Preservice Teachers’ Shifting Perspectives of Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Service-Learning Experiences

Main Article Content

Stephanie Devine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-2908
Cynthia C. Massey
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-6016
Kathryn L. Haughney
Akintomide Adebile

Abstract

Abstract: Preservice teachers often have low post-school expectations for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) although the stated goal of special education is to increase those very outcomes. However, setting high expectations and learning the accompanying soft skills is a complex skill set to include in special education teacher training. This qualitative study (n = 7) uses the consensual qualitative research-modified method to analyze preservice teachers’ shifts in perception of students with IDD following a service-based, extended field experience with college students with IDD who attend a university’s inclusive postsecondary education [IPSE] program. The service-learning experience included both planned and unplanned activities that were also a part of the curriculum for students enrolled in the IPSE program. Researchers identified six primary domains: (1) content knowledge, (2) getting to know students, (3) helping students, (4) preservice teachers needing support, (5) social and emotional connections, and (6) misconceptions. The resulting core ideas suggest that special education teacher training with extended service learning may help candidates to see the whole person with IDD and that instruction for teacher development can be enriched through applied learning opportunities. Conclusions position subsequent inquiry to explore service-learning outcomes and preservice teacher soft skill development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Devine, S., Massey, C., Haughney, K., & Adebile, A. (2024). Preservice Teachers’ Shifting Perspectives of Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Service-Learning Experiences. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v24i3.35302
Section
Articles

References

Athamanah, L. S., Fisher, M. H., Sung, C., & Han, J. E. (2020). The experiences and perceptions of college peer mentors interacting with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920953826

Bhattacharjee, S., & Roy, P. (2022). The effect of scaffolding: As instructional technique on differently abled students. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 7(2), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2022.v07.i02.008

Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Promoting teacher quality and retention in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370050101

Buchanan, A. M., Baldwin, S. C., & Rudisill, M. E. (2002). Service learning as scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008030

Carter, E. W., Gustafson, J. R., Mackay, M. M., Martin, K. P., Parsley, M. V., Graves, J., Day, T. L., McCabe, L. E., Lazarz, H., McMillan, E. D., Schiro-Geist, C., Williams, M., Beeson, T., & Cayton, J. (2018). Motivations and expectations of peer mentors within inclusive higher education programs for students with intellectual disability. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418779989

Causton-Theoharis, J. N. (2009). The Golden Rule of providing support in inclusive classrooms: Support others as you would wish to be supported. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(2), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904200204

Cavendish, W., Morris, C. T., Chapman, L. A., Ocasio-Stoutenburg, L., & Kibler, K. (2019). Teacher perceptions of implementation practices to support secondary students in special education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2019.1628000

Cho, H.-J., Wehmeyer, M., & Kingston, N. (2013). Factors that predict elementary educators’ perceptions and practice in teaching self-determination. Psychology in the Schools, 50(8), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21707

Clark, K. A. (2018). The Generalized Effects of Upgrade Your Performance on Employment Soft Skills of Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Study of Generalization (Publication No. 10788735) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Coates, J. K., Harris, J., & Waring, M. (2020). The effectiveness of a special school experience for improving preservice teachers’ efficacy to teach children with special educational needs and disabilities. British Educational Research Journal, 46(5), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3605

Dey, P., Panda, A., & Banerjee, M. (2014). Impact of vygotskian intervention on persons with intellectual impairment. Psychological Studies, 59(3), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0252-z

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 137 Supreme Court 988 (U.S. 2017).

Forlin, C., Loreman, T., Sharma, U., & Earle, C. (2009). Demographic differences in changing preservice teachers’ attitudes, sentiments and concerns about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701365356

Garrels, V., & Arvidsson, P. (2019). Promoting self-determination for students with intellectual disability: A vygotskian perspective. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 22, 100241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.006

Gao, W., & Mager, G. (2011). Enhancing preservice teachers’ sense of efficacy and attitudes

toward school diversity through preparation: A case of one U.S. inclusive teacher education program. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 1-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ937178.pdf

Grue, J. (2016). The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique. Disability & Society, 31(6), 838-849.

Higher Education Opportunity Act, Pub. L. No. 110-315, 122 Stat. 3078 (2008). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-110publ315/pdf/PLAW-110publ315.pdf

Hill, C. E. & Knox, S. (2021). Consensual qualitative research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000215-000

Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counceling Psychologist, 25(4), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001

Holwerda, A., Brouwer, S., de Boer, M. R., Groothoff, J. W., van der Klink, J.J.L. (2015). Expectations from different perspectives on future work outcome of young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 25, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9528-3

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

Kahn, S., & Lewis, A. R. (2014). Survey on teaching science to K-12 students with disabilities: Teacher preparedness and attitudes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 885–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9406-z

Kuh, F. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges & Universities. ISBN: 978-0-9796181-4-7

Kurth, J. A., & Foley, J. A. (2014). Reframing teacher preparation: Preparing teachers for inclusive education. Inclusion, 2(4), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-2.4.286

Landmark, L. J., Song Ju, & Dalun Zhang. (2010). Substantiated best practices in transition: Fifteen Plus years later. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810376410

Malmgren, K. W., & Causton-Theoharis, J. N. (2006). Boy in the bubble: Effects of paraprofessional proximity and other pedagogical decisions on the interactions of a student with behavioral disorders. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540609594569

Merton, R. K. (1949). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review 8(2), 193–210.

https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267

Paulk, W., & Owens, R. J. Q. (2010). How to study in college (10 ed.). Wadsworth. ISBN-10: 1439084467

Pennington, R. C., & Courtade, G. R. (2014). An examination of teacher and student behaviors in classrooms for students with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919141

Radford, J., Bosanquet, P., Webster, R., & Blatchford, P. (2015). Scaffolding learning for independence: Clarifying teacher and teaching assistant roles for children with special educational needs. Learning and Instruction, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.005

Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2006). Teacher expectations and student self-perceptions: Exploring relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20169

Rosenthal, R, and L. Jacobsen. Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual

development. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

Ruppar, A. L., Roberts, C. A., & Olson, A. J. (2017). Perceptions about expert teaching for students with severe disabilities among teachers identified as experts. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917697311

Think College National Coordinating Center Accreditation Workgroup (2021). Model Accreditation Standards for Higher Education Programs for Students with Intellectual Disability. University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion. https://thinkcollege.net/sites/default/files/files/TCreport_accred_modelstandards_2021.pdf

Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J. (2006). Relation between teachers' early expectations and students' later perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.75

van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review 22, 271–296 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Van Laarhoven, T. R., Munk, D. D., Lynch, K., Bosma, J., & Rouse, J. (2007). A model for

preparing special and general education preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 440-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107306803

Wehmeyer, M. L., Sands, D. J., Doll, B., & Palmer, S. (1997). The development of self-determination and implications for educational interventions with students with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 44(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655970440403

What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). Find what works. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/