A novel approach for practitioners in training: A blended-learning seminar combining experts, students and practitioners

Main Article Content

Vicky J. Meretsky
Teresa A.N. Woods

Abstract

A joint student and professional practitioner seminar used distance technology to allow remote experts to present to, and remote practitioners to participate in, a university-based learning experience. Participants were professional practitioners from the US Fish and Wildlife Service who were mandated to receive training and on-campus graduate students in environmentally focused programs who were enrolled for credit. Seminars providing training in high-demand or cutting-edge topics may be especially valuable to practitioners outside the university in business, agency, or organization positions, if they can attend as distance learners. Such classes create opportunities to bring students and professionals together to interact with expert presenters, who may present from distant locations. Presenters model expert thinking for students and engage them in discussions in which they practice such thinking. Students gain additional insight into their field of practice by observing interactions between practitioners and presenters, as well as by working directly with practitioners, in discussions and, potentially, in assignments. As a result, at little cost to any participant, students are engaged in authentic learning that is not regularly available in a classroom setting and practitioners gain access to a series of experts as well as access to student views and, potentially, student work. Instructors must relinquish considerable control of some aspects of the learning environment, but as mediators can increase the value-added aspects of sharing the class with professionals. Professional programs seeking to prepare students for professional practice often combine both more traditional classroom learning and experiential learning during thesis preparation, service learning or internships. Seminars such at this provide a valuable addition to this mix.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meretsky, V. J., & Woods, T. A. (2013). A novel approach for practitioners in training: A blended-learning seminar combining experts, students and practitioners. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(3), 48–62. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/3123
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Vicky J. Meretsky, SPEA, Indiana University

Associate Professor

School of Public and Environmental Affairs

Teresa A.N. Woods, Natural Resources Science and Management University of Minnesota

Previously Special Assistant to the Director, Region Three, US Fish and Wildlife Service

Currently doctoral student in Natural Resources Science and Management, University of Minn

 

References

Bradley, F., Steven, A., & Ashcroft, D.M. (2011). The role of hidden curriculum in teaching pharmacy students about patient safety. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(7), 1-7. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757143

Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 452-494), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators, Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education, New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.

Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Jaye, C., Egan, T., & Parker, S. (2005). Learning to be a doctor: Medical educators talk about the hidden curriculum in medical education. Focus on Health Professional Education, 7(2), 1-17.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Lehman, R.M., & Conceição, S.C.O. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to “be there” for distance learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Masella, R.S. (2006). The hidden curriculum: Value added in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 70(3), 279-283. Available online at http://www.jdentaled.org/content/70/3/279.full.pdf+html

Milne, A.J. (2006). Designing blended learning space to the student experience. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 11.1-11.12), Louisville, CO: Educause. Accessed online 21 October 2012. URL: www.educause.edu/LearningSpaces.

Pace, D. & Middendorf, J. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learning disciplinary ways of thinking. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 98, 1-12.

Resnick, L.B. (1989). Introduction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 1-24), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Snyder, B.R. (1970). The hidden curriculum, New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.