Predicting supervisor capacities to foster higher forms of learning through undergraduate medical student research

Main Article Content

Margaret MacDougall

Abstract

The credibility of short-term undergraduate research as a paradigm for effective learning within Medicine has been recognized. With a view to strengthening this paradigm and enhancing research-teaching linkages, this study explores whether particular types of research supervisor are pre-disposed to providing supportive learning environments.  Correspondingly, a novel solution is offered to addressing clinical governance concerns about failings in preparing students for a supercomplex world. While recommendations for addressing these concerns have previously focused on curriculum delivery and assessment, this study affords a fresh perspective through consideration of research supervisor attributes, behaviours and experiences.   Using statistical analyses of response data from a large cohort of experienced research supervisors who completed an online survey, evidence is found to suggest that staff involvement in personal research ought to enhance student learning through research. In turn, the supervisor factors which are most supportive of this effect may vary according to how we measure higher forms of learning. Supervisors are advised to design successive follow-on research projects to facilitate cross-disciplinary research. In preparing medical graduates for survival in a super-complex world, more needs to be done, however, to investigate why supervisors who see their students more regularly are more likely to provide cross-disciplinary research opportunities. By contrast, potential to engage in risk-taking behaviours and maintain or progress to an advanced stage of learning may originate more precisely with the student.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
MacDougall, M. (2014). Predicting supervisor capacities to foster higher forms of learning through undergraduate medical student research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i1.3245
Section
Articles

References

Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity. Philadelphia, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Barnett, R. (2007). A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty. New York, NY: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Connell, R. (1985). How to supervise a PhD. Vestes: Australian Universities Review, 28(2), 38 41.

Connell, R., & Manathunga, C. (2012). On doctoral education: how to supervise a PhD, 1985 2011. Australian Universities Review, 54(1), 5 - 9.

Fox, S. A. (1996). "Let the Wheelchair Through!": An Intergroup Approach to Interability Communication. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Tajfel (pp. 215 - 248). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Gibbs, G. (2002). Institutional strategies for linking research and teaching. Focus, 3, 8 -11.

GMC. (2006). Strategic Options for Undergraduate Medical Education – Final Report Source: http://www.gmc-uk.org/strategic_outcomes_final_report_jun_2006.pdf_25397182.pdf.

GMC. (2009). Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. Retrieved from http://www.gmcuk.org/static/documents/content/GMC_TD_09__1.11.11.pdf

Hammick, M., & Acker, S. (1988). Undergraduate research supervision: a gender analysis. Studies in Higher Educaton, 23(3), 335 - 347. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380296

Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup Processes, Group Structure and Social Identity. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Tajfel (pp. 65 -93). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Hughes, M. (2005). The Mythology of Research and Teaching Relationships in Universities. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the University: New Relationships Between Research, Scholarship and Teaching. Berskshire, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Illeris, K. (2004). Transformative learning in the perspective of a comprehensive learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(2), 79 - 89. doi: 10.1177/1541344603262315

MacDougall, M., & Riley, S. C. (2010). Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: What do supervisors recommend? BMC Medical Education, 10(83).

MacDougall, M. (2012). Research-teaching linkages: Beyond the divide in undergraduate Medicine. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2).

RCPSC. (2005). CanMEDS 2005 Framework. Retrieved from http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/canmeds/framework/the_7_canmeds_roles_e.pdf

Schӧn, D. A. (1999). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate (First published 1983).

Tajfel, H., Jaspars, J. M. F., & Fraser, C. (1984). The social dimension in European social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Todd, M. J., Smith, K., & Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 161 - 173.