Changing attitudes and facilitating understanding in the undergraduate statistics classroom: A collaborative learning approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
Collaborative and problem-based learning strategies are theorized to be effective methods for strengthening undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) is a collaborative learning technique that engages students in problem solving and discussion under the guidance of a trained peer facilitator. This comparative study investigates the impact of a PLTL-based learning community program on both content mastery and dispositions of undergraduate students taking an introductory course in applied statistics. Results suggest that students participating in the learning community program acquired significantly greater content mastery in statistics when compared to non-participating peers. Moreover, the learning community experience may provide students with a buffer against developing the negative attitudes and perceptions that often pervade the undergraduate applied statistics classroom.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Baez-Galib, R. Colon-Cruz, H, & Resto, W. (2005). Chem-2-Chem: A one-to one supportive learning environment for chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(12), 1859-1863.
Barkley, E.F., Cross, K.P., & Majro, C.H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Borresen, C.R. (1990). Success in introductory statistics with small groups. College Teaching, 38(1), 26-28.
Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change, 27(1). 12-18.
Budé, L., Van De Wiel, M. W. J., Imbos, T., Candel, M. J. J. M., Broers, N. J., and Berger, M. P. F. (2007). Students' achievements in a statistics course in relation to motivational aspects and study behaviour. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 5 – 21. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ6(1)
Carnell, L.J. (2008). The effect of a student-designed data collection project on attitudes toward statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/carnell.html
Castro Sotos, A. E., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., Onghena, P. (2009). How confident are students in their misconceptions about hypothesis tests? Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/castrosotos.html
Cracolice, M.S. & Trautmann, J.A. (2001). Vygotsky’s theories of education: Theory bases for peer-led team learning. In D.K. Gosser, M.S. Cracolice, J.A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V.S. Strozak, P. Varma-Nelson (Eds), Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook (pp. 94-102). Lower Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
delMas, R.C. & Garfield, J. (1999). A model of classroom research in action: Developing simulation activities to improve students’ statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v7n3/delmas.cfm
Dempster, M. & McCorry, N.K. (2009). The role of previous experience and attitudes toward statistics in statistics assessment outcomes among undergraduate psychology students. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/dempster.html
Eberlein, T. (2012). Evaluation: Beneficial effects of PLTL persist to later courses at Penn State Schukylkill. Retrieved from www.pltlis.org.
Emmioglu, E & Capa-Aydin, Y. (2012). Attitudes and achievement in statistics: A metaanalysis study. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 95-102. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
Enders, F.B. & Diener-West, M. (2006). Methods of learning in statistical education: A randomized trial of public health graduate students. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(1), 5-19.
Evans, B. R. (2007). Student attitudes, conceptions, and achievement in introductory undergraduate college statistics. The Mathematics Educator, 17(2), 24-30.
Gafney, L. (2001). Workshop Evalution. In D.K. Gosser, M.S. Cracolice, J.A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V.S. Strozak, P. Varma-Nelson (Eds), Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook (pp. 75-93). Lower Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
GAISE (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) college report. The American Statistical Association (ASA). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/.
Gal, I. & Ginsburg, L. (1994). The role of beliefs and attitudes in learning statistics: Towards an assessment framework. Journal of Statistics Education, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v2n2/gal.html
Gal, I., Ginsburg, L., & Schau, C. (1997). Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. In I. Gal & J.B. Garfield (Eds), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 37-51). Burke, VA: IOS Press.
Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25-34.
Garfield, J. & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44 – 63.
Garfield, J. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372-396.
Ghani, S.A. (2009). Cooperative learning versus the lecture method of instruction in an introductory statistics course. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 1(1), 59-71.
Giraud, G. (1997). Cooperative learning and statistics instruction. Journal of Statistics Education, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/giraud.html
Gosser, D.K, Roth, V., Gafney, L., Kampmeier, J., Strozak, V., Varma-Nelson, P., Radel, S. & Weiner, M. (1996). Workshop Chemistry: Overcoming the Barriers to Student Success. The Chemical Educator, 1(1). doi: 10.1333/s00897960002a
Gosser, D. K., & Roth, V. (1998). The workshop chemistry project: peer-led team learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 185-187.
