Impact of working conditions on faculty teaching: Analysis of full-time tenure track and part time non-tenure track faculty

Main Article Content

Kathryn Berlin
DoMonique Brock

Abstract

The following exploration examined the impact of working conditions on faculty teaching for full-time faculty and non-tenure track faculty within an academic department at a large Midwestern university to determine whether employment status and working conditions potentially impacted student learning outcomes. Questions asked of participating faculty focused on factors related to, or influencing, teaching that may improve or hinder student learning. Factors such as available resources, interaction with department administrators and other faculty, job satisfaction, work-life integration, and mentorship were explored through written surveys and one-on-one interviews. Twelve faculty, out of a target population of 33, provided insight as to concerns or issues they felt impeded or supported teaching efforts. Although the exploration contained a small sample size, department administrators implemented changes to address faculty concerns to reduce “disconnects” and issues mentioned by faculty members. Primary changes occurred around part time faculty input on curriculum development and interactions with department administrators and full time faculty. While still ongoing, initial feedback is positive and indicates faculty are adapting to the changes. Further work is necessary to examine individual feelings of worth and value, as well as exploring actual student learning outcomes across courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Berlin, K., & Brock, D. (2021). Impact of working conditions on faculty teaching:: Analysis of full-time tenure track and part time non-tenure track faculty. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i3.29899
Section
Case Studies

References

Champlin, D.P., & Knoedler, J. (2017). Contingent labor and higher education. Review of Political Economy, 29(2), 232-248. doi: 10.1080/09538259.2017.1316054
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? The Journal of Human Resources, 40(3), 647–659. doi: 10.3368/jhr.XL.3.647
Johnson, H., & Mejia, M.C. (2014). Online learning and student outcomes in California’s community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_514HJR.pdf
Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(5), 571-598. Retrieved February, 2019, from www.jstor.org/stable/23470964
Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2012). Missing from the institutional data picture: Non-tenure-track faculty. New Directions for Institutional Research, 155, 47-65. doi.org/10.1002/ir.20021
Yakoboski, P.J. (2016). Adjunct views of adjunct positions. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(3), 54-59. doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1170553
Yakoboski, P. J., and Foster, J. E. (2014). Strategic utilization of adjunct and other contingent faculty. TIAA-CREF Institute Trends and Issues. Retrieved from: https://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/public/institute/research/strategic-utilization-of-adjunct-and-other-contingent-faculty