Standards-based grading in introductory university physics

Main Article Content

Ian D Beatty

Abstract

Standards-based grading (SBG) is an approach to assessment and reporting in which scores are attached to the specific learning objectives of a course, rather than to assignments or tests. Each score represents a student’s mastery of that learning objective, and may change over time in response to evidence that her level of understanding has changed. SBG is increasingly popular in K-12 education, but has been poorly documented and studied in a university context. I explored the practicality and effects of using SBG in a moderately large university class by incorporating it into the two successive courses of an introductory physics sequence. Although design flaws and logistical difficulties plagued these attempts, most students responded positively to the basic intent and elements of the approach. Our experiences revealed likely implementation errors and suggested some wise design choices. More interestingly, I found that SBG foregrounds and forces us to confront some fundamental tensions present but latent within most or all teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Beatty, I. D. (2013). Standards-based grading in introductory university physics. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 1–22. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/3264
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Ian D Beatty, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Assistant Professor, Physics Education Research, Dept. of Physics & Atronomy

References

Beatty, I., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31.

Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A researchbased pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18(2), 146–162.

Block, J. H. (Ed.). (1971). Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing Talent in Young People. New York: Ballantine Books.

Brewe, E. (2008). Modeling theory applied: Modeling instruction in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 76(12), 1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2983148

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Starting the conversation about grading. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 10–14. http://goo.gl/pKsL7

Buell, J. (2013). Standards-based grading implementation. Always Formative (weblog). http://alwaysformative.blogspot.com/p/standards-based-grading-implementation.html

Docan, T. N. (2006). Positive and negative incentives in the classroom: An analysis of grading systems and student motivation. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 21–40. http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/view/1668/1666

Dueck, M. (2011). How I broke my rule and learned to give retests. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 72–75. http://goo.gl/GqupA

Erickson, J. A. (2011). How grading reform changed our school. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 66–70. http://goo.gl/KufkC

Guskey, T. R. (2001). Helping standards make the grade. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 20–27. http://goo.gl/nbOze

Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43(8), 73–80. http://goo.gl/lCYLR

Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60(8), 732–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17080

Ives, J. (2011). Standards-Based Grading. Science Learnification (weblog). http://learnification.wordpress.com/category/course-components/standards-based-grading/

Leonard, W. J., Hollot, C. V., & Gerace, W. J. (2008). Mastering Circuit Analysis: An innovative approach to a foundational sequence. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. F2H3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720568

Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 34–39. http://goo.gl/fXfMn

Noschese, F. (2012). Standards-Based Grading. Action-Reaction (weblog). http://fnoschese.wordpress.com/category/standards-based-grading-2/

O'Connor, K., & Wormeli, R. (2011). Reporting student learning. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 40–44. http://goo.gl/Czm1m

O'Shea, K. (2012). SBG. Physics! Blog! (weblog). http://kellyoshea.wordpress.com/category/sbg/

Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make Just One Change. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.

Rundquist, A. (2011). Standards-based grading with voice: Listening for students' understanding. (N. S. Rebello, P. V. Engelhardt, & C. Singh, Eds.) AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 69–72. http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.3679996

Rundquist, A. (2013, January 6). SBG. SuperFly Physics (weblog). Retrieved February 11, 2013, from http://arundquist.wordpress.com/category/sbg/

Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.