Free Listening Developing Skills for Dialogic Praxis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Given the widespread ideological polarization of the current times, cultivating ways to empathize across difference has never been more important. In this essay, we outline Free Listening (FL), a pedagogical practice that helps people grow their capacity to empathetically engage others across difference by engaging in structured sessions of active empathetic listening. Our prior work demonstrates that the structured practice of FL has both affective and practical implications for how students engage with others; students leave the practice with a greater sense of awareness, appreciation for other cultures, and ability to listen across cultural and ideological boundaries. We believe FL has great promise within the teaching-and-learning process in relation to civic and community engagement, service learning, and relational praxis. In this essay, we outline the practice of FL and review literature that helps elucidate what this practice is and does. Some key themes are discussed that reveal the valuable contributions of this practice as they have emerged from our students’ and our own experience with/in FL. Finally, we trace the pedagogical implications of FL as they connect to theories of dialogue and dialogic praxis. Overall, we argue that FL should be a regular practice for pedagogues across the social sciences in order to cultivate in students the relational and empathetic skills that are needed to advance the project of depolarization—a project in which other-centeredness should be a defining feature.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson, & N. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guilford Press.
Bischoff, P. (2019, April 8). Posting about politics?: 44.6% of people find you’re annoying. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/internet-providers/political-posts-on-social-media/
Bodie, G. D. (2011). The active-empathetic listening scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, (59)3, 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583495
Broome, B. (2009). Dialogue theories. In S. W. Littlejohn, & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 1, pp. 302-306). SAGE. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384.n111
Buber, M. (2006). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
Burleson, B. R. (2011). A constructivist approach to listening. The International Journal of Listening, 25, 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2011.536470
Dewey, J. (2015). Experience and education (First Free Press edition). First Free Press.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Grant, D. (2020, July 15). On ‘difficult’ conversations. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/07/15/why-classroom-conversations-about-diversity-and-identity-shouldnt-be-framed
Gurin, P., Nagda, B., & Lopez, G. (2004). The benefits of diversity of education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00097.x
Jones, R. P., & Najle, M. (2019, February 22). American democracy in crisis: The fate of pluralism in a divided nation. PRRI. https://www.prri.org/research/american-democracy-in-crisis-the-fate-of-pluralism-in-a-divided-nation/.
Maruyama, G., & Moreno, J. (2000). University faculty views about the value of diversity on campus and in the classroom. In G. Maruyama, J. Moreno, R. Gudeman, & P. Marin (Eds.), Does diversity make a difference?: Three research studies on diversity in college classrooms (pp. 9 –36). American Council on Education and American Association of University Professors
Pasque, P. A., Chesler, M. A., Charbeneau, J., & Carlson, C. (2013). Pedagogical approaches to student racial conflict in the classroom. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031695
Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. SAGE.
Polack, E. (2018, May 1). New Cigna study reveals loneliness at epidemic levels in America. https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/news-and-views/press-releases/2018/new-cigna-study-reveals-loneliness-at-epidemic-levels-in-america
Schure, M. B., Christopher, J., & Christopher, S. (2008). Mind–body medicine and the art of self‐care: Teaching mindfulness to counseling students through yoga, meditation, and qigong. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00625.x
Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: Integrating mindfulness into psychology and the helping professions. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11885-000
Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65(2-3), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373169
Sue, D. W., Lin, A. I., Torino, G. C., Capodilupo, C. M., & Rivera, D. P. (2009). Racial microaggressions and difficult dialogues on race in the classroom. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014191
Tietsort, C. J., & Hanners, K. A. (2019). Free Listening: An experience in relational reflexivity [Unpublished manuscript]. The Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University.
Tietsort, C. J., Hanners, K. A., Tracy, S. J., & Adame, E. A. (2020). Free Listening: Identifying and evaluating listening barriers through empathic listening. Communication Teacher, 35(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2020.1851734
Urban Confessional (n.d.). Urban Confessional: A Free Listening project. https://urbanconfessional.org/join
Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1-2), 98-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067