Assessing Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants and Peer Mentors

Main Article Content

Jeffrey W. Murray
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-6398
Bonnie Boaz
Leslie Cohen-Gee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-6843
Joshua Galligan
Christian Horlick

Abstract

This essay offers assessment rubrics for three of the most common modalities of engagement of undergraduate teaching assistants and peer mentors serving in the undergraduate classroom: leading/facilitating a whole-class activity or discussion, facilitating a small-group activity or discussion, and working with students one-on-one.  In developing these assessment tools, we began with a sketch of our program’s learning objectives, and conducted an analysis of former UTAs’ start-of-semester “work plans” and end-of-semester “final reflections,” which allowed us to better match the rubrics with students’ own goals / motivations for serving as UTAs and perceptions of their own experiences as UTAs.  We hope that these three assessment rubrics can be productively adopted or adapted by other faculty mentors working with undergraduate teaching assistants or peer mentors in similar programs, as well as stimulate further discussion about appropriate learning objectives and assessment resources for such programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Murray, J. W., Boaz, B., Cohen-Gee, L., Galligan, J., & Horlick, C. (2022). Assessing Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants and Peer Mentors. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i2.31276
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Jeffrey W. Murray, Virginia Commonwealth Univeristy

Assistant Professor Department of Focused Inquiry

References

Please Note: Six citations have been withheld for the blind review process, as they contain information that identifies either authors’ names or authors’ institutional affiliations.

Carver, R. (1996). Theory for practice: A framework for thinking about experiential education.
Journal of Experiential Education, 19(1), 8-13.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F105382599601900102

Crowe, J., Ceresola, R., & Silva, T. (2014). Enhancing student learning of research methods
through the use of undergraduate teaching assistants. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 39(6), 759-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.871222

Eyler, J. (2009). The power of experiential education. Liberal Education, 95(4), 24-31.
https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/power-experiential-education

Searight, H. R., Retzloff, C., & Narkiewicz, G. (2015). “It’s much more than just teaching:” The
experience of undergraduate peer educators. International Journal of Education and
Social Science 2(6), 8-17. http://www.ijessnet.com

Tough, P. (2014, May 15). Who gets to graduate? The New York Times Magazine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/magazine/who-gets-to-graduate.html

Weiler, L. Haddock, S., Zimmerman, T. S., Krafchick, J., Henry, K., & Rudisill, S. (2013).
Benefits derived by college students from mentoring at-risk youth in a service-learning
course. American Journal of Community Psychology 3-4, 236-248.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9589-z