Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Graduate Teaching Assistants Teaching Self-Efficacy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The graduate experience is a critical time for development of academic faculty, but often there is little preparation for teaching during the graduate career. Teaching self-efficacy, an instructor’s belief in his or her ability to teach students in a specific context, can help to predict teaching behavior and student achievement, and can be used as a measure of graduate students’ development as instructors. An instrument measuring teaching self-efficacy of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) was developed from a general university faculty teaching instrument to the specific teaching context of STEM GTAs. Construct and face validity, measurement reliability, and factor structure of the instrument were determined from survey data of 253 STEM GTAs at six universities. STEM GTA teaching self-efficacy correlated to various measures of GTA professional development and teaching experience. Implications and applications for faculty involved in GTA professional development, supervision, and research are discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Abraham, M.R., Cracolice, M.S., Graves, A.P., Aldhamash, A.H., Kihega, J.G., Gil, J.G.P., et al. (1997). The nature and state of general chemistry laboratory courses offered by colleges and universities in the United States. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 591-594. doi: 10.1021/ed074p591
Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
Austin, A.E. (2002). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 119 - 144. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2002.0031
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pagares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publications, Inc.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (Eds.). (1996). Learning to teach. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Burton, J.P., Bamberry, N.J., & Harris-Boundy, J. (2005). Developing personal teaching efficacy in new teachers in university settings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 160-173. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268563
Byrne, B.M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS / Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
Chang, T.S., Lin, H.H., & Song, M.M. (2011). University faculty members’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1). doi: 10.1080/14703297.2010.543770
Chou, C.P., & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second ed.): Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Commander, N.E., Hart, L., & Singer, M. (2000). Preparing tomorrow's faculty: An assessment model to determine institutional needs. The Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 7(2), 93 - 111.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n17.pdf.
Davis, S.F., & Kring, J.P. (2001). A model for training and evaluating graduate teaching assistants. College Student Journal, 35(1), 45 - 51.
DeChenne, S.E. (2012, April). Towards Development of a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teaching Effectiveness. Roundtable presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC.
DeChenne, S.E., Anderson, S., Lesseig, K., Li, S., Staus, N., & Barthel, C. (2009). Graduate student teaching training: Differences in graduate students’ training needs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego. CA.
DeChenne, S.E., Anderson, S.M., Lesseig, K.R., Li, S.L., Staus, N.L., & Barthel, C. (2012). Towards a Measure of Graduate Student Teaching Professional Development. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(1), 4-19.
Dellinger, A.B., Bobbett, J.J., Olivier, D.F., & Ellett, C.D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ selfefficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 751-766. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010
Fagen, A.P., & Wells, K.M. . (2004). The 2000 national doctoral program survey. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fencle, H., & Scheel, K. (2005). Engaging students: An examination of the effects of teaching strategies on self-efficacy and course climate in a non-majors physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching. 35(1), 20-24.
Gist, M., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on selfefficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884 - 891. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.74.6.884
Golde, C.M., & Dore, T.M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Retrieved from http://phdsurvey.org/report%20final.pdf
Golde, C.M., & Dore, T.M. (Eds.). (2004). The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: The importance of disciplinary contexts. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-161. doi: 10.1007/BF02289162
Hadre, P. L. (2003). The effects of instructional training on university teaching assistants. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(4), 23 - 39.
Haney, J.J., Czerniak, C.M., & Lumpe, A.T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(3), 287 - 313. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
Henson, R.K. (2001). Teacher Self-Efficacy: Substantive Implications and Measurement. Paper presented at the Educational Research Exchange, College Station, Texas.
Henson, R.K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137 - 150. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3703_1
Hoy, A.W. (2003-2004). Self-Efficacy in College Teaching. Essays on teaching excellence: Toward the best in the academy, 15(8). Retrieved from http://www.podnetwork.org/publications/teachingexcellence/03-04/V15,%20N8%20WoolfolkHoy.pdf
Johnson, E. (1998). Graduate teaching assistants' beliefs about teaching mathematics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Jones, J.L. (1993). TA training: From the TA's point of view. Innovative Higher Education, 18(2), 147 - 161. doi: 10.1007/BF01191892
Kim, E. (2009). Beyond language barriers: Teaching self-efficacy among East Asian international teaching assistants. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 171-180.
Komarraju, M. (2008). A social-cognitive approach to training teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 327-334. doi: 10.1080/00986280802374344
Liaw, E.C. (2004). "How are they different?" A comparative study of native and nonnative foreign language teaching assistants regarding selected characteristics: Teacher efficacy, approach to language teaching/learning, teaching strategies and perception of nativeship. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Retrieved from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi?osu1092324144
Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285 - 298. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680539
Luft, J.A., Kurdziel, J.P., Roehrig, G.H., & Turner, J. (2004). Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 211 - 233. doi: 10.1002/tea.20004
Luo, J., Grady, M.L., & Bellows, L. H. (2001). Instructional issues for teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 25(3), 209 - 230.
