Upcoming Preparing Tomorrow's Faculty for AI Integration: Lessons from a Graduate Teaching Course
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools—specifically ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Microsoft’s Copilot—in a graduate-level course preparing future faculty members. Through a mixed-methods approach combining pre- and post-course surveys with structured observations, the researcher investigated how these AI tools influenced students’ engagement, learning outcomes, and development of teaching competencies. The study, conducted with graduate students in a University Teaching in Human Sciences course, revealed significant improvements in students’ AI knowledge and confidence in using AI tools for educational purposes. Findings indicate that while AI tools enhanced productivity and collaborative learning, their effectiveness depended heavily on structured facilitation and intentional integration with evidence-based teaching practices. The study provides insights into both the opportunities and challenges of incorporating AI in higher education pedagogy, particularly in the context of preparing future faculty members.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://pressbooks.pub/teachinginadigitalagev3m/
Campbell, L. O., & Cox, T. D. (2024). Facilitating the research writing process with generative artificial intelligence. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 24(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v24i2.36580
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promise and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/our-work/artificial-intelligence-in-education/
Inside Higher Education. (2024). How will AI influence higher ed in 2025? https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2024/12/19/how-will-ai-influence-higher-ed-2025
Lam, A. (2024). Embracing AI in education. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/embracing-ai-in-education/
Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6).
Ramnani, S. (2024). Exploring ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in educational settings: An examination of bias, privacy, and accountability. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 9(2), 173-191.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
The Institute for Ethical AI in Education (2021). The ethical framework for AI in education. https://www.buckingham.ac.uk/research/research-in-applied-computing/the-institute-for-ethical-ai-in-education/
U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and
learning: Insights and recommendations. Office of Educational Technology. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications