Bringing Adam Smith’s pin factory to life: Field trips and discussions as forms of experiential learning

Main Article Content

Monica Galizzi

Abstract

Educators are often aware of the need to implement a variety of teaching techniques to reach out to students with different learning styles. I describe an attempt to target multimodal learners by bringing classical economic texts and concepts to life through discussions, field visits and role playing exercises.

In my Labor Economics class I analyze the relationship existing between demand for labor, technological advances, and trade. As a foundation for such analysis, I assign the reading of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations chapters regarding the division of labor. To increase students’ interest toward the topics, I precede the text discussion with a field visit to a museum of industrial revolution. Here students are asked to participate also as “factory workers” to an assembly line exercise that brings Smith’s description of a pin factory to life. They are then asked to reflect on this experience and to use it as a foundation to inform the following class discussions about Smith’s chapters.

In this paper I describe the main learning and retention objectives of this exercise, its implementation, challenges, and students’ learning outcomes and feedback about enjoyment and recollection. Field trip participants performed significantly better when tested on the relevant concepts. I also discuss the rewards and institutional challenges associated with making use of community resources to increase the understanding of the concrete applications of the economics concept we teach.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Galizzi, M. (2014). Bringing Adam Smith’s pin factory to life: Field trips and discussions as forms of experiential learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotlv14i5.12938
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Monica Galizzi, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Professor of Economics, Department of Economics.

See https://uml.edu/FAHSS/economics/faculty/Galizzi-monica.aspx

References

Bhadra, L. J. (2006). A picture is worth a thousand words: Engaging kinesthetic and multimodal learners of economics using contemporary films. Inquiry, 11 (1), 11-19.

Bhaskar, S. (2011). Implications of perceptual learning style preferences on management pedagogy. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, 2, 109-114.

Bixler, V. J., & Squires, J. R. (1998). Enhancing the field experience in financial education. Financial Practice & Education, 8 (2), 83-87.

Boatman, K., Courtney, R., & Lee, W. (2008). "See how they learn:" The impact of faculty and student learning styles on student performance in introductory economics. American Economist 52 (1): 39-48.

Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. A. (2002). Personality type and student performance in upper-level economics courses: The importance of race and gender. The Journal of Economic Education, 33 (1), 3-14. doi: 10.1080/00220480209596120

Charkins, R. J., O'Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. The Journal of Economic Education, 16 (2), 111120. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1985.10845106

Dickie, M. (2006). Do classroom experiments increase learning in introductory microeconomics? Journal of Economic Education, 37, 267-288. doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.3.267-288

Durham, Y., McKinnon T., & Schulman, C. (2007). Classroom experiments: Not just fun and games. Economic Inquiry, 45,162-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00003.x

Emerson, T. L. N., & Taylor, B. A. (2007). Interactions between personality type and the experimental methods. Journal of Economic Education, 38, 18-35. doi: 10.3200/JECE.38.1.1835

Emerson, T. L. N., &Taylor, B. A. (2004). Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal, 70, 672-93. doi: 10.2307/4135338

Fitkov-Norris, E., & Yeghiazarian, A. (2013). Assessing the learning style preferences of postgraduate general business management students using VARK. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 144-XIII. Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11,137-155.

Gallagher, A. J., & Co. (2008). Beyond the classroom. Experiential learning: Managing risks Maximizing rewards. Retrieved from: http://www.ajgrms.com/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_28406_558233_0_0_18/Beyond%20the%20Classroom%20-%20Experiential%20Learning.pdf.

Garces-Ozanne, A., & Esplin P., (2010). To work or not to work . . . that is the question: Labour market decisions in the classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 9, 84-98.

Gibson, A. (2010). Measuring business student satisfaction: A review and summary of the major predictors. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 32, 251-259. doi: 10.1080/13600801003743349

Hansen, W. L., & Salemi, M. K. (1998). Improving classroom discussion in economic courses in teaching undergraduate economics. In W. Walstad & P. Saunders (Eds.), A handbook for instructors. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Harmon, O. R, Alpert, W., & Histen, J. (2014). Online discussion and learning outcomes. International Advances in Economic Research, 20 (1), 33-44. doi: 10.1007/s11294-013-9453-9

Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.15404609.2007.00125.x

Hawtrey, K. (2007). Using experiential learning techniques. The Journal of Economic Education, 38 (2), 143-152. doi: 10.3200/JECE.38.2.143-152

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jensen, E. J., & Owen A. L. (2003). Appealing to good students in introductory economics, Journal of Economic Education, 34, 299-325. doi: 10.1080/00220480309595225

Lawson, L.L. (2007). The economics of experience-based higher education. Atlantic Economic Journal, 35 (1), 23-31. doi: 10.1007/s11293-006-9047-5

Lempert, D. H., & Briggs, X. (1996). Escape from the Ivory Tower: Student adventures in democratic experiential education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Leung, A., McGregor, M., Sabiston, D., & Vriliotis, S. (2014). VARK Learning styles and student performance in principles of micro- vs. macro-economics. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, forthcoming.

Lopus, J., & Hoff, J. (2009). Is there a disconnect between teaching styles and learning styles in high school economics classes? Journal of Private Enterprise, 24 (2), 157-164.

Madden, K. K. (2010). Engaged learning with the inquiry-based question cluster discussion technique: Student outcomes in a history of economic thought course. Southern Economic Journal, 77 (1), 224-239. doi: 10.4284/sej.2010.77.1.224

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J. & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325, 284-288. doi: 10.1126/science.1175626

Mutiu, A., & Moldovan, G. (2011). How to better meet our students’ learning styles through the course resources. Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science, 2, 578-584.

Nilson, L. B. (2003). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Pub. Co.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105-119.

Salemi, M. (2005). Asking the right kind of question promotes learning during discussion. Retrieved from: http://www.unc.edu/~salemi/Papers/Asking_Right_Kind_of_Question.pdf.

Salemi, M. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Southern Economic Journal, 68 (3). 721-731. doi: 10.2307/1061730

Smith, M. G. (Summer, 2007). Case studies on location: Taking to field in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 308-317. doi: 10.3200/JECE.38.3.308-317

Smith, R., & O’Connell, P. (Winter, 1997). Workers on the line: Teaching industrial history at the Tsongas Industrial History Center and Lowell National Historical Park. OAH Magazine of History, 22-26.

Spencer, R. W., & Van, D. F. (1986). Experiential learning in economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 17 (4), 289-294. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1986.10845175

Tsongas Industrial History Center. (2011). Activity Guide. Workers on the Line. University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education, Lowell National Historical Park. Retrieved from: http://www.uml.edu/tsongas/Curriculum_Materials/Curriculum_Packets/WOL.pdf.

Vickers, M. Z. (2010). Accommodating college students with learning disabilities: ADD, ADHD, and Dyslexia. John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved from: http://www.popecenter.org/acrobat/vickers-mar2010.pdf.

Watts, M., & Becker, W. E. (Summer, 2008). A little more than chalk and talk: Results from a third national survey of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses. Journal of Economic Education, 273-286. doi: 10.3200/JECE.39.3.273-286

Wetzel, J. N., O'Toole D., & Peterson, S. (1999). Factors affecting student retention probabilities: A case study. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23, 45-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02752686

Whinnery, K. W. (1992). College preparation for students with learning disabilities: A curriculum approach. Preventing School Failure, 37 (1), 31-34. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.1992.9944593