“They Look at Themselves and Say: “Well, Okay…””: The Contribution of Video to Professional Identity Development

Main Article Content

Anne-Mette Nortvig


This paper focuses on the development of professional identity by the use of video technology. On the basis of empirical material from a professional bachelor’s e-learning programme, it is argued that the use of video can contribute to reflection of professional identity through its opportunities for visual reification of the professional “Me”: while acting in profession-like settings, the students experience their professional actions from an inside “I”-perspective, but while watching themselves on the video recording of it later on, they can see, reflect and evaluate their professional “Me” from an outside perspective in the role of the professional other. 


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nortvig, A.-M. (2017). “They Look at Themselves and Say: “Well, Okay…””: The Contribution of Video to Professional Identity Development. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v6.n1.19770


Antonietti, A., Confalonieri, E., & Marchetti, A. (2014). Reflective thinking in educational settings: A cultural framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bayat, M. (2010). Use of dialogue journals and video-recording in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31(2), 159-172.

Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. London: University of California Pr.

Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2013). In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (Paperback Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Charmaz, K. (1994). Identity dilemmas of chronically ill men. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(2), 269288.

Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Grounded theory in the 21st century. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Developing grounded theory. the second generation (pp. 125-140). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

Clarke, A. E., & Friese, C. (2013). Grounded theorizing using situational analysis. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. (Paperback Edition ed., pp. 363-397). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cooley, C. H. (1922 [1902]). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner.

Crossley, N., & Crossley. (1995). Body techniques, agency and intercorporeality: On goffman's relations in public. Sociology, 29(1), 133-149.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, F. (1968). Professional socialization as subjective experience: The process of doctrinal conversion among student nurses. Institutions and the person (pp. 235-251). Chicago: Aldine.

Davis, J. L. (2014). Triangulating the self: Identity processes in a connected era. Symbolic Interaction, 37(4), 500-523.

Dewey, J. (1930). Human nature and conduct : An introduction to social psychology. New York: The Modern Library.

Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.

Elkjær, B., & Wiberg, M. (2013). Pragmatismens læringssyn og pragmatisk læringsteori. In A. Qvortrup, & M. Wiberg (Eds.), Læringsteori og didaktik (pp. 124-143). København: Hans Reitzel.

Faircloth, C., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., & Young, M. E. (2004). Disrupted bodies: Experiencing the newly limited body in stroke. Symbolic Interaction, 27(1), 71-87.

Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers’ development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 895-909.

Friesen, N. (2009). Re-thinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods, and practices. New York: Peter Lang.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1964). Awareness contexts and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 29(5), 669-679.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Co.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman, E. (2010). Relations in public : Microstudies of the public order. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Haas, J., & Shaffir, W. (1982). Taking on the role of doctor: A dramaturgical analysis of professionalization. Symbolic Interaction, 5(2), 187-203.

Heggen, K. (2010). Profesjon og identitet. In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 321-332). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Hewitt, J. P. (2003). Symbols, objects, and meanings. In L. T. Reynolds, & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 307-326). Lanham: AltaMira Press.

James, W. ([1890] 1918). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

Johnson, J. M. (2013). The contributions of the California sociologies to the diversity and development of symbolic interaction. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), 40th anniversary of studies in symbolic interaction (pp. 307-316). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kannen, V. (2012). ‘My body speaks to them’: Instructor reflections on the complexities of power and social embodiments. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 637-648.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interview: Introduktion til et håndværk. København: Hans Reitzel.

Laurillard, D. (2006). E-learning in higher education. In Ashwin (Ed.), Changing higher education (pp. 71-84). London: Routledge.

Loseke, D. R., & Cahill, S. E. (1986). Actors in search of a character: Student social workers' quest for professional identity. Symbolic Interaction, 9(2), 245-258.

Lund, H., Bjørnlund, I. B., & Sjöberg, N. E. (2010). Basisbog i fysioterapi. København: Munksgaard.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. London: University of Chicago press.

Meltzer, B. N. (2003). Mind. In L. T. Reynolds, & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 253-266). Lanham: AltaMira Press.

Milliken, P. J., & Schreiber, R. (2012). Examining the nexus between grounded theory and symbolic interactionism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 684-696.

Nicholls, D. A., & Gibson, B. E. (2010). The body and physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26(8), 497-509.

Nielsen, T. K. (2014). Teori og praksis i professionsbacheloruddannelserne: Et systematisk review. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.

Prus, R. (1996). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research : Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. New York: State University of New York Press.

Reid, A., Dahlgren, L. O., Petocz, P., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2008). Identity and engagement for professional formation. Studies in Higher Education, 33(6), 729-742.

Riemer, J. W. (1977). Becoming a journeyman electrician: Some implicit indicators in the apprenticeship process. Work and Occupations, 4(1)

Roskell, C. (2013). An exploration of the professional identity embedded within UK cardiorespiratory physiotherapy curricula. Physiotherapy, 99(2), 132-138.

Rylander, A. (2012). Pragmatism and design research. ( No. 2). Stockholm: Designfakultetens serie kunskapssammanställningar.

Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Paperback ed.). Aldershot Hants: Avebury.

Shaffir, W., & Pawluch, D. (2003). Occupations and professions. In L. T. Reynolds, & N. J. HermanKinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 893-913). Lanham: AltaMira Press.

Shibutani, T. (1991). On the empirical investigation of self-concepts. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organizations and social process. essays in honor of anselm strauss (pp. 59-69). New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.

Stone, G. P. (2009). Appearance and the self: A slightly revised version. In D. Brissetts, & C. Edgely (Eds.), Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook (3rd ed., pp. 141-162). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Strauss, A. L. (1997). Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction publishers.

Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers' understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455-465.

Trede, F., & Smith, M. (2012). Teaching reflective practice in practice settings: Students' perceptions of their clinical educators. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 615-627.

Vryan, K. D., Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2003). Identity. In L. T. Reynolds, & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 367-390). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Waskul, D. D. (2002). The naked self: Being a body in televideo cybersex. Symbolic Interaction, 25(2), 199-227.

Weigert, A. J., & Gecas, V. (2003). Self. In L. T. Reynolds, & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 267-288). Lanham: AltaMira.

Zhao, S. (2015). Reconceptualizing the self phenomenon: Toward an emic conception of the self. Symbolic Interaction, 38(2), 235-260.