Main Article Content
Abstract: Applying transformational critical advocacy research in college instruction can be a powerful way to engage students in challenging inequity in society and promoting positive changes. Few studies systematically measure the impact of such pedagogy on the development of college students’ beliefs about advocacy. In this mixed methods study, we worked with 21 preservice teachers through advocacy letter writing activities and collected data from pre/post surveys and focus group discussions to explore the impact of such pedagogy. The findings indicated that advocacy letter writing was a meaningful activity for preservice teachers, allowing them a professional opportunity to voice their concerns about personally meaningful issues to entities in power. A significant correlation was found between baseline advocacy experiences and baseline advocacy beliefs, suggesting that the teaching of advocacy, when combined with opportunities for meaningful practice, can contribute to shifts in belief about the importance of advocating.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Athanases, S., & De Oliveira, L. (2008). Advocacy for equity in classrooms and beyond: New teachers' challenges and responses. The Teachers College Record, 110(1), 64-104.
Beacham, C. V., & Shambaugh, N. (2007). Advocacy as a problem-based learning (PBL) teaching strategy. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 315-324.
Berke, D.L., Boyd-Soisson, E. F., Voorhees, A. N., & Reininga, E. W. (2010). Advocacy as Service-Learning. Family Science Review, 15(1), 13-30.
Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. L. (2010). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 308-324. doi: 10.1108/14676371011077540
Butin, D. W. (2006). The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 473-498. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2006.0025
Cawthorn, M., Leege, L., & Congdon, E. (2011). Improving learning outcomes in large environmental science classrooms through short-term service-learning projects. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1(1), 75-87. doi: 10.1007/s13412-011-0001-8
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dean, J. K. (2009). Quantifying social justice advocacy competency: Development of the social justice advocacy scale. (Unpublished PhD). Georgia State University, Atlanta. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cps_diss/40/
Eide, P. J., Hahn, L., Bayne, T., Allen, C. B., & Swain, D. (2006). The population-focused analysis project for teaching community health. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(1), 22-27.
Field, A. (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). London: SAGE
Grymes, J. M. (2007). Advocacy and teacher preparation programs. Childhood Education, 84(2), 94-D.
Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hearne, S. A. (2008). Practice-based teaching for health policy action and advocacy. Public Health Reports, 123(Suppl 2), 65.
Huerta, J. C., & Sperry, R. (2013). Pulling it together: Using integrative assignments as empirical direct measures of student learning for learning community program assessment. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 1(1), 16.
Huntington, C. G. (2001). Legislative advocacy for health professions educators. Education for Health Change in Learning & Practice, 14(2), 241-250. doi: 10.1080/13576280110059228
Mathews, R. M., & Dix, M. (1992). Behavior change in the funny papers: Feedback to cartoonists on safety belt use. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(4), 769-775. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-769
Mertens, D. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformativeemancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertens, D. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225. doi: 10.1177/1558689807302811
Mertens, D. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469474. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364612
Mertens, D. M. (2012). What comes first? The paradigm or the approach? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255-257. doi: 10.1177/1558689812461574
Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.001
Nilsson, J. E., Marszalek, J. M., Linnemeyer, R. M., Bahner, A. D., & Misialek, L. H. (2011). Development and assessment of the social issues advocacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 258-275. doi: 10.1177/0013164410391581
Radius, S. M., Galer-Unti, R. A., & Tappe, M. K. (2009). Educating for advocacy: recommendations for professional preparation and development based on a needs and capacity assessment of health education faculty. Health promotion practice, 10(1), 83-91. doi: 10.1177/1524839907306407
Scislowska, M. (2012, January 4). Polish art student hangs own painting in museum. Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved from http://www.suntimes.com/news/world/9809511-418/polish-artstudent-hangs-own-painting-in-museum.html
Shields, C. (2012). Critical qualitative research. In S. Steinberg & G. Cannella (Eds.), Critical Qualitative Research Reader (pp. 104-114). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Silverman, S. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 292-329. doi: 10.3102/0002831210365096
Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1947-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.003
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Wade, R. (2003). Teaching preservice social studies teachers to be advocates for social change. Social Studies 94(3), 129-133. doi: 10.1080/00377990309600195
White, G. W., Thomson, R. J., & Nary, D. E. (1997). An empirical analysis of the effects of a self-administered advocacy letter training program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41(2), 74-87.