Meyers, S.A., Lansu, M.L., Hundal, J.S., Lekkos, S.K., & Prieto, L.R. (2007). Preparing new psychology instructors to teach undergraduates: Developing confidence and competence. Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 45 - 54.
Miller, S., Pfund, C., Pribbenow, C.M., & Handelsman, J. (2008). Scientific teaching in practice. Science, 322, 1329- 1330. doi: 10.1126/science.1166032
Mills, N., & Allen, H.W. (2007). Teacher self-efficacy of graduate teaching assistants of French. In J. Siskin (Ed.), From thought to action: Explaining beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language program (pp. 213-234). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Moore, T., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2004). Developing model-eliciting activities for undergraduate students based on advanced engineering content. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontier in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
Morris, D. B., & Usher, E. L. (2011). Developing teaching self-efficacy in research institutions: A study of award-winning professors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 232-245. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.005
O’Neal, C., Wright, M., Cook, C., Perorazio, T., & Purkiss, J. (2007). The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for TA training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37, 24 – 29.
Pajares, F. (1996a). Assessing self-efficacy beliefs and academic outcomes: The case for specificity and correspondence. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Pajares, F. (1996b). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. doi: 10.2307/1170653
Pajares, F., Hartley, J., & Valiante, G. (2001). Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 214-221.
Park, C. (2004). The graduate teaching assistant (GTA): Lessons from North American experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 349 - 361.
Piccinin, S., & Fairweather, D. (1996-97). A local analysis of TA training needs: Implications for the planning and development of TA training programs. The Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 4(1), 23 - 34.
Pomalaza-Raez, C.A., & Groff, B.H. (2003). Retention 101: Where robots go...students follow. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 85 - 90.
Prieto, L.R., & Altmaier, E.M. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 35(4), 481 - 497. doi: 10.1007/BF02496384
Prieto, L.R., & Meyers, S.A. (1999). Effects of training and supervision on the self-efficacy of psychology graduate teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 264 - 266. doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP260404
Prieto, L.R., & Scheel, K. (2008). Teaching assistant training in counseling psychology. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 21(1), 49 - 59.
Prieto, L.R., Yamokoski, C.A., & Meyers, S. A. (2007). Teaching assistant training and supervision: An examination of optimal delivery modes and skill emphasis. Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 33 - 43.
Prieto Navarro, L. (2005). Las creencias de autoeficacia docente del profesorado universitario. Madrid: Universidad Pontifica Comillas.
Rushin, J.W., De Saix, J., Lumsden, A., Streubel, D.P., Summers, G., & Berson, C. (1997). Graduate teaching assistant training: A basis for improvement of college biology teaching and faculty development? American Biology Teacher, 59(2), 86 - 90.
Sargent, L.D., Allen, B.C., Frahm, J.A., & Morris, G. (2009). Enhancing the experience of student teams in large classes: Training teaching assistants to be coaches. Journal of Management Education, 33(5), 526-552. doi: 10.1177/1052562909334092
Shannon, D.M., Twale, D.J., & Moore, M. . (1998). TA teaching effectiveness: The impact of training and teaching experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(4), 440-446. doi: 10.2307/2649274
Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
Sundberg, M.D., Armstrong, J.E., & Wischusen, E.W. (2005). A reappraisal of the status of introductory biology laboratory education in U.S. College and Universities. The American Biology Teacher, 67(9), 525-529. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2005)067[0525:AROTSO]2.0.CO;2
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2006). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 1-6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.05-12-0132
Taylor, R.L., Heer, D., & Fiez, T.S. (2003). Using an Integrated Platform for Learning (TM) to reinvent engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(4), 409 - 418.
Tollerud, T. (1990). The perceived self-efficacy of teaching skills of advanced doctoral students and graduates from counselor education programs. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Torvi, D.A. (1994). Engineering graduate teaching assistant instructional programs: Training tomorrow's faculty members. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 375 - 381.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A.W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783 - 805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A.W., & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202 - 248. doi: 10.2307/1170754
Weber, R.J., Gabbert, A., Kropp, J., & Pynes, P. (2007). Creating the teaching professor: Guiding graduate students to become effective teachers. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 45 – 63.
Verleger, M., & Velasquez, J. (2007, October). An engineering teaching assistant orientation program: Guidelines, reactions, and lessons learned from a one-day intensive training program. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
Young, S.L., & Bippus, A.M. (2008). Assessment of graduate teaching assistant (GTA) training: A case study of a training program and its impact on GTAs. Communication Teacher, 22(4), 116-129. doi: 10.1080/17404620802382680