Technology-Focused Multitasking Self-Efficacy and Performance: Whether You Think You Can or Think You Can't, You Can't

Main Article Content

Peter Doolittle
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4988-7074
Krista Wojdak
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-2540
C. Edward Watson
Dawn Adam
Gina Mariano

Abstract

Multitasking has been demonstrated to negatively impact performance across a wide range of tasks, including in the classroom, yet students continue to multitask. This study examined the relationship between college students’ perceptions and performance of technology-based multitasking. Technology-based multitasking and self-efficacy data were collected and analyzed from 265 undergraduate students. Students engaged in a technology-based multitasking perceptions survey, a video + survey multitasking task or a video-only non-multitasking task, and a technology-based self-efficacy survey. An analysis of student perceptions indicated that students understood that different tasks required different levels of mental effort to complete successfully and that multitasking across high-mental effort tasks required greater effort than multitasking across low-mental effort tasks. In addition, students in the video + survey multitasking group significantly underperformed students in the video-only non-multitasking group. Finally, the relationship between technology-based multitasking and self-efficacy was addressed in a correlational analysis between student technology-based multitasking scores and technology-based self-efficacy scores, yielding no significant relationship. The study findings indicate that most students have an understanding and awareness of multitasking, but ultimately, whether they believed they could multitask or not, multitasking significantly impeded performance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., Watson, C. E., Adam, D., & Mariano, G. (2024). Technology-Focused Multitasking Self-Efficacy and Performance: Whether You Think You Can or Think You Can’t, You Can’t. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 24(2). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/34811
Section
Articles

References

Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018

Alvarez-Risco, A., Estrada-Merino, A., de las Mercedes Anderson-Seminario, M., Mlodzianowska, S., Garcsí-Ibarr, B., Villagomez-Buele, C., & Carvache-Franco, M. (2021). Multitasking behavior in online classrooms and academic performance: Case of university students in Ecuador during COVID-29 outbreak. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0160

Auxier, B, & Anderson, M. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bandura, A. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. In J. G. Adair, D. Bélanger, & K. L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science, Vol. 1. Social, personal, and cultural aspects (pp. 51–71). Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis

Basoglu, K. Fuller, M., & Sweeney, J. (2009). Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10, 177-189. https:// doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2009.10.003

Bellur, S., Nowak, K. L., & Hull, K. S. (2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.027

Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382

Brooks, S. (2015). Does personal social media use affect efficiency and well-being? Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 26-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053

Burak, L. (2012) Multitasking in the university classroom. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060208

Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P., & Conklin, E., (2014). What else do college students "do" while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004

Carrier, L. M., Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Lim, A. F. (2015). Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.005

Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does Multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047

Donmez, O., & Akbulut, Y. (2021). Timing and relevance of secondary tasks impact multitasking performance. Computers & Education, 161, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104078

Dontre, A., (2020) The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 3, 379-289. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229

Doolittle, P. E., & Mariano, G. J. (2008). Working memory capacity and mobile multimedia learning environments: Individual differences in learning while mobile. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(4), 511-530. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16147-003

Downs, E., Tran, A., McMenemy, R., & Abegaze, N. (2015). Exam performance and attitudes toward multitasking in six, multimedia-multitasking classroom environments. Computers & Education, 86, 205-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.008

Eom, S. B. & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097

Felisoni, D., & Godio, A. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education, 117, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.006

Flanigan, A. E., & Kiewra, K. A. (2018). What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9418-2

Fried, C. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006

Froese, A., Carpenter, C., Inman, D., Schooley, J., Barnes, R., Brecht, P., & Chacon, J. (2012). Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College Student Journal, 46, 23-332.

Hall, A. C., Lineweaver, T. T., Hogan, E. E., & O’Brien, S. W. (2020). On or off task: The negative influence of laptops on neighboring students’ learning depends on how they are used. Computers & Education, 153, 103901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103901

Hanss, D., & Bohm, G. (2010) Can I make a difference? The role of general and domain-specific self-efficacy in sustainable consumption decisions. Umweltpsychologie, 46-74 https://hdl.handle.net/1956/6238

Hatlevik, O., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. (2018). Students' ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education 118, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011

Jamet, E., Gonthier, C., Cojean, S., Colliot, T., & Erhel, S. (2020). Does multitasking in the classroom affect learning outcomes? A naturalistic study. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106264

Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by ‘Net Generation’ students. Computers & Education, 56(3), 625-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.004

Junco, R., & Cotton, S.R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59, 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023

Kim, I., Kim, R., Kim, H., Kim, D., Han, K., Lee, P., Mark, G., & Lee, U. (2019). Understanding smartphone usage in college classrooms: A long-term measurement study. Computers & Education, 141, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103611

Kirschner, P., & Bruyckere, P. D. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Koch, I., Poljac, E. Müller, H., Kiesel, A., (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking – An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000144

Lawson, D., & Henderson, B. B. (2015). The costs of texting in the classroom. College Teaching, 63, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1019826

Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Karpinski, A. C., & Singh, S. (2019). College students’ multitasking behavior in online versus face-to face courses. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244018824505. https://doi.org/0.1177/258244018824505

Ma, S., Steger, D. G., Doolittle, P. E., Lee, A. H., Griffin, L. E. & Stewart, A. (2020). Persistence of multitasking distraction following the use of smartphone-based clickers. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 64-72. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3652.pdf

McAvay, G., Seeman, T., & Rodin, J. (1996). A longitudinal study of change in domain-specific self-efficacy among older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 51B(5), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/51B.5.P243

Mendoza, J. S. Pody, B. C., Lee, S., Kim, M., & McDonough, I. M. (2018). The effect of cell phones on attention and learning: The influences of time, distraction, and nomophobia. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.027

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

Pollard, M., & Courage, M. (2017). Working memory capacity predicts effective multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.008

Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R. Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002

Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003

Sanbonmatsu, D., Strayer, D., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking, PLOS, 8(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402

Saville, J. & Foster, L. (2021). Does technology self-efficacy influence the effect of training presentation mode on training self-efficacy? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100124

Schunk D.H. (1995) Self-Efficacy and education and instruction. In J. Maddux (Ed.) Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (p. 281-303). The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10

Seddon, A., Law, A., Adams, A., & Simmons, F. (2021). Individual differences in media multitasking ability: The importance of cognitive flexibility. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100068

Sumuer, E. (2021). The effect of mobile phone usage policy on college students' learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 2810295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09265-9

Tsai, C.-C., Chuang, S.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, M.-J. (2011). Self-efficacy in Internet-based learning environments: A literature review. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 222-240. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.4.222

Valtonen, T., Pontinen, S., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., Vaisanen, P., & Hacklin, S. (2011). Confronting the technological pedagogical knowledge of Finnish Net Generation student teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.534867

Wammes, J., Ralph, B., Mills, C., Bosch, N., Duncan, T. & Smilek, D., (2019). Disengagement during lectures: Media multitasking and mind wandering in university classrooms. Computers & Education, 132, 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.007

Watson, C. E., Terry, K., & Doolittle, P. E. (2012). Please read while texting and driving. In J.E. Groccia & L. Cruz (Eds.), To Improve the Academy, volume 31 (pp. 295-308). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2012.tb00688.x

Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers and Education, 58(1), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029

Wu, J. Y. (2017). The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: Implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies. Computers & Education, 106, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.010

Zhang, W. (2015). Learning variables, in-class laptop multitasking and academic performance: A path analysis. Computers & Education, 81, 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.012

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7