Participatory Culture for Social Justice: Students Deploying New Media as a Call to Action and Social Change
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This case study explores the experiences of two university faculty members who guided their students in the development of digital media artifacts in a participatory media space for an authentic audience. A sociology instructor guided her students in the creation of artifacts documenting issues of racial inequality on campus. Students presented university data on race and ethnicity, recorded videos depicting the personal narratives of students of color, and remixed media from university archives into an interactive map which displayed evidence of racism on campus. After sharing her classroom experience with colleagues in the law school, a second instructor was inspired to conduct a similar project. Law students developed artifacts to educate the public on the difficulties of immigration and the policy barriers which hamper lawful attempts to immigrate to the United States. Each class curated their artifacts online, prompting others to explore the materials and encouraging reuse of the materials in both formal and informal educational settings. Halverson’s design principles for participatory media spaces are used to frame and make meaning of the faculty participants’ experiences.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Biemiller, L. (2017, March 3). Reckoning with history: American colleges are in a position to do justice to their own history of entanglement with slavery. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(26). https://www.chronicle.com/article/Reckoning-With-History/239291
Chen, J. C., & Brown, K. L. (2012). The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language (ESL) writers: A task-based, computer-mediated approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.606224
Curwood, J. S., Magnifico, A. M., & Lammers, J. C. (2013). Writing in the wild: Writers’ motivation in fan-based affinity spaces. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.192
Fonseca, E. & Wahab, S. (2021). Reflections on teaching against white supremacy during a time of social rupture and transformation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21(4), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i4.32844
Gee, J. P. (2018). Affinity spaces: How young people live and learn online and out of school. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718762416
Halverson, E. R. (2012). Participatory media spaces: A design perspective on learning with media and technology in the twenty-first century. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire, & S. A. Barab (Eds.), Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age (pp. 244–268). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139031127.020
Jenkins, H., Itō, M., & boyd, d. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Polity Press.
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT Press.
Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Zimmermann, A. M., & Soep, E. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism. New York University Press.
Kessler, G. (2013). Collaborative language learning in co-constructed participatory culture. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.307-322
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In Proceedings of ASCILITE 2007: The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
Mueller, A., Juris, S. J., Willermet, C., Drake, E., Upadhaya, S., & Chhetri, P. (2014). Assessing interdisciplinary learning and student activism in a Water issues course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i2.4052
Parry, M. (2020, July 5). Colleges are in for a racial reckoning. Name changes are only the beginning. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/ article/colleges-are-in-for-a-racial-reckoning-decisions-about-renaming-are-only-the-beginning
Reeve, R., & Sharkawy, A. (2014). Science education for social justice using the knowledge-building communities model. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v7i2.666
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press.
Scharber, C., Isaacson, K., Pyscher, T., & Lewis, C. (2016). Participatory culture meets critical practice: Documentary film production in a youth internship program. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 15(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-01-2016-0021
Sener, J. (2007). In search of student-generated content in online education. E-Mentor, 4(21), 90–94. https://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/_xml/wydania/21/467.pdf
Tay, E., & Allen, M. (2011). Designing social media into university learning: Technology of collaboration or collaboration for technology? Educational Media International, 48(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.607319
Waldron, J., Mantie, R., Partti, H., & Tobias, E. S. (2018). A brave new world: Theory to practice in participatory culture and music learning and teaching. Music Education Research, 20(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2017.1339027
Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883