Personal Impacts of the Undergraduate Teaching Assistant Experience
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of undergraduate teaching assistants (UTAs) has increased in recent years at a number of institutions, especially in active-learning and high-enrollment introductory courses. Currently, there is research demonstrating their benefit to the departments they work in, the students, and the short-term impacts of the experience on the UTAs. However, no study to date has investigated the long-term impacts of the UTA experience on the participants themselves, and a number of studies call for such an investigation. This research sought to fill that gap in understanding by utilizing a Grounded Theory approach to investigate the perceptions of participants who had served as an UTA in the biology department at a large research institution in the upper Midwest. This research found strong consensus among participants that the UTA experience offers overwhelmingly positive personal benefits including improved self-confidence, a sense of personal reward, and a sense of community that resulted from working with faculty members, and the ability to balance and self-regulate a variety of time commitments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM‐rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98-120.
Bowling, B., Doyle, M., Taylor, J., & Antes, A. (2015). Professionalizing the role of peer leaders in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(2), 30.
Chapin, H. C., Wiggins, B. L., & Martin-Morris, L. E. (2014). Undergraduate Science Learners Show Comparable Outcomes Whether Taught by Undergraduate or Graduate Teaching Assistants. Journal of college science teaching, 44(2).
Cherestes, A. (2015). Peer led learning in STEM disciplines. Paper presented at the Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2015 International Conference on.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research : meaning and perspective in the research process. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
De Welde, K., & Laursen, S. (2011). The glass obstacle course: Informal and formal barriers for women Ph. D. students in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 571-595.
DeBeck, G., Settelmeyer, S., Li, S., & Demaree, D. (2010). TA Beliefs in a SCALE-UP Style Classroom. Paper presented at the 2010 Physics Education Research Conference.
Drane, D., Micari, M., & Light, G. (2014). Students as teachers: effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(3), 210-230.
Eisner, E. W. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice: Teachers College Press.
Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data: the articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chi cago: Aldine.
Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction: Longman White Plains, NY.
Johnson, E. C., Robbins, B. A., & Loui, M. C. (2015). What Do Students Experience as Peer Leaders of Learning Teams? Advances in Engineering Education, 4(4), n4.
Kendall, K. D., & Schussler, E. E. (2012). Does instructor type matter? Undergraduate student perception of graduate teaching assistants and professors. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 187-199.
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 12, 59-76
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge university press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Retrieved June, 9, 2008.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach: Sage.
Morris, D. B., & Usher, E. L. (2011). Developing teaching self-efficacy in research institutions: A study of award-winning professors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 232-245.
Philipp, S. B., Tretter, T. R., & Rich, C. V. (2016a). Development of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants as Effective Instructors in STEM Courses. Journal of college science teaching, 45(3), 74.
Philipp, S. B., Tretter, T. R., & Rich, C. V. (2016b). Undergraduate teaching assistant impact on student academic achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(2).
Pon-Barry, H., Packard, B. W.-L., & St. John, A. (2017). Expanding capacity and promoting inclusion in introductory computer science: a focus on near-peer mentor preparation and code review. Computer Science Education, 1-24.
Quitadamo, I. J., Brahler, C. J., & Crouch, G. J. (2009). Peer-Led Team Learning: A Prospective Method for Increasing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Science Courses. Science Educator, 18(1), 29-39.
Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2016). A case study of long‐term engagement and identity‐in‐practice: Insights into the STEM pathways of four underrepresented youths. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 768-801.
Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice: Sage.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers: Sage.
Schalk, K. A., McGinnis, J. R., Harring, J. R., Hendrickson, A., & Smith, A. C. (2009). The undergraduate teaching assistant experience offers opportunities similar to the undergraduate research experience. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education: JMBE, 10(1), 32.
Snyder, J. J., & Wiles, J. R. (2015). Peer Led Team Learning in Introductory Biology: Effects on Peer Leader Critical Thinking Skills. PloS one, 10(1), e0115084.
Tennant, M. (1997). Psychology and Adult Learning.
Tennant, M. (2007). Psychology and Adult Learning: Routledge.
Thomson, S. B. (2010). Sample Size and Grounded Theory. Journal of Administration and Governance, 5(1), 45-52.
Weidert, J. M., Wendorf, A. R., Gurung, R. A., & Filz, T. (2012). A survey of graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants. College teaching, 60(3), 95-103.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity: Cambridge university press.
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2015). Teaching assistants' perceptions of a training to support an inquiry-based general chemistry laboratory course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 824-842.
Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small Groups, Significant Impact: A Review of Peer-Led Team Learning Research with Implications for STEM Education Researchers and Faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1686-1702.
Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S. Y., . . . Warner, I. M. (2012). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148-156.