Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
C.F.R. § 46 (2009). Retrieved November 5, 2013 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html
Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G. & Williams, J.M. (2008). The Craft of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226062648.001.0001
Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brew, A. (2001a). The Nature of Research: Inquiry in Academic Contexts. New York: Routledge.
Brew, A. (2001b). Conceptions of Research: a Phenomenographic Study. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (3), 271-285. doi: 10.1080/03075070120076255
Burman, M.E. & Kleinsasser, A. (2004). Ethical Guidelines for Use of Student Work: Moving from Teaching’s Invisibility to Inquiry’s Visibility in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Journal of General Education, 53 (1), 59-79. doi: 10.1353/jge.2004.0018
Cambridge, B. (1999). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Questions and Answers from the Field. AAHE Bulletin, 52 (4), 7–10.
Hammack, F.M. (1997). Ethical Issues in Teacher Research. Teachers College Record, 99 (2), 247-265.
Huber, M.T. & Hutchings, P. (2005). The Advancement of Learning: Building the Teaching Commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. London: Duckworth.
Hutchings, P. (2003). Competing Goods: Ethical Issues in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35 (5), 26-33. doi: 10.1080/00091380309604116
Kreber, C. (2001). Conceptualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Identifying Unresolved Issues: The Framework for this Volume. In C. Kreber (Ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 86. Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lopus, J.S., P.W. Grimes, W.E. Becker & R.A. Pearson. (2007). Effects of Human Subjects Requirements on Classroom Research: Multidisciplinary Evidence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2 (3), 69-78.
McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. San Francisco: Anker Publishing.
Menges, R.J., Weimer, M., and Associates. (1996). Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378. doi: 10.1037/h0040525
Pecorino, P.A., Kincaid, S. & Gironda, B. (2008). Research and Experimentation in Teaching Effectiveness: The Ethical Review Process and the IRB. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2 (1), 1-11.
Pritchard, I.A. (2002). Travelers and Trolls: Practitioner Research and Institutional Review Boards. Educational Researcher, 31 (3), 3-13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031003003
Pritchard, I.A. (2001). Searching for ‘Research Involving Human Subjects:’ What is Examined? What is Exempt? What is Exasperating? IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 23 (3), 5-13. doi: 10.2307/3564509
Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 86. Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (pp. 57-68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Savory, P., Burnett, A.N. & Goodburn, A. (2007). Inquiry into the College Classroom: A Journey Toward Scholarly Teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
Schuman, S. H., Olansky, S., Rivers, E., Smith, C.A., Rambo, D. S. (1955). Untreated Syphilis in the Male Negro; Background and Current Status of Patients in the Tuskegee Study. J Chronic Dis, 2 (5), 543–558. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(55)90153-3
Shulman, L.S. (1999). Taking Learning Seriously. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31 (4), 10-17. doi: 10.1080/00091389909602695
Stenhouse, L. (1981). What Counts as Research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29 (2), 103-114. doi: 10.1080/00071005.1981.9973589
Swenson, E.V. & McCarthy, M.A. (2012). Ethically Conducting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research. In R.E. Landrum & M.A. McCarthy (Eds.), Teaching Ethically: Challenges and Ppportunities (pp.21-29). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/13496-002
Wright, M.C., C.J. Finelli, D. Meizlish & I. Bergom. (2011). Facilitating the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at a Research University. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43 (2), 50-56. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.550255