Inclusion of Online Students in a Campus-Wide Research Symposium

Main Article Content

Sandra Gilliland
Nathan J. Sammons

Abstract

This article communicates a methodology for and benefits of including online student presentations in an on-campus research symposium named Scholar Day at A (SDA). The authors provide an account of how SDA was structured to allow participation of online students; and how, during an aggressive outbreak of COVID-19 in the Spring of 2020, the event was shifted online. Student feedback was collected in both quantitative and qualitative formats. Data suggest students were satisfied with the events and felt SDA accomplished the primary goal, “to highlight the scholarly work of LSUA students.”  The method of including online students was refined in each of the three years to identify the most effective model of inclusion for online students. The authors conclude that, while there are challenges to accommodating online student presentations, the benefits of their inclusion are far greater both to the participating students and to the larger campus community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gilliland, S., & Sammons, N. J. (2023). Inclusion of Online Students in a Campus-Wide Research Symposium. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v23i4.34470
Section
Case Studies
Author Biography

Nathan J. Sammons, Louisiana State University at Alexandria

Dr. Nathan J. Sammons is an Associate Professor of Biology and the Department Chair of Biological Sciences. He was recently named the Assistant Vice Chancellor of Engaged Teaching and Learning. 

References

Banoor, R. Y., Rennie, F., & Santally, M. I. (2018). The relationship between quality of student

contribution in learning activities and their overall performances in an online course.

European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 21(1), 16–31.

Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning, 19(2), 25–32.

Faulconer, E. K., Griffith, J., Wood, B., Acharyya, S., & Roberts, D. (2018). A comparison of online, video synchronous, and traditional learning modes for an introductory undergraduate physics course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 404–411.

Gilliland, S. (2020, May 1). Opening Remarks. Scholar Day at A 2020

Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C., & Conway, K. (2015). Prior online course experience and GPA as

predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education,

, 11–17.

Hausmann, L., Schofield, J., & Woods, R. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48, 803-839.

Hunn, V. (2014). African American students, retention, and team-based learning: A review of the literature and recommendations for retention at predominately White institutions. Journal of Black Studies, 45(4), 301-314.

Kentnor, H. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 21-34.

Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact Education Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to

Them, and Why They Matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Love, D. (2008). Revitalizing retention efforts for African American college students at predominately White institutions. Allied Academies International Conference: Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 13(2), 41-46.

Seaman, J. E., Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.

Sell AJ, Naginey A, Standon CA. 2018. The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Academic

Success. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 1(3): 19-29.

Sener, J. (2012). The seven futures of American education: Improving learning and teaching

in a screen captured world. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.

Slover, E., & Mandernach, J. (2018). Beyond online versus face-to-face comparisons: The interaction of student age and mode of instruction on academic achievement. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–8.

Tanyel, F., & Griffin, J. (2014). A ten-year comparison of outcomes and persistence rates in online versus face-to-face courses. B> Quest, 1–22.

https://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2014/onlinecourses2014.pdf

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Vella, E. J., Turesky, E. F., & Hebert, J. (2016). Predictors of academic success in web-based

courses: Age, GPA, and instruction mode. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 586–600.

Yang, Y., Cho, Y. J., & Watson, A. (2015). Classroom motivational climate in online and face-to-face undergraduate courses: The interplay of gender and course format. International Journal

of E-Learning & Distance Education, 30(1), 1–14