Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Angell, L. R. (2006). The relationship of impulsiveness, personal efficacy, and academic motivation to college cheating. College Student Journal, 40(1), 118-131.
Barnas, M. (2000). “Parenting” students: Applying developmental psychology to the college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 276-277.
Belter, R. W., & DuPre A. (2009). A strategy to reduce plagiarism in an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 257-261
Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). An overview of the social norms approach. In L. Lederman, L. Stewart, F. Goodhart and L. Laitman (Eds). Changing the Culture of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Prevention Campaign (187-208). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
Blum, S. D. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Brown, G. (2012). Student disruption in a global college classroom: Multicultural issues as predisposing factors. Association of Black Nursing Faculty Journal, 23(3), 63-69.
Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds rations in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860-864.
Colnerud, G., & Rosander, M. (2009). Academic dishonesty, ethical norms, and learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 505-517.
Conway, M., & Groshek, J. (2009). Forgive me now, fire me later: Mass communication students’ ethics gap concerning school and journalism. Communication Education, 58(4), 461482.
Engler, J. N., Landau, J. D., & Epstein, M. (2008). Keeping up with the Joneses: Students’ perceptions of academically dishonest behavior. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 99-102.
Feldman, L. J. (2001). Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities. College Teaching, 49, 137-140.
Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M., & Moran, A. C. (2006). Faculty and colleges student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Postsecondary Education, 77(6), 1058-1080.
Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498-505.
Hudd, S. S., Apgar, C., Bronson, E. F., & Lee, R. G. (2009). Creating a campus culture of integrity: Comparing the perspectives of full- and part-time faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(2), 146-177
Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150
Kuther, T.L. (2003). A profile of the ethical professor: Student views. College Teaching, 51(4), 153-160.
Kwong, T., Ng, H.M., Mark, K.P., & Wong, E. (2010). Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong, Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(5), 341-355.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-233.
McHugh, M. L. (2009). The odds ratio: calculation, usage, and interpretation. Biochemia Medica, 19(2), 120-126.
Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
Perkins, H. W. (Ed.). (2003). The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perkins, H.W., & Berkowitz, A.D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9/10), 961-976.
Powers. L. G. (2009). University students’ perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 643-662.
Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.
Salmons, J. (2007). Online social culture: Does it foster original work or encourage plagiarism? Retrieved March 14, 2009 from http://www.vision2lead.com/Originality.pdf
Trost, K. (2009). Psst, have you ever cheated? A study of academic dishonesty in Sweden. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 367-376
Trushell J., Byrne, K., & Simpson, R. (2012). Cheating behaviours, the internet and education undergraduate students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 136-145.
Wang, Y. (2008). University student online plagiarism. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 743-757.
Williams, K. M, Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 293-307.