Student perspectives on self-directed learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Undergraduate student perspectives regarding specific factors associated with self-directed learning were collected through eight focus groups. A total of 80 upperclassmen provided input revealing three emergent themes in the focus groups responses: (1) Student-Controlled, (2) Faculty-Controlled, and (3) Administration-Controlled Facilitators and Barriers to promoting self-directed learning. Students acknowledged much of their learning was within their control. However, they did note that faculty and administrators have a significant impact on their desire and ability to learn. In an effort to empower students to direct their own learning processes the results of this study have been integrated into campus assessment initiatives including the development of a student organization to provide a consistent, student-led forum for students to voice their opinions and concerns about their learning processes and assessment.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Brown, S. (2004-05). Assessment for learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 81-89.
Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. Utrecht/London: Lemma BV/Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Flint, N.R., & Johnson, B. (2011). Towards fairer university assessment: Recognizing the concerns of students. New York: Routledge.
Glaser, R. (1990). Testing and assessment: O tempora! O mores! Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.
Guiffrida, D.A., Lynch, M.F., Wall, A.F., & Abel, D.S. (2013). Do reasons for attending college affect academic outcomes? A test of a motivational model from a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 121-139. doi: 10.1353/csd.2013.0019
Herman, G.L. (2012). Designing contributing student pedagogies to promote students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. Computer Science Education, 22, 369-388. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2012.727711
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., & Whitt, E.J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McCune, V., & Entwistle, N. (2011). Cultivating the disposition to understand in 21st Century university education, Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.017
Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education 14, 537-557. doi: 10.1007/s11191004-5157-0
Pink, D.H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Trade.
Potter, W.J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159-175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990
Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Le, H., David, D., Langley, R.,. & Carlstrom, C. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sanders, M. (2006). Building school-community partnerships: Collaboration for student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Stemler, S.E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9(4). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes, Higher Education, 22, 251–266. doi: 10.1007/BF00132290
Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D.,. & Liem, A.D. (2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 812-828. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.812
Yazedjian, A., Toews, M., Sevin, T.,. & Purswell, K. (2008). It’s a whole new world: A qualitative exploration of college students’ definitions of and strategies for college success. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 141-154. doi: 10.1353/csd.2008.0009