Can Developing Virtues Improve Dialogue Across Political Difference? The Case Study of Philosophy 291: Dialogue and Civil Discourse
Main Article Content
Abstract
After the polarizing 2016 presidential election, I heard from many distressed students who felt they lacked the skills or confidence to have difficult conversations with those who disagreed with them politically. In response, I developed a course that aims to help students grow in the virtues and skills necessary for listening and dialogue, putting these to use discussing controversial issues including abortion, gun rights and regulations, cancel culture, speech on campus, immigration, environmental policy, and kneeling for the national anthem. In this article, I make the case for foregrounding virtues such as attentiveness, curiosity, intellectual humility, and empathy to promote good dialogue and prepare students to engage productively across difference. Then, I describe the course design, share qualitative results from student reflections, and highlight insights that are applicable across disciplines. Finally, I address practical obstacles and ethical concerns that have arisen when teaching polarizing topics and offer responses to these challenges.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Aristotle. (1925). Nichomachean ethics (W.D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics
Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.2.ii.html (Original work written ca. 350 B.C.E)
American Psychological Association. (2017, November 1). APA Stress in America™ Survey: US
at ‘lowest point we can remember;’ future of nation most commonly reported source of stress [Press release]. http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/11/lowest-point
Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology.
Oxford University Press.
Baehr, J. (2015). Cultivating Good Minds: A philosophical and practical guide to educating
for intellectual virtues. https://intellectualvirtues.org/cultivating-good-minds/
Brewer, J. (2019, September 24). Curiosity: Our Superpower for just about everything. Psychology Today.
Carr, P. B., Dweck, C. S., & Pauker, K. (2012). "Prejudiced" behavior without prejudice? Beliefs
about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 452–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028849
Cherry, M. (2017). What an [en]tangled web we weave: emotions, motivation, and rethinking us and the
“other.” Hypatia, 32(2), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12325
Cherry, M. (2018) The Errors and Limitations of Our “Anger-Evaluating” Ways. In Cherry M. and Flanagan
W. (Eds.), The Moral Psychology of Anger (pp. 49-65). Rowan and Littlefield International.
Dweck, C. (2016) What Having a “Growth Mindset” Actually Means. Harvard Business Review.
https://hbr.org/2016/01/what-having-a-growth-mindset-actually-means
Flaherty, C. (2021) The Skinny on Teaching Evals and Bias. Inside Higher Ed.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/02/17/whats-really-going-respect-bias-and-teaching-evals
Fotuhi, O. (2020) The Need to Combat a False Growth Mind-Set. Inside Higher Ed.
Gadamer, H.G. (1994). Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original
work published 1960).
Giebel, H. M. (2021). Ethical Excellence: Philosophers, psychologists, and real-life exemplars
show us how to achieve it. Catholic University of America Press.
Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled Empathy: An alternative ethics for our relationships with animals. Lantern Books.
Klein, E. (2020). Why We’re Polarized. Avid Reader Press.
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Newman, B. (2020). Intellectual humility in the sociopolitical domain. Self &
Identity, 19(8).
Larson, J., McNeilly, M. & Ryan T.J. (2020). Free Expression and Constructive Dialogue at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://fecdsurveyreport.web.unc.edu/wp- content/uploads/sites/22160/2020/02/UNC-Free-Expression-Report.pdf
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. http://www.cultureresearch.org/sites/default/files/pettigrew_tropp_2006_contact_theory_0.pdf
Palumbo-Liu, D. (2014, September 11). Civility is for Suckers: Campus hypocrisy and the “polity behavior”
lie. Salon. https://www.salon.com/2014/09/10/civility_is_for_suckers_campus_hypocrisy_and_the_polite_behavior_lie/
Plato. (1899). Apology (B. Jowett, Trans.). The Internet Classics
Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/apology.html (Original work written ca. 390 B.C.E)
Robbiano, C., & Scager, K. (2020). Cultivating Two Aspects of Intellectual Humility: Openness and
Care. Teaching Philosophy, 43(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2020116117
Scott, J. (2015, April 15) The New Thought Police: Why are campus administrators invoking civility to silence
critical speech? The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/new-thought-police/
Sherman, N. (2021, May 14). If You’re Reading Stoicism for Life Hacks, You’re Missing the Point.
New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/14/opinion/stoics-self-help.html
Watson, L. (2018). Educating for Good Questioning: a Tool for Intellectual Virtues Education. Acta
Analytica, 33(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-018-0350-y
Yeager, D. S., Paul, H., Gregory, M. W., Jared, S. M., Robert, C., Chandra, M., Elizabeth, T., Barbara, S.,
Chris, S. H., Cintia, P. H., David, P., Carissa, R., Kate, F., Alice, R., Jill, T., Ronaldo, I., Jenny, B.,
Sophia, M. Y., Carlos, M. C., … Carol, S. D. (n.d.). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 364-369, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y