Gosser, D (2001). The peer-led team learning workshop model. In D.K. Gosser, M.S. Cracolice, J.A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V.S. Strozak, P. Varma-Nelson (Eds), Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook (pp. 1-12). Lower Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gosser, D. K. (2011). The PLTL boost: A critical review of research. Progressions the PLTL Project Newsletter, 14(1). Retrieved from http://www.pltl.org
Hirsch, L. S. & O’Donnell, A. M (2001). Representativeness in statistical reasoning: Identifying and assessing misconceptions. Journal of Statistics Education, 9(2). Retrieved from http://amstat.org/publications/jse/v9n2/hirsch.html.
Hockings, S.C., DeAngelis, K.J., & Frey, R.F. (2008). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: Implementation and evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(7), 990-996.
Horwitz, S. & Rodger, S.H. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. SIGCSE-09, 163-167.
Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62.
Johnson, R. T. & Johnson, D.W. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. In: J. Thousand, A. Villa & A. Nevin (Eds), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Press.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K.A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26-35.
Johnson, M. & Kuennen, E. (2006). Basic math skills and performance in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 14(2). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html.
Keeler, C.M. & Steinhorst, R. K. (1994). Cooperative learning in statistics. Teaching Statistics, 16(3), 81-84.
Konold, C. (1995). Issues in assessing conceptual understanding in probability and statistics. Journal of Statistics Education 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n1/konold.html.
Lewis, S.E. & Lewis, J.E. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 135-139.
Loui M.C. & Robbins B.A. (2008). Work-In progress-assessment of peer-led team learning in an engineering course for freshmen. Presented at the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Oct 22-25th Saratoga Springs, NY.
Lyon, D.C. & Lagowski, J.J. (2008). Effectiveness of facilitating small-group learning in large lecture classes: A general chemistry case study. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(11), 15711576.
Liou-Mark, J., Dreyfuss, A. E., & Younge, L. (2010) Peer assisted learning workshops in precalculus: An approach to increasing student success. Mathematics and Computer Education, 44(3), 249-259.
Magel, R.C. (1998). Using cooperative learning in a large introductory statistics class. Journal of Statistics Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n3/magel.html
Mastascusa, E. J., Snyder, W. J., & Hoyt, B. S. (2011). Effective instruction for STEM disciplines: From learning theory to college teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perkins, D.V. & Saris R. N. (2001). A "jigsaw classroom" technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 111-113.
Peteroy-Kelly, M.A. (2007). A discussion group program enhances the conceptual reasoning skills of students enrolled in a large lecture-format introductory biology course. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 8, 13-21.
Popejoy, K. & Asala K.S. (2013). A team approach to successful learning: Peer learning coaches in chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(3), 18-23.
Potthast, M.J. (1999). Outcomes of using small-group cooperative learning experiences in introductory statistics courses. College Student Journal, 33(1), 34-42.
Preszler, R.W. (2009). Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. CBE-Life Science Education, 8, 182-192.
Quitadamo, I.J, Brahler C. J., & Crouch, G.J. (2009). Peer-led team learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate courses. Science Educator, 18(1), 29-39.
Roseth, C.J., Garfield, J.B., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Collaboration in learning and teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/roseth.html
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Briggs, D., Iverson, H., Talbot, R. & Shepard, L.A. (2011). Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science 331, 1269-1270.
Schau, C., Stevens, J., Dauphinee, T. L., & Del Vecchio, A. (1995). The development and validation of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 868-875.
Schau, C. & Emmioglu, E. (2012). Do introductory statistics courses in the United States improve students’ attitudes? Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 86-94.
Sizemore, O.J. & Lewandowski Jr, G.W. (2009). Learning might not equal liking: Research methods course changes knowledge but not attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 90-95.
Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.
Svinicki, M.D. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. San Francisco, CA, Anker Publishing Company. (pp. 242-243)
Tenney, A., & Houck, B. (2003). Peer-led team learning in introductory biology and chemistry courses: A parallel approach. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 6, 11-20.
Tsao, Y. (2006). Teaching statistics with constructivist-based learning method to describe student attitudes toward statistics. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 3(4), 59-64.
Varma-Nelson, P. & Coppola, B.P. (2005). Team Learning. In Pienta, N., Cooper M.M.,Greenbowe, T. (Eds), Chemist’s Guide to Effecive Teaching (pp. 155-169). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Wamser, C.C. (2006). Peer-led team learning in organic chemistry: Effects on student performance, success and persistence in the course. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 15621566.
Woodward, A.E, Weiner, M., & Gosser, D. (1993). Problem-solving workshops in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(8), 651.