Should I Study or Take a Break? Students’ Use and Perceptions of Study Breaks
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research on study habits among college students demonstrates that there is a difference between what students should do and what they actually do. We sought to understand students’ break-taking habits and perceptions within the context of study behaviors. One hundred and sixteen undergraduate students responded to a survey of their study break-taking behaviors, perceptions of study break-taking, personality, perceptions of rejuvenation and multitasking tendencies. Results suggest students vary in their study behaviors, including breaks and break activities, and frequency and duration of breaks based on the study task. Conscientiousness negatively predicted frequency and duration of breaks from some activities. Students recognized benefits of break-taking through qualitative and quantitative assessments. Students reported disagreement with drawbacks tied to academic performance in quantitative items but spoke to drawbacks in their process of break-taking and studying in qualitative reports. Several benefits and drawbacks of break-taking predicted students’ perceptions of rejuvenation positively and negatively, respectively.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.