Flexible Deadlines Impact Student Mental Health and Course Engagement: a Mixed Methods Exploratory Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the growing number of students at colleges and universities who are considered nontraditional, creating an equitable classroom characterized by Universal Design for Learning has become increasingly important in higher education. In this mixed methods exploratory study, we assess the impact of implementing flexible deadline policies into our courses on students’ learning experience. Across four academic terms, both at the undergraduate and graduate level, at two universities in Canada and the United States, we found that offering students (N = 234) the opportunity to redeem extension coupons resulted in a positive learning experience. Two key themes in our study demonstrate that the extension coupons improved students’ mental health and their level of course engagement. Our study presents implications for teaching practices and policies and provides educators with one way to increase equity in the classroom.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.