Main Article Content
Education students at a large research university participated in internships during their final semesters as part of their respective programs of study as a capstone experience. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect data on the perceptions of interns’ readiness and knowledge of evidence-based practices to manage classroom behaviors for students with exceptionalities in inclusive settings. Emergent themes include general feeling of readiness to manage classroom behaviors. However, a desire for earlier access to actual classroom experiences was also expressed, as was the desire for greater instruction in evidence-based practices to manage behaviors for students with exceptionalities.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Backhus, D. A., & Thompson, K. W. (2006). Addressing the nature of science in preservice science teacher preparation programs: Science educator perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 65-81.
Billingsley, B., Israel, M., & Smith, S. (2011). Supporting new special education teachers: How online resources and web 2.0 technologies can help. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(5), 20-29.
Boe, E. E., Shin, S., & Cook, L. H. (2007). Does teacher preparation matter for beginning teachers in either special or general education? Journal of Special Education, 41(3), 158 170.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colon, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252.
Colvin, G. (2007). 7 Steps for Developing a Proactive Schoolwide Discipline Plan: A Guide for Principals and Leaderships Teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cooper, J. E., Kurtts, S., Baber, C. R., & Vallecorsa, A. (2008). A model for examining teacher preparation curricula for inclusion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 155-176.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Retrieved from the Center for American Progress website:http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/10/pdf/teacher_effectiveness.pdf
Department of Education (ED), Office of Planning, Evaluation and, Policy Development. (2010). A blueprint for reform. the reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act. US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ucf.edu/login?URL=http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.ucf.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED508795&site=ehost-live
Dillman, D.A., & Bowker, D. K. (2000). The web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In B. Batinic, U.D.Reips, M. Bosnjak & A. Werner (Eds.), Online Social Sciences (pp. 53-72). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Public L. No. 94-142 (1975).
Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1965).
Fernandez, M. L., & Erbilgin, E. (2009). Examining the supervision of mathematics student teachers through analysis of conference communications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 93-110.
Forlin, C., Loreman, T., Sharma, U., & Earle, C. (2009). Demographic differences in changing pre-service teachers' attitudes, sentiments and concerns about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 195-209.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Education Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
Fuller, F. F., & Brown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher Education: Seventy-fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Transaction.
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hair, F. H., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hughes, C. E., Stapleton, C. B., & O’Connor, M. (2006). The Evolution of a Framework for Mixed Reality Experiences in Emerging Technologies of Augmented Reality: Interfaces and Design. Idea Group, Inc., Hershey: PA.
Jukes, I., & McCain, T. (2011). Understanding the digital generation. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyfluency.com/perspectives/UDG_perspective.pdf
Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94-101.
Katz, L. G. (1972). Developmental stages of preschool teachers. Elementary School Journal, 73(1), 50-54.
Keller, C. L., Brady, M. P., & Taylor, R. L. (2005). Using self evaluation to improve student teacher interns' use of specific praise. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(4), 368-376.
Kenny, R. W. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Retrieved from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/673918d46fbf653e852565ec0056ff3e/955b61ffddd590a852565ec005717ae/$FILE/boyer.pdf
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lane, K. L., & Carter, E. W. (2006). Supporting transition-age youth with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders at the secondary level: A need for further inquiry. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 66-70.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McKinney, S. E., Haberman, M., Stafford-Johnson, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). Developing teachers for high-poverty schools. Urban Education, 43(1), 68-82.
Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 39-56.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
National Center for, L. D. (2007). Commission on no child left behind summary of key recommendations affecting students with learning disabilities. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education Blue Ribbon Panel (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Retrieved from the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education website: http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3d&tabid=715
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 115 U.S.C. § 1425 et seq. (2002).
Oblinger, D. G. (2008). Games and Learning: Digital Games have the potential to bring play back to the learning experience. Educause Quarterly, 3, 5-7.
Regan, K. S. (2009). Improving the way we think about students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41(5), 60-65.
Regan, K. S., & Michaud, K. M. (2011). Best practices to support student behavior. Beyond Behavior, 20(2), 40-47.
Reschly, D. J., & Holdheide, L. (2008). Innovation configurations: Implementing evidence based practices in teacher preparation (Report for National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality). Washington, DC: NCCTQ.
Reschly, D., Oliver, R., Schumaker, J., Smartt, S., & Holdheide, L. (2009). Innovation configurations: Implementing evidence-based practices in teacher preparation. Retrieved from the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality website: http://www.tqsource.org/webcasts/innovationConfigurations_CriticalAreas/DanReschly.pdf
Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Gable, R. A., & Zigmond, N. P. (2009). Virtual coaching for novice teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 36-41.
Scheeler, M. C., McKinnon, K., & Stout, J. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via webcam and bug-in-ear technology on preservice teacher performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(1), 77-90.
Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(1), 351-380.
Slavin, R. E. (2007). Educational Research in an Age of Accountability. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining the school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
Vasquez, E., & Slocum, T. A. (2011). Evaluation of synchronous online tutoring for students at risk of reading failure. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 221-235.
Vince Garland, K. M., Vasquez, E., & Pearl, C. (2012). Efficacy of individualized clinical coaching in a virtual reality classroom for increasing teachers’ fidelity of implementation of discrete trial teaching. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 502-515.
Westling, D. L. (2010). Teachers and challenging behavior: Knowledge, views, and practices. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 48-63.
White, M., & Mason, C. Y. (2006). Components of a successful mentoring program for beginning special education teachers: Perspectives from new teachers and mentors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(3), 191-201.