To Read or not to Read (and Why) How Undergraduate Students Answer that Question
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
While most studies on undergraduate completion of reading before class have centered on the idea and goal of students’ “compliance,” a few studies have approached the problem from a different angle and instead investigated students’ own perspectives. This study contributes to the small but growing conversation on what students themselves say about their experiences of and motivations for reading (or not reading). We started from the question: Which reasons do students give for reading or not reading before class? To investigate this question, we distributed a brief survey to 287 undergraduate students three times over the course of one semester. We gathered a total of 589 usable responses, which we analyzed through a grounded process of inductive, iterative coding. We arrived at eight categories that captured the range of students’ self-reported reasons for reading (in order of frequency): to be prepared for class; to do well in the class; the reading was interesting; the reading was assigned; to understand; out of a sense of diligence; the reading was short and/or easy; and other. We arrived at seven categories that captured the range of students’ self-reported reasons for not reading (in order of frequency): it was not a priority; there was a more efficient alternative; the reading was long and/or hard; lack of organization; the reading was unnecessary; the reading was not interesting; and other. Our findings suggest that instructors can substantially increase the chances that their undergraduate students will complete (more of) the reading before class by clearly making it necessary to read to prepare for in-class activities and participation in the community that is built during class time as well as clearly tying readings to specific assignments that carry significant weight in the assessment structure for the class.
Downloads
Article Details
Jodie Lyon, University of Georgia
Department of Religion
Lindsey Harding, University of Georgia
Department of English

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Armstrong, A. (2022). Shaping effective readers: An investigation of faculty perceptions and pedagogies. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 22(3), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0039
Burrell, K. I., Tao, L., Simpson, M. L., & Mendez-Berrueta, H. (1997). How do we know what we are preparing our students for? A reality check of one university’s academic literacy demands. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 13(2), 55–70.
Del Principe, A., & Ihara, R. (2016). ‘I bought the book and I didn’t need it’: What reading looks like at an urban community college.” Teaching English in the Two Year College, 43(3), 229–44. https://library.ncte.org/journals/tetyc/issues/v43-3
Desa, G., Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., & Allen, D. D. (2020). Essential but invisible: Collegiate academic reading explored from the faculty perspective. College Teaching, 68(3), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1766406
Hoeft, M. E. (2012). Why university students don’t read: What professors can do to increase compliance. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 6(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060212
Hollander, P., Dawson, D., Haller, C., Briesacher, E., Collins, C., Rearick, K., & Lemieux, E. (2022). The importance of college reading: Professors’ and students’ views. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 90–109.
Kerr, M. M., & Frese, K. M. (2017). Reading to learn or learning to read? Engaging college students in course readings. College Teaching, 65(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1222577
Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E., & Herschbach, T. R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219–229.
Richardson, P. W. (2004). Reading and writing from textbooks in higher education: A case study from Economics. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236399
Ritchey, K. A., & List, A. (2022). Task-oriented reading: A framework for improving college students’ reading compliance and comprehension. College Teaching, 70(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.1924607
Sappington, J., Kinsey, K., & Munsayac, K. (2002). Two studies of reading compliance among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 272-274. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2904_02
Schnee, E. (2018). Reading across the curriculum at an urban community college: Student and faculty perspectives on reading. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(12), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1359702
St Clair-Thompson, H., Graham, A., & Marsham, S. (2018). Exploring the reading practices of undergraduate students. Education Inquiry, 9(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487
Theriault, J. C. (2022). College students’ conceptualizations of academic reading: What metaphors suggest about the important role of purpose in college reading and learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1238
Wambach, C. (1999). Reading and writing expectations at a research university. Journal of
Developmental Education, 22(2), 22–26.