Towards Deep Learning in Online Courses: A Case Study in Cross-Pollinating Universal Design for Learning and Dialogic Teaching
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents a case study of an online course that cross-pollinated Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and dialogic teaching to facilitate deep learning. Conceptualized through the UDL framework, dialogue and dialogic teaching, and deep learning, our analysis employs the methods of design-based research and thematic analysis to unpack the pedagogical cross-pollination in facilitating deep learning in a postgraduate course in a virtual setting. In particular, we examine the course goals, major online compositions, instruction and pedagogies, and assessment. We also explore student learning experiences in approaching deep learning by analyzing their postings in the discussion forums. Findings include multiple pedagogical strategies that fostered deep learning in this online course. This study contributes to the growing literature on online teaching and learning, particularly through cross-pollinating UDL and dialogic teaching to facilitate deep learning in higher education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Akyeampong, K. (2014). Reconceptualised life skills in secondary education in the African context: Lessons learnt from reforms in Ghana. International Review of Education, 60(2), 217-234.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56.
Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th Edition). Dialogos.
Alexander, R. J. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Biggs, J. B., & Telfer, R. (1987). The process of learning. Prentice-Hall of Australia.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th Edition). Pearson Education.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Boyd, M., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272-296.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
CAST. (2022). About Universal Design for Learning. https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163-177). Sage.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning. Routledge.
Evmenova, A. (2018). Preparing teachers to use Universal Design for Learning to support diverse learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 147-171.
Farooq, S., & Benade, L. (2019). Constructing a dialogic pedagogy in virtual learning environments: A literature review. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 16(1&2), 7-12.
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. M., Uijl, S. G., & Prins, F. J. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computer & Education, 125, 86-100.
Fornauf, B. S., & Erickson, J. D. (2020). Toward an inclusive pedagogy through universal design for learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(2), 183-199.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
Guzmán, V., & Larrain, A. (2021). The transformation of pedagogical practices into dialogic teaching: Towards a dialogic notion of teacher learning. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1902837
Hambacher, E., Ginn, K., & Slater, K. (2018). From serial monologue to deep dialogue: Designing online discussions to facilitate student learning in teacher education courses. Action in Teacher Education, 40(3), 239-252. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01626620.2018.1486753
He, Y. (2014). Universal Design for Learning in an online teacher education course: Enhancing learners’ confidence to teach online. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 283-298.
Johnson, C, Hill, L., Lock, J., Altowairiki, N., Ostrowski, C., Santos, L., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using design-based research to develop meaningful online discussions in undergraduate field experience courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 35-53.
Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125-147.
Lankshear, C. (1993). Functional literacy from a Freirean point of view. In: McLaren P., & Leonard, P. (Eds), Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter (pp.90–118). Routledge.
Mui, M. S. (2013). Dialogic pedagogy in Hong Kong: Introducing art and culture. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 12(4), 408-423.
Razzak, N. A. (2020). Paulo Freire’s critical and dialogic pedagogy and its implications for the Bahraini educational context. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(9), 999-1010.
Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive Instructional Design: Applying UDL to Online Learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/101/kr
Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to design standard-based Lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016680688
Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211-229.
Rohfeld, R. W., & Hiemstra, R. (1995). Moderating discussions in the electronic classroom. In Z. L. Berge & M. P. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the online classroom, 3, Distance education (pp. 91–104). Hampton.
Rose, D.H, Harbour, W.S., Johnston, C.S., Daley, S.G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 135-151.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in Universal Design for Learning. Harvard Education Press.
Shor, I. (1993). Education is politics: Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy. In McLaren, P., & Leonard, P, (Eds), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 24–35). Routledge.
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogic method” of teaching? The Journal of Education, 169(3), 11-31.
Skinner, D. (2010). Effective teaching and learning in practice. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Smith, T. W., & Colby, S. A. (2007). Teaching for deep learning. The Clearing House, 80(5), 205-210.
Sousa, A. N. (2019). Dialogue in online learning spaces: How transitioning to online learning during a pandemic impacts classroom dialogue and inclusivity. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10 (Special Issue), 229-237.
Wang, C. H. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 303-313.