Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://greaterexpectations.org/
Association of Experiential Education (2012). Retrieved from http://www.aee.org/about/whatIsEE
Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of Peace: The Hidden Side of History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Boyte, H. C., & Mehaffy, G. (2008). The Civic Agency Initiative. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
Caulfield, J. (2007). What motivates students to provide feedback to teachers about teaching and learning? An expectancy theory perspective. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1 – 19. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v1n1/caulfield/IJ_Caulfield.pdf
Caulfield, J. (2011). How to Design and Teach a Hybrid Course: Achieving Student-centered Learning through Blended Classroom, Online and Experiential activities, Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Creswell J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln Y.S. (1994). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. London: The Macmillan Company.
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the Learning in Service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (2002). Beyond surveys: Using the problem solving interview to assess the impact of service-learning on understanding and critical thinking. In A. Furco and S. Billig (eds.), Service-Learning: The Essence of the Pedagogy (pp. 147-159). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Farrall, S. (2006) What is qualitative longitudinal research? Papers in Social Research Methods, Qualitative Series no. 11. London School of Economics and Political Science Methodology Institute: London, U.K. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/methodology/pdf/QualPapers/Stephen-FarrallQual%20Longitudinal%20Res.pdf
Fenwick, T. J. (2000). Expanding conceptions of experiential learning: A review of the five contemporary perspectives on cognition. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(4), 243.
Fenwick, T.J. (2001). Experiential Learning: A Theoretical Critique from Five Perspectives. Columbus, OH: Centre on Education and Training for Employment.
Fenwick, T. J. (2003). Learning through Experience: Troubling Orthodoxies and Intersecting Questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. (2000). An Introduction to Theories of Learning (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hoover, J. D., and Whitehead, C. (1975), An experiential-cognitive methodology in the first course in management: Some preliminary results. In R. H. Buskirk (ed.), Simulation Games and Experiential Learning in Action, Richard H. Buskirk (ed.), pp. 25-30. Austin, TX: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas at Austin.
Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (1999). The Theory and Practice of Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Molloy, D., & Woodfield, K. (2002). Longitudinal Qualitative Research Approaches in Evaluation Studies. Department for Work and Pensions: London, U.K. Retrieved from http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/WP7.pdf
Montrose, L. (2008) International study and experiential learning: The academic context. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. Retrieved from: http://www.frontiersjournal.com/issues/vol8/vol8-08_montrose.htm
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sustainable World Coalition. (2010). Sustainable World Sourcebook: Critical Issues, Viable Solutions, Resources for Action. Berkeley, CA: Sustainable World Coalition.
Turner, R.M. (2002). A pragmatic approach to educating: Combining problem-based learning with service learning. Abstracts. ERIC number ED471964.