Experiential learning: Exploring its long-term impact on socially responsible behavior

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 31, 2013
Keywords:
experiential education, experiential learning, high impact learning, qualitative longitudinal research, social responsibility

Main Article Content

Jay Caulfield
Marquette University
Treesa Woods
Marquette University

Abstract

Today’s students are exposed to world events that require considerable cross cultural understanding and recognition that education is far more than learning facts about specific disciplines and diverse groups while sitting in a classroom. For the past several decades, research in education has repeatedly demonstrated that adults learn effectively through experience. However, does experiential learning, when designed specifically to heighten awareness of a significant social problem, evoke socially responsible behavior specific to that problem in the long run?  Employing a qualitative longitudinal research design involving 25 graduate students as participants, this study explored that question. Findings indicated that 94.7% of participants who reported a high impact learning experience when participating in experiential learning while enrolled in a graduate class also reported engaging in socially responsible behavior because of that learning experience. In some instances, the socially responsible behavior continued for as long as three years after the class had ended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Caulfield, J., & Woods, T. (2013). Experiential learning: Exploring its long-term impact on socially responsible behavior. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 31–48. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/3235
Issue
Volume 13, Number 2
Section
Articles
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
     
  2. Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

  3. In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Author Biographies

Jay Caulfield, Marquette University

Jay Caulfield, Ph.D. As associate dean, Dr. Caulfield has led the curriculum design of the college’s graduate degree in leadership studies. She routinely teaches courses in leadership theory, research methods and qualitative research. She serves on numerous university and college committees and boards including the University Board of Graduate Studies, the Institutional Review Board and currently chairs the University Committee on Teaching. In spring of 2011, she received an outstanding service award from the College of Professional Studies for her teaching, service and research. She is a member of the International Leadership Association and the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Recent published studies include, Why should I tell you how you teach? An expectancy theory perspective; and Applying graduate student perceptions of task engagement to enhance learning conditions. In 2011, she published a book titled, How to Design and Teach a Hybrid Course: Achieving Student-Centered Learning through Blended Classroom, Online and Experiential Activities. She is currently working on a longitudinal study in transformational leadership, a longitudinal study in experiential learning and a second book on leadership.

Treesa Woods, Marquette University

Treesa Woods, M.B.A., M.L.S. As a past graduate student on full diversity and merit scholarship at Marquette University, Ms. Woods' research interest is in experiential learning. She participated in this research study while enrolled as a graduate student at Marquette.

References

Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://greaterexpectations.org/

Association of Experiential Education (2012). Retrieved from http://www.aee.org/about/whatIsEE

Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of Peace: The Hidden Side of History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Boyte, H. C., & Mehaffy, G. (2008). The Civic Agency Initiative. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

Caulfield, J. (2007). What motivates students to provide feedback to teachers about teaching and learning? An expectancy theory perspective. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1 – 19. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v1n1/caulfield/IJ_Caulfield.pdf

Caulfield, J. (2011). How to Design and Teach a Hybrid Course: Achieving Student-centered Learning through Blended Classroom, Online and Experiential activities, Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Creswell J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln Y.S. (1994). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. London: The Macmillan Company.

Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the Learning in Service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (2002). Beyond surveys: Using the problem solving interview to assess the impact of service-learning on understanding and critical thinking. In A. Furco and S. Billig (eds.), Service-Learning: The Essence of the Pedagogy (pp. 147-159). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Farrall, S. (2006) What is qualitative longitudinal research? Papers in Social Research Methods, Qualitative Series no. 11. London School of Economics and Political Science Methodology Institute: London, U.K. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/methodology/pdf/QualPapers/Stephen-FarrallQual%20Longitudinal%20Res.pdf

Fenwick, T. J. (2000). Expanding conceptions of experiential learning: A review of the five contemporary perspectives on cognition. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(4), 243.

Fenwick, T.J. (2001). Experiential Learning: A Theoretical Critique from Five Perspectives. Columbus, OH: Centre on Education and Training for Employment.

Fenwick, T. J. (2003). Learning through Experience: Troubling Orthodoxies and Intersecting Questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. (2000). An Introduction to Theories of Learning (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoover, J. D., and Whitehead, C. (1975), An experiential-cognitive methodology in the first course in management: Some preliminary results. In R. H. Buskirk (ed.), Simulation Games and Experiential Learning in Action, Richard H. Buskirk (ed.), pp. 25-30. Austin, TX: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas at Austin.

Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (1999). The Theory and Practice of Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Molloy, D., & Woodfield, K. (2002). Longitudinal Qualitative Research Approaches in Evaluation Studies. Department for Work and Pensions: London, U.K. Retrieved from http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/WP7.pdf

Montrose, L. (2008) International study and experiential learning: The academic context. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. Retrieved from: http://www.frontiersjournal.com/issues/vol8/vol8-08_montrose.htm

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sustainable World Coalition. (2010). Sustainable World Sourcebook: Critical Issues, Viable Solutions, Resources for Action. Berkeley, CA: Sustainable World Coalition.

Turner, R.M. (2002). A pragmatic approach to educating: Combining problem-based learning with service learning. Abstracts. ERIC number ED471964.