The Road to Redemption: Reclaiming the Value in Assessment Retention Exams

Main Article Content

Trey Stohlman

Abstract

A good assessment plan combines many direct and indirect measures to validate the collected data. One often controversial assessment measure comes in the form of retention exams. Although assessment retention exams may come with faults, others advocate for their inclusion in program assessment. Objective-based tests may offer insight to instructors about course objectives that students comprehend well and other concepts that need more attention. This research shows that using retention exams as an assessment measure can generate useful and meaningful data for both the students and the program. Students can learn strengths and weaknesses based on scores. Faculty and programs can learn where gaps may exist within the program. But, whenever a program decides to use retention exams as an assessment tool, faculty members need to be included in the process. Discussions about content need to occur constantly. Exams need to consistently reflect current standards and student learning objectives. And faculty need to stay involved in the process to know exactly where any inconsistencies may lie within their courses, and how they contribute to the students’ overall experience within the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stohlman, T. (2015). The Road to Redemption: Reclaiming the Value in Assessment Retention Exams. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.19189
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Trey Stohlman, Central Michigan University

Assistant Professor Assessment Coordinator School of Broadcast & Cinematic Arts

References

The Association for Authentic, Experiential and Evidenced-Based Learning. (2014). Engaged learning and ePortfolios: Advancing learning-centered cultures in a multimodal age. 2014 Annual Conference. Boston.

Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Broadcast Education Association. (2014). BEA assessment bootcamp. 2014 Convention Connections: Mobile and global. Las Vegas.

The Office of Planning and Institutional Improvement. (2014). 2014 Assessment Institute in Indianapolis. Indianapolis: Indiana Univeristy-Purdue University Indianapolis.

Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tucker, D. E. (2006). Direct measures: Examinations. In W. G. Christ, Assessing media education: A resource handbook for educators and administrators (pp. 373-396). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.