Main Article Content
Research suggests that reading compliance among undergraduate students is low. This study assessed the factors that influence students’ decisions to comply with their assigned course readings using two theoretical underpinnings: students’ ability to self-ration time and construal effects on their decision process. Data collected through focus group discussions with undergraduate students and analyzed using qualitative methods suggested that both these behavioral economics theories may provide valuable insight into students’ decision-making behavior related to reading compliance. The study found that students’ decisions to read are influenced by both personal and external factors, several of which pertain to their instructors. Students also admitted that lack of time and their inability to self-ration time towards reading tasks negatively impact their reading compliance behavior. The study found evidence of construal effects in the students’ understanding of the potential benefits of reading compliance, given that several of these benefits would occur beyond their immediate future. The conceptual mapping of the results offers several propositions for future research.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Ando, A., & Modigliani, F. (1963). The" life cycle" hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. The American Economic Review, 53(1), 55-84.
Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines and performance. Working Papers-INSEAD R And D.
Baier, K., Hendricks, C.,Gorden, K.W., Hendricks, J. E., & Cochran, L. (2011). College students' textbook reading, or not! American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook 31.
Baumeister, R., Sparks, E., Stillman, T., & Vohs, K. (2008). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 4-13.
Bean, J.C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 149-165.
Burchfield, C. M., & Sappington, J. (2000). Compliance with required reading assignments. Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 58-60.
Camerer, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, and M. Rabin. (Eds.). Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 3-51). New York and Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation Press and Princeton University Press.
Carrillo, J. D., & Mariotti, T. (2000). Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. The Review of Economic Studies, 67(3), 529-544.
Clump, M. A., Bauer, H., & Bradley, C. (2004). The extent to which psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 227-232.
Clump, M. A. & Doll, J. (2007). Do levels of reading course material continue? An examination in a forensic psychology graduate program. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(4), 242-246.
Connor-Greene, P.A. (2000). Assessing and promoting student learning: Blurring the line between teaching and testing. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 84-88.
Coulter, C. J., & Smith, S. (2012). The impact of preclass reading assignments on class performance. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 109-112.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (pp. 145-173, 3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Culver, T. F. (2008). An investigation of study guides and quizzes to improve college students' reading compliance, comprehension, and metacognitive strategies. United States -- Mississippi, Mississippi State University. Ph.D.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137-149.
Fern, E. F. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 1-13.
Flores J.G., & Alonso C.G. (1995) Using focus groups in educational research, Evaluation Review, 19(1), 84-101.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367.
Gross Davis, B. (1999). Cooperative learning: Students working in small groups. Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching, 10(2), 1-2.
Gurung, R. A. R., & Martin, R. C. (2011). Predicting textbook reading: The textbook assessment and usage scale. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 22-28.
Heath, C., & Soll, J. B. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 40-52.
Hobson, E. (2004). Getting students to read: Fourteen tips. IDEA Paper. No. 40. http://www.idea.ksu.edu (under "Idea Papers" in left column).
Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer selfcontrol. Journal of Consumer Research, 492-507.
Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(2), 1277-1288.
Janick-Buckner, D. (1997). Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature: An approach used in an advanced cell biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, 29–32.
Johnson, B. C., & Kiviniemi, M.T. (2009). The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in an undergraduate social psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 33-37.
Kitzinger J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299-302.
Kouyoumdjian, H. (2004). Influence of unannounced quizzes and cumulative exam on attendance and study behavior. Teaching of Psychology, 31(2), 110-111.
Krueger, R. A., & Kasey, M.A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dube, L. (1995). Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110-119.
Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K.A., Gorney, S.E., & Herschbach, T.R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219-229.
Liberman, N., & Trope , Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
Liberman, N., Trope , Y., & Wakslak , C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y. & Stephan, E. (2007). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (second edition). New York, USA, Guilford, 353-383
Lineweaver, T. T. (2010). Online discussion assignments improve students' class preparation. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 204-209.
Loewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. (2003). Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation
Marek, P., & Christopher, A.N. (2011). What happened to the first “R”? Students' perceptions of the role of textbooks in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 237-242.
McClelland, M. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2011), Self-regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 29–44. doi: 10.1002/cd.302
McCrea, S., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. (2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19(2), 1308-1314.
McMinn, M. R., Tabor, A., Trihub, B.L., Taylor, L., & Dominquez. A.W. (2009). Reading in graduate school: A survey of doctoral students in clinical psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4), 233-239.
Merriam, S.B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 18-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Monaco, M., & Martin, M. (2007). The Millennial Student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2, 42-46.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2001). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Newman, I., Newman, D., & Newman, C. (2011). Writing research articles using mixed methods: Methodological considerations to help you get published. In Rocco TS, Hatcher T, eds. The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 191-208). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Novak, J.D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (pp.228-229, 2nd Ed). New York, NY: Routledge.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (pp.209-339, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rich, S.S. (2005). Perceptions of health status and play activities in parents of overweight Hispanic toddlers and preschoolers. Family Community Health, 28(2), 130.
Sappington, J., Kinsey, K., & Munsayac, K. (2002). Two studies of reading compliance among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 272-274.
Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1101.
Schmeichel, B., Vohs, K., & Duke, C. (2010). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2) 181-188.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Paradigm issues in mixed methods research. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in social and behavioural sciences.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Uskul, A. K., & Eaton, J. (2005). Using graded questions to increase timely reading of assigned material. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 116-118.
Vohs, K., & Baumerister, R. (2010). Handbook of Self-Regulation, Second Edition: Research, Theory, and Applications. A Division of Guilford Publication Inc.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
Wertenbroch, K. (2001). Self-Rationing: Self-Control in consumer choice INSEAD Working Paper. No. 2001/63/MKT. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=296954 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.296954
Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Hedonic interactions between choice and consumption, Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 105-107.
Wilson, D.K. (2005). Brief report: A qualitative study of gender preferences and motivational factors for physical activity in underserved adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30(3), 293.
Wolff, R.F. (2002). A phenomenological study of in-church and televised worship. In Merriam S B, ed. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 96-119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zeilik, M. Concept Mapping. Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide Web site. http://www. flaguide.org/extra/download/cat/conmap/conmap.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2012.