. (2017). Student Engagement Across Cultures - Investigating Lecture Software. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 6(1), 15–30.


Barron, P. E., & Acodia, C. (2002). Linking learning style preferences and ethnicity: International students studying hospitality and tourism management in Australia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism Education, 1(3), 1-13.

Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernandez-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. (2013). Using clickers in class: The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers and Education, 62, 102-110.

Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Blumberg, P. (2008). Practical tools to help faculty use learner-centered teaching approaches. In L. B. Nilson, & J. E. Miller. To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, Vol. 27 (pp. 111-134). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bojinova, E., & Oigara, J. (2011). Teaching and learning with clickers: Are clickers good for students? Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 169-184.

Boles, S. R. (2011). Using technology in the classroom. Science Scope, 34(9), 39-43.

Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. (1991 AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington DC: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, E. A., Thomas, N. J., & Thomas, L. Y. (2014). Students׳ willingness to use response and engagement technology in the classroom. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 80-85.

Charlesworth, Z. M. (2008). Learning styles across cultures: Suggestions for educators. Education+Training, 50(2), 115-127.

Coates, H. (2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1-17.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman, Society and Language Classroom (pp. 169-206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.

DeBourgh, G. (2008). Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 76-87.

Diemer, T. T., Fernandez, E., & Streepey, J. W. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom engagement and learning using iPads. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(2), 13-25.

Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching for second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23 (86-290).

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72.

Frederick, Z. (2011). Project management 101: Plan well, communicate a lot, and don't forget acceptance criteria! OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 27(3), 170-174.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.

Green, A., Chang, W., Tanford, S., & Moll, L. (2013). Student perceptions towards using clickers and lecture software applications in large lecture courses. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(1), 1-19.

Green, A., & Sammons, G. (2014). Student learning styles: assessing active learning in the hospitality learner’s model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26(1), 29-38.

Gunawardena, C. N., Wilson, P. L., & Nolla, A. C. (2003). Culture and online education. In M. Moore, B. Anderson, M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Learning (pp. 753-775). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Huang, R. (2005). Chinese international students' perceptions of the problem-based learning experience. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism, 4(2), 36-43.

Knowles, M. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy. Adult Leadership, 16(10), 350-352, 386.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kong, H., & Yan, Q. (2014). The relationship between learning satisfaction and career competencies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 133-139.

Kulatunga, U., & Rameezdeen, R. (2014). Use of clickers to improve student engagement in learning: Observations from the built environment discipline. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(1), 3-18.

Liu, N. F., & Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371-384.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Series in Educational Innovation.

Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (89), 3-14.

Miller, J. P., Milholland, E. S., & Gould, S. M. (2012). Determining the attitudes of students toward the use of a classroom response in hospitality courses. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 24(2-3), 73-79.

Morris, R. C., & Parker, L. C. (2014). Examining the connection between classroom technology and student engagement. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3(1), 1-15.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Oigara, J., & Keengwe, J. (2013). Students' perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 15-28.

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.

Pew Research Center. (2014, January). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved January 15, 2016

Samson, P. J. (2010). Deliberate engagement of laptops in large lecture classes to improve attentiveness and engagement. Computers in Education, 20(2), 1-19.

Schoffstall, D. G., Arendt, S. W., & Brown, E. A. (2013). Academic engagement of hospitality students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 141-153.

Sternberger, C. (2012). Interactive learning environment: Engaging students using clickers. Teaching With Technology, 33(2), 121-124.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 1-70.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wood, W. B. (2004). Clickers: A teaching gimmick that works. Developmental Cell, 7(6), 796798.

Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2014). Student engagement: Students' and teachers' perception. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 386-398.