Main Article Content
This case study examined the development and evaluation of an interdisciplinary first-year learning community designed to stimulate scientific reasoning. Designed to serve the needs of scholarship students majoring in mathematics and natural sciences, the six-credit learning community course was writing-intensive and emphasized general scientific reasoning and critical thinking skills. Success of the course was measured using a pretest-posttest design that assessed students’ paranormal beliefs. Outcomes of the study indicated students’ paranormal beliefs were significantly lower at the end of the semester than at the beginning, which was used as a surrogate measure of critical thinking that was also relevant to the course content. Supplementary analyses demonstrated that their (a) paranormal beliefs were significantly lower than other students and (b) students self-identified the importance of the scientific reasoning skills learned in the course without being prompted on their teacher-course evaluations. The results of this study can inform the design of interdisciplinary, scientific reasoning courses.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227-1236.
Aaron, J. E. (2003). The Little, Brown essential handbook for writers. New York: AddisonWesley Educational Publishers.
Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1993). An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention program in the high school science curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 11(1), 1-29.
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds) (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Browne, M. N., & Minnick, K. J. (2005). The unnecessary tension between learning communities and intellectual growth. College Student Journal, 39, 775-783.
Cheung, C., Rudowicz, E., Kwan, A. S. F., & Yue, X. D. (2002). Assessing university students' general and specific critical thinking. College Student Journal, 36, 504-525.
Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, National Research Council. (1999). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi –experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
Dabney, D., Green, L., & Topalli, V. (2006) Freshman learning communities in criminology and criminal justice: An effective tool for enhancing student recruitment and learning outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(1), 44-68.
Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529-544.
Dodge, L., & Kendall, M. (2004). Learning communities. College Teaching, 52(4), 150-5.
Druger, M. (2002). More than science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 340 – 1.
Easton, T. A. (2002). Taking sides: Clashing and controversial views in science, technology, and society, 5th ed. Gilford, Ct.: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.
Easton, T. A. (2004). Taking sides: Clashing and controversial views in science, technology, and society, 6th ed. Gilford, Ct.: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.
Farha, B., & Steward, G. (2006). Paranormal beliefs: An analysis of college students. The Skeptical Inquirer, 30(1), 37-40.
Halpern, D.F. (1997). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Halpern, D.F., (1998) Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449-455.
Hergovich, A., & Arendasy, M. (2005). Critical thinking ability and belief in the paranormal. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1805-1812.
Kokkala, I., & Gessell, D. A. (2002). Writing science effectively: Placing biology and english students in an author-editor relationship. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32, 252-57.
Inkelas, K.K., & Weisman, J.L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 335-368.
Inkelas, K.K., Soldner, M., Longerbeam, S.D., & Leonard, J.B. (2008). Differences in student outcomes by types of living-learning programs: The development of an empirical typology. Research in Higher Education, 49, 495-512.
Inkelas, K.K., Daver, Z.E., Vogt, K.E., & Leonard, J.B. (2007). Living-learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college. Research in Higher Education, 48, 403-434.
Learning Communities National Resource Center. (n.d.). Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education at Evergreen State College Retrieved on January 30, 2013 from http://www3.evergreen.edu/wacenter/pResources.asp?pid=73
Lester, J. D., & Lester, J. D., Jr. (2003). Principles of writing research papers. New York: Pearson Education.
Loo, R., & Thorpe, K. (1999). A psychometric investigation of scores on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal new form S. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 995-1003.
McMurray, M. A., Beisenherz, P., & Thompson, B. (1991). Reliability and concurrent validity of a measure of critical thinking skills in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 183-191.
Messer, W.S., & Griggs, R.A. (1989). Student belief and involvement in the paranormal and performance in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 187-191.
Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in higher education, 38(4), 506-522.
Morgan, P., Carter, J., Lemons, J., Grumbling, O., & Saboski, E. (1995). Preliminary assessment of a science learning community for first-year students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 25(2), 102-109.
National Research Council. (1998). National science education standards, fifth printing. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Nelson, C. E. (1999). On the persistence of unicorns: The trade-off between content and critical thinking revisited. In R. Aminzade and B. Pescosolido (eds.), The social worlds of higher education: A handbook for teaching in a new century (168-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Pascarella, E. T., Palmer, B., Moye, M., & Pierson, C. T. (2001). Do diversity experiences influence the development of critical thinking? Journal of College Student Development, 42, 257-271.
Quitadamo, I, Brahler, C.J., & Crouch, G.J. (2009). Peer led team learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate science courses. Science Educator, 18, 29-39.
Renaud, R. D., & Murray, H.G. (2008). A comparison of a subject-specific and a general measure of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 85-93.
Roe, C.A., (1999). Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal: A re-evaluation. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 85-98.
Royalty, J., (1995). The generalizability of critical thinking: Paranormal beliefs versus statistical reasoning. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 477-488.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shermer, M. (2002). Why people believe weird things: Pseudo-science, superstition, and bogus notions of our time. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
Smith, B.L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., & Gabelnick, F. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education. San Francisco John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tobacyk, J., & Milford, G. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029-1037.
Watson, G.B., & Glaser, E. M. (2008). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal short form manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
Yoder, J. D., & Hochevar, C.M. (2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 91-